Player Discussion Kirby Dach (Part 3): TabarDach Edition!

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
  • We're expecting server maintenance on March 3rd starting at midnight, there may be downtime during the work.
I'm guessing that Chicago would rather have Romanov now than Nazar.
Nazar has 4pts in his last 5gp and he's putting it together. On an awful team if he can squeeze a 40pt season as a rookie (currently pacing for 37), who would turn that down?

On Dach:

Prior to going down with another injury, we were told often enough that Dach has been enjoying a resurgence. Hockey-reference lumps games in 20gp chunks, Dach's last 20gp chunk was game 41-57 (when he went down). He had 8 pts in 17gp (a 38pt pace) and 1.17 shots on goal in 15min ice time per game. Imagine, this is supposed to be Dach's best span of the season and it's a paltry 38pt pace. This has been a disaster of a season for him.

And getting another injury is just rotten luck. Hopefully he can rehab and recover over summer and surprise everyone.

Screenshot 2025-03-03 at 07.51.59.png
 
It wasn't included - it was a three way deal.

Chicago got the 13th pick (Islanders) and a 4th rounder Habs
Habs got Dach
Islanders got Romanov and Habs 3rd

As for Nazar, we don't need another 5'10" forward.
A 6 foot 4 guy who can’t play is much closer to whatever need, right??

I didn’t mind the approach at the time. Dach wouldn’t have been the horse I bet on, but I I liked the approach. Sake as newhook
 
Kirby Dach's are a dime a dozen in jr hockey, stop pretending he was a rare gem

This was you less than a year ago:
Screenshot_20250303-070911.png


So even you agree.

Too many people are disingenuous here and would rather spew useless drivel than have a genuine discussion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DAChampion
This was you less than a year ago:View attachment 985732

So even you agree.

Too many people are disingenuous here and would rather spew useless drivel than have a genuine discussion.
Hage is important to us due to our barren C prospect depth but playmaking C prospects but Playmaking Cs are the least rare in prospect pools. It’s just many many of them never step up.

I guess it’s undeniable Dach’s busting is painful, as would be Hage’s.
 
Hage is important to us due to our barren C prospect depth but playmaking C prospects but Playmaking Cs are the least rare in prospect pools. It’s just many many of them never step up.

I guess it’s undeniable Dach’s busting is painful, as would be Hage’s.

Hage is at least tracking well with a splendid D+1.
 
Kapanen isn't chopped liver either.

Yes.

Lots of seemingly good players get drafted. On average, the Habs draft seven promising players every year, I'm guessing an average of two centers.

But the very best predictor historically seems to be how they do in their D+1, D+2, D+3, etc. If they progress and don't get injured every five minutes, then things look rosy.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad