HeadInjury
Registered User
- Jul 30, 2005
- 1,705
- 645
The irony of this one-sided deal is that it helps Chicago re-sign Kubalik.
It really doesn't make any difference if Maatta is playing with Dewey or on the bottom pair, the point is for them to not have to play 3 rookies (or 2 rookies & MacDermid) on the left side every night.
Mission accomplished.
I thought he was always the guy getting hurt in Pitt?
My expectation is that Blake finds someone to play with DD. Maata is a bottom pairing guy that skates poorly. Why waste cap space with all these teams out there in cap trouble. Kings do not need to "buy time". Why help a team we should be competing with for a wild card spot.
Was fully expecting LA to give up one of the 3 second round picks to acquire a top 4 serviceable defenseman.
Huh? Where did I say that? Last time I checked the 3rd pairing is the bottom pair.And what do you think the cost would be for a guy that is good enough to really be a legitimate pairing with DD and who would be willing to just dump a guy like that?
You aren't getting a guy like that for just some 2nd or 3rd round pick. It's easy to have an expectation but call your shot here. Who would you get and what would you pay for it? I think it makes for good discussion rather than just saying Maata is a bottom pairing which he isn't. He is probably a 3rd pairing guy.
I hate it. Pretty clear signal to the team that we're fine with another loser year -- can't wait to see DD excitedly waddling into camp.
My expectation is that Blake finds someone to play with DD. Maata is a bottom pairing guy that skates poorly. Why waste cap space with all these teams out there in cap trouble. Kings do not need to "buy time". Why help a team we should be competing with for a wild card spot.
The irony of this one-sided deal is that it helps Chicago re-sign Kubalik.
Huh? Where did I say that? Last time I checked the 3rd pairing is the bottom pair.
I like it... I also don't think the left side of the D is set. No info just my opinion.