KHL Season 2024-25
- Thread starter eal
- Start date
Caser
Moderator
SoundAndFury
Registered User
- May 28, 2012
- 11,900
- 5,938
Seems like he simply doesn't want to play and doesn't retire simply because "never say never".
aonb
Registered User
- Oct 26, 2013
- 1,766
- 791
31 years old, a bit odd decision but i'm not a professional hockey player at the end of a day
vorky
@vorkywh24
- Jan 23, 2010
- 11,515
- 1,324
That is a final nail in IIHF coffin. Tardif, Bŕíza, Nurminen, Hietanen & Larsson should do hockey instead.
EbonyRaptor
Registered User
I see Denis Zernov is finally back in the lineup for Magnitogorsk. They got Danila Yurrov back a few weeks ago but still don't have Roman Kantserov back from injury. Has anyone seen a report on Kantserov's recovery and possible date for return?
Official KHL statement on HC Sochi player Michal Kristof
Sochi player Michal Kristof, who is under a valid contract with a KHL club, took to the ice for a team in Switzerland on Friday, Oct. 18. In its work, the KHL has always adhered to a policy of respecting valid contracts in other leagues and call ...
en.khl.ru
Caser
Moderator
vorky
@vorkywh24
- Jan 23, 2010
- 11,515
- 1,324
It is dangerous for global hockey what the IIHF has done. De lege lata the IIHF regulations obligate all European clubs to honor the players´ contract with NHL clubs. The NHL is so-called “non-member organization” for IIHF purposes, Of course, the NHL wants their contracts to be respected by all European clubs, so the IIHF included that rule into regulations. But it does not work the other way, “non-member organization” is NOT obligated to honor the players´ contract with Euro club.Official KHL statement on HC Sochi player Michal Kristof
Sochi player Michal Kristof, who is under a valid contract with a KHL club, took to the ice for a team in Switzerland on Friday, Oct. 18. In its work, the KHL has always adhered to a policy of respecting valid contracts in other leagues and call ...
The KHL has the same legal status of “non-member organization” for IIHF like the NHL since the current season. The IIHF decision on Krištof has all atributes of illegal decision. The biggest loser is the player who will be sued by Sochi, he will compensate the club.
It is always dangerous when the global organisations (IIHF) ignore the law & their rules. It may lead to the irrelevance of that organisation for their inability to protect its basic principles. For hockey it may lead to a situation when the law & rules are ignored while the clubs & leagues with more money will win with smaller clubs & leagues becoming weaker & poorer. I do not know if you RIgafan want it, but IIHF wants it.
EbonyRaptor
Registered User
WarriorofTime
Registered User
- Jul 3, 2010
- 31,564
- 20,661
7-0 victory.
Highlights:
Last edited:
Caser
Moderator
Caser
Moderator
jcbio11
Registered User
1. Not even remotely true. NHL has bilateral agreements with IIHF, there are rules. KHL has got nothing. And it's their own fault. They were the ones who quit IIHF.
2. No, he won't and you know that. The biggest loser in all this is russian hockey, both the KHL and the national team (frankly, Russia has no national team to speak of atm).
What they did to Ivan Fedotov was disgusting and this was back when they were still abiding by the transfer rules. Now they have quit the IIHF and cry about a player leaving. The hypocricy is astounding.
KHL played stupid games and won stupid prizes.
No, there aren't. KHL threw a temper tantrum and quit the IIHF. This is what they wanted.
