KHL Season 2024-25

aonb

Registered User
Oct 26, 2013
1,758
780
what happened to Artyom Fyodorov? 22/23 was his last season. Decent player with Spartak. I can't see any info about him being retired on eliteprocpects
 

SoundAndFury

Registered User
May 28, 2012
11,872
5,895
what happened to Artyom Fyodorov? 22/23 was his last season. Decent player with Spartak. I can't see any info about him being retired on eliteprocpects
Seems like he simply doesn't want to play and doesn't retire simply because "never say never".
 

EbonyRaptor

Registered User
Jul 10, 2009
7,377
3,300
Geezerville
I see Denis Zernov is finally back in the lineup for Magnitogorsk. They got Danila Yurrov back a few weeks ago but still don't have Roman Kantserov back from injury. Has anyone seen a report on Kantserov's recovery and possible date for return?
 

Caser

Moderator
May 21, 2013
14,280
13,524
twitter.com
I see Denis Zernov is finally back in the lineup for Magnitogorsk. They got Danila Yurrov back a few weeks ago but still don't have Roman Kantserov back from injury. Has anyone seen a report on Kantserov's recovery and possible date for return?
It was reported that possibly he might be back already in their next game.
 

vorky

@vorkywh24
Jan 23, 2010
11,503
1,323
It is dangerous for global hockey what the IIHF has done. De lege lata the IIHF regulations obligate all European clubs to honor the players´ contract with NHL clubs. The NHL is so-called “non-member organization” for IIHF purposes, Of course, the NHL wants their contracts to be respected by all European clubs, so the IIHF included that rule into regulations. But it does not work the other way, “non-member organization” is NOT obligated to honor the players´ contract with Euro club.

The KHL has the same legal status of “non-member organization” for IIHF like the NHL since the current season. The IIHF decision on Krištof has all atributes of illegal decision. The biggest loser is the player who will be sued by Sochi, he will compensate the club.

It is always dangerous when the global organisations (IIHF) ignore the law & their rules. It may lead to the irrelevance of that organisation for their inability to protect its basic principles. For hockey it may lead to a situation when the law & rules are ignored while the clubs & leagues with more money will win with smaller clubs & leagues becoming weaker & poorer. I do not know if you RIgafan want it, but IIHF wants it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rigafan

Rigafan

Registered User
Jul 28, 2016
913
198
Europe
It is dangerous for global hockey what the IIHF has done. De lege lata the IIHF regulations obligate all European clubs to honor the players´ contract with NHL clubs. The NHL is so-called “non-member organization” for IIHF purposes, Of course, the NHL wants their contracts to be respected by all European clubs, so the IIHF included that rule into regulations. But it does not work the other way, “non-member organization” is NOT obligated to honor the players´ contract with Euro club.

The KHL has the same legal status of “non-member organization” for IIHF like the NHL since the current season. The IIHF decision on Krištof has all atributes of illegal decision. The biggest loser is the player who will be sued by Sochi, he will compensate the club.

It is always dangerous when the global organisations (IIHF) ignore the law & their rules. It may lead to the irrelevance of that organisation for their inability to protect its basic principles. For hockey it may lead to a situation when the law & rules are ignored while the clubs & leagues with more money will win with smaller clubs & leagues becoming weaker & poorer. I do not know if you RIgafan want it, but IIHF wants it.

I agree with you the rules are there and should be respected
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad