Lafleurs Guy
Guuuuuuuy!
- Jul 20, 2007
- 74,063
- 56,941
He re-injured the knee. He's screwed.What's his actual injury? Why aren't they saying?
He re-injured the knee. He's screwed.What's his actual injury? Why aren't they saying?
I hate to say it but you're right. We've been incredibly patient with him. We can't depend on him any more.What is that saying? The best ability is availability?
He's basically the polar opposite of Suzuki in that sense. He showed good signs in year 1, but he had to be shut down that year. He was shut down in year 2 as well right at the start. In year 3, he never regained the form he showed in year 1, and he got shut down yet again playing less games than year 1.
Now he's 24, and missed too much time. He will no longer be penciled into a top 6 role. It's very much an uphill battle for him now, especially in Montreal.
ACL? MCL? Meniscus?He re-injured the knee. He's screwed.
The main difference is Guhle is ready to go the minute he's back in. A really good game today given the pace and opposition.Doesn’t Guhle have a significant injury history from his minor league days? If so, scouts need to pay attention — the ability to stay healthy is on par with any other skill — some even say that health is a skill.
Some players are more susceptible to injury, freak or not. If they’re missing time in their minor league career, chances are that trend will continue as an NHLer.![]()
I don't know. I only know it was surgery on the same knee... It was my understanding he'd re-injured it and required similar surgery to last time.ACL? MCL? Meniscus?
There's no doubt they will try to acquire a high end C either via trade or as a UFA but Hughes has also been very clear that they care about fit, and if the right guy can't be acquired they won't force it. So yeah Dach can't be penciled into a top-6 role, but it also shouldn't be a total surprise if he gets another chance as 2C next year simply because odds aren't high that you can find a solution that makes sense.What is that saying? The best ability is availability?
He's basically the polar opposite of Suzuki in that sense. He showed good signs in year 1, but he had to be shut down that year. He was shut down in year 2 as well right at the start. In year 3, he never regained the form he showed in year 1, and he got shut down yet again playing less games than year 1.
Now he's 24, and missed too much time. He will no longer be penciled into a top 6 role. It's very much an uphill battle for him now, especially in Montreal.
Things get simple if hab players need to earn their spot moving forward, they’ll fall in their chairs.There's no doubt they will try to acquire a high end C either via trade or as a UFA but Hughes has also been very clear that they care about fit, and if the right guy can't be acquired they won't force it. So yeah Dach can't be penciled into a top-6 role, but it also shouldn't be a total surprise if he gets another chance as 2C next year simply because odds aren't high that you can find a solution that makes sense.
And it's worth noting that Dach did have 13 points in the final 23 games, which is a 46 point pace and basically low end 2C production. Not what we hoped for but shows he was getting back on track even if it was taking way more time then we would have wanted.
Bottom line is we can't count on Dach, but we also shouldn't write him off either.
So who earned the spot this year?Things get simple if hab players need to earn their spot moving forward, they’ll fall in their chairs.
Noone. There’s no 2nd line. But they started giving icetime to the guys playing well and cutting it in the 3rd to win through the lineup, which is a new plateau for the team collectively. Not playing to “future potential” but to win. Literally make or break for me to watch anymore btw so I enjoy it.So who earned the spot this year?
Newhook struggled just as much, Evans was given several opportunities in the #2 spot and did nothing there, only Dvorak wasn't given a chance and hard to claim he earned anything, especially early in the season when he was as bad as anyone.
It's never simple when there's nobody playing well enough to earn the spot.
Probably not a full ACL or else he’d be gone for 9-12 months.Yes.
Dach was the most useless forward on the team by a significant margin. His hotstreak he managed 13 in 23 and everyone was claiming he was back.So who earned the spot this year?
Newhook struggled just as much, Evans was given several opportunities in the #2 spot and did nothing there, only Dvorak wasn't given a chance and hard to claim he earned anything, especially early in the season when he was as bad as anyone.
It's never simple when there's nobody playing well enough to earn the spot.
Dach first lost the 2C spot after 6 games. This idea that we just let Dach suck and tried to tough it through because of where he was drafted or what we traded for him is pure fantasy. We did exactly what you wanted, he wasn't cutting it as 2C and we made changes 11 days into the season.Noone. There’s no 2nd line. But they started giving icetime to the guys playing well and cutting it in the 3rd to win through the lineup, which is a new plateau for the team collectively. Not playing to “future potential” but to win. Literally make or break for me to watch anymore btw so I enjoy it.
For Dach that would mean “beat out Newhook, Beck, unacquired big time 2c, etc. and you have that role” vs “we’re investing a lot of hope in him so he gets 2c and we tough it out we suck anyway”. How unfair his injuries are or his draft rank, or trade price, salary, are irrelevant to his output.
Interesting, it felt like months and I figured much longer, maybe I am conflating his unfortunate pp time as well. Either way we all hope he recovers and has some impact coming back; I would not be comfortable going into the season with their 4 best centerman right now, have no hopes he’s a 2c and I would love more big winger depth, nothing wrong if that’s how he turns out for me, loving Anderson and Gally right now for example.Dach first lost the 2C spot after 6 games. This idea that we just let Dach suck and tried to tough it through because of where he was drafted or what we traded for him is pure fantasy. We did exactly what you wanted, he wasn't cutting it as 2C and we made changes 11 days into the season.
There's no doubt they will try to acquire a high end C either via trade or as a UFA but Hughes has also been very clear that they care about fit, and if the right guy can't be acquired they won't force it. So yeah Dach can't be penciled into a top-6 role, but it also shouldn't be a total surprise if he gets another chance as 2C next year simply because odds aren't high that you can find a solution that makes sense.
And it's worth noting that Dach did have 13 points in the final 23 games, which is a 46 point pace and basically low end 2C production. Not what we hoped for but shows he was getting back on track even if it was taking way more time then we would have wanted.
Bottom line is we can't count on Dach, but we also shouldn't write him off either.
Oh, but we can...Bottom line is we can't count on Dach, but we also shouldn't write him off either.
Demidov getting a bonafide 2C to play with should definitely be more important than Dach's future because Dach already got his fair share of chances and Demidov, if developed properly, stands a chance of becoming a franchise player in Montreal!Noone. There’s no 2nd line. But they started giving icetime to the guys playing well and cutting it in the 3rd to win through the lineup, which is a new plateau for the team collectively. Not playing to “future potential” but to win. Literally make or break for me to watch anymore btw so I enjoy it.
For Dach that would mean “beat out Newhook, Beck, unacquired big time 2c, etc. and you have that role” vs “we’re investing a lot of hope in him so he gets 2c and we tough it out we suck anyway”. How unfair his injuries are or his draft rank, or trade price, salary, are irrelevant to the worth of his output. Also Demidov needing a good C should be higher on priorities than Dach’s future. Agree the candidate is probably not in the org unless Hage makes an immediate impact eventually but next year is super important.
Odds are low we get a high end 2C because every team is looking for those. But sure if we do trade for Crosby or Horvat or Petterson or whichever pipe dream you have in mind then sure we can move on from Dach. But you can't write Dach off before you actually do acquire that real center.Oh, but we can...
The arrival of Half-a-Dove and the acquisition of a full 2C by Hughes would banish Dach to the bottom-6.
Dach's F/O skills (lack of, rather), his inexistant defensive acumen and his lack of hustle make him ill-equipped forabottom-6 role, whether it is at C or on the wing.
If he can't be traded for a 2nd round pick, he should be placed on waivers, plain and simple.
Can't count on Dach. He's a piece of glass. Why the Black Hawks got rid of himInteresting, it felt like months and I figured much longer, maybe I am conflating his unfortunate pp time as well. Either way we all hope he recovers and has some impact coming back; I would not be comfortable going into the season with their 4 best centerman right now, have no hopes he’s a 2c and I would love more big winger depth, nothing wrong if that’s how he turns out for me, loving Anderson and Gally right now for example.
Less pressure on him as well to be a maybe-depth-winger; it stifled Drouin for sure; some peeps aren’t made for the spotlight as much. Suzuki is the other end of the spectrum, he really is a money player.Can't count on Dach. He's a piece of glass. Why the Black Hawks got rid of him
I'd say they got rid of him because they realized his hockey IQ was going to be an issue on any top 6 as well.Can't count on Dach. He's a piece of glass. Why the Black Hawks got rid of him
He probably has no trade value, so “writing him off” does not really mean much? You take what he gives moving forward; a full recovery would already be great for him I figure.Odds are low we get a high end 2C because every team is looking for those. But sure if we do trade for Crosby or Horvat or Petterson or whichever pipe dream you have in mind then sure we can move on from Dach. But you can't write Dach off before you actually do acquire that real center.
Maybe for a hopeless team, but for a serious team that's unacceptable.And it's worth noting that Dach did have 13 points in the final 23 games, which is a 46 point pace and basically low end 2C production.