Toggle sidebar

Kings Prospect #8

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
  • We are currently aware of "log in/security error" issues that are affecting some users. We apologize and ask for your patience as we try to get these issues fixed.
Holden Caulfield

Holden Caulfield

CANADA. True North Strong and FREE
Feb 15, 2006
23,383
6,259
Winnipeg
1. RW Tyler Toffoli 96.3% (LW Valentin Zykov 3.7%, NA)
Vote in: Kitsyn 11, Prokhorkin 3, Bartosak 1, Andreoff 1

2. LW Tanner Pearson 40.8% (LW Valentin Zykov 34.2%, C Linden Vey 15.8%)
Vote in: Prokhorkin 8, Bartosak 2, Miller 2, Andreoff 2, Berube 1, Roach 1, Hyka 1

3. C Linden Vey 44.3% (LW Valentin Zykov 41.8%, D Derek Forbort 5.1%)
Vote in: Andreoff 12, Bartosak 2, Deslauriers 2, Miller 1

4. LW Valentin Zykov 75.3% (D Derek Forbort 8.2%, D Kevin Gravel 5.5%)
Vote in: Ebert 3, Bartosak 2, Deslauriers 2, Miller 1

5. D Derek Forbort 35.8% (D Kevin Gravel 20.9%, LW Maxim Kitsyn 13.4%)
Vote in: Bartosak 3, Miller 2, Deslauriers 2, Brodzinski 1, Kubalik 1, Berube 1

6. D Kevin Gravel 34.9% (LW Maxim Kitysn 25.8%, RW Brandon Kozun 12.1%)
Vote in: Deslauriers 5, Miller 2, Fasching 1, Weal 1

7. LW Maxim Kitsyn 29.2% (C Andy Andreoff 26.4%, LW Nikolai Prokhorkin/C Nick Shore 11.1%)
Vote in: Weal 5, Miller 4, Fasching 2, Roach 1

I'm going C Nick Shore and add RW Hudson Fasching again.

Write in who should be added next.
 
2rKea.jpg
 
I think Roach is being overlooked here. He has size and more than doubled his offensive numbers in a physical, slightly more defensive league.
 
Voted Prokhorkin.

King'sPawn said:
I think Roach is being overlooked here. He has size and more than doubled his offensive numbers in a physical, slightly more defensive league.
Click to expand...

I don't even have him in my top 15. He took a huge step but he needs another big year to show it wasn't a fluke or a man stepping up against the younger competition. I like Roach but not sold yet. Still has to answer a lot of questions in my eyes.
 
palffytofrovlov said:
voted for Shore, I think he has more potential then Porks or AA.

Add Miller....
Click to expand...

To me, I see Shore as a REALLY good 3rd liner. Prokhorkin has a lot of potential as a 2nd liner. And AA will be a 4th liner. I really love Shore's game. He'll probably be my next vote after Prokhorkin.
 
Went with Andy again.

Add Miller, who I also think is being overlooked.
 
cnshockey said:
Voted Prokhorkin.



I don't even have him in my top 15. He took a huge step but he needs another big year to show it wasn't a fluke or a man stepping up against the younger competition. I like Roach but not sold yet. Still has to answer a lot of questions in my eyes.
Click to expand...

That's fair.

I guess I'm more baffled that Miller is getting voted in more than him. Both have doubled their numbers as 20 year-olds against younger competition, but Roach is bigger and did it in a less offensive league.
 
Holden Caulfield said:
Holloway is not a prospect according to hf standards, which is what we are going by.
Click to expand...

[mod]

Yep. He posted on a thread on the main board how Moller is superior and disparaged Holloway if I remember correctly. Can't take anything he says seriously.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
cnshockey said:
Yep. He posted on a thread on the main board how Moller is superior and disparaged Holloway if I remember correctly. Can't take anything he says seriously.
Click to expand...
Please show me that thread because I don't believe moller is superior. Holloway, IMO, is a great "prospect" (if you can call him that) and believe that he should be added as the 9th best prospect.

[mod]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hitman47 said:
Please show me that thread because I don't believe moller is superior. Holloway, IMO, is a great "prospect" (if you can call him that) and believe that he should be added as the 9th best prospect.

[mod]
Click to expand...

As I said above, Holloway does not meet prospect standards. So he will not be considered. Please vote for somebody else to be added.
 
King'sPawn said:
That's fair.

I guess I'm more baffled that Miller is getting voted in more than him. Both have doubled their numbers as 20 year-olds against younger competition, but Roach is bigger and did it in a less offensive league.
Click to expand...

I think Miller has more upside as an NHLer. Roach's offensive production was nice to see, but also highly unsuspected and not likely to continue at a higher level, IMO. Roach's looks to take on a Matt Greene like role, using his size to defend his crease and be physical on the boards (maybe not as nasty as Greene, but that overall style). I don't see Roach capable of producing offensively at the NHL level in great quantities.

I'm not saying Miller will, but I see it as more likely to occur. Additionally, Miller was named as the winner of the Mickey Renaud Captain's Trophy, which shows his leadership capabilities. Miller to me will make the NHL and has the upper ceiling in his potential to be a very good two-way defenseman if he can bulk up.

Roach I think can make the NHL as well, I just don't see the same likelihood he makes it (though I do think he will, just not as likely as Miller) nor does he have the same upper ceiling in terms of talent.

Roach is just to raw, Miller's more polished IMO. And I do like both of them. That said, once Miller gets voted in, the next on my list to get added is LaDue.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom