That is a very financially risky route and it surprises me. If my kid was a top prospect, unless he was offered a spot on the top NCAA team and was good with leaving after his first or second year, I would not encourage the college route. An Economics Prof once shared with me how dumb the decision was financially for top prospects to choose NCAA over the O if they plan to finish their college program. You can get your degree anytime, but you can't get your peak athletic performance years back and the sooner you perform well in the NHL the sooner you get massive earning potential. It's also risky to commit three or four years to a (non-earning) program during your peak athletic years with the chance that you could sustain a career limiting injury. Plus, the O provides money for post-secondary. NCAA is a good route for kids whose families are realistic that they will never play in the NHL and are content that they get to play hockey while earning a quality degree in a quality program.