It's all been said, and I'm preaching to the choir, but.
I really took issue with Kevyn's interview on Schopp and the Bulldog yesterday. He went into how disappointed they were in the results of this season and how the 13 game streak was his fault very mechanically, just ticking off the things he's "supposed" to say. He became more animated for his deep dive into that streak. He tells us how their expected goals were even or positive in 6 of those 13 games, so maybe they were unlucky and should have won those, and that they really didn't play too terribly during the streak.
First, that is not true at all - they were dreadful for many of those 13 games. The game on long island, maybe 3rd loss in a row? Was absolutely disgusting. It was the worst hockey game I've seen a non-last-place Sabres team play. The Colorado game speaks for itself - it was so bad, the media bullied him into making an appearance to explain himself, and he spent the whole time derisive and combative to any suggestion that it wasn't beneath him to be there in that moment. "the playoffs are not made or missed in December." Oh yeah, Kevyn? Then why is that streak the first thing you bring up every time you open your mouth to analyze the season?
His team promptly lost their next 7, including the infamous game in Montreal where they follow up a rousing visit from the owner (no changes are coming, the answer is in the room) with a 6-1 drubbing. Kevyn, there are some pretty strong signals being sent out there that maybe you should get off your ass and do something.
Second, this expected goals cop-out is extremely cheap. It seems like it exists only to float the idea that the Sabres front office is "advanced" and uses "metrics." I love the expected goal stat - I once tried to develop it myself before discovering it already existed. It is a great tool that, once you collect sufficient data, will tell you more about the next 40 games a team will play than any other stat you have accumulated at that moment. But single game expected goal stats are completely meaningless in isolation, they say nothing more about the results of the next game you'll play than a coinflip. And 6 isn't even half! He is glaringly misusing a stat outside of its proper regime as a cop-out for the team's performance.
And Kevyn, why do you get to flip the results of the games where you out-chance the opponent according to xGF%? Shouldn't you also flip the games where you were out-chanced, but still won? There were 20 of those. Why do you get to flip those games and only those games and judge your season that way, against other teams, who aren't allowed to flip any of their games? You were out-xGF%-ed ~46 times this year and won 20 of those games. Your cumulative xGF% is 27th. Your team finished 26th. That's it. You are where you deserve to be.
But you know what? Fine. Take out those six losses. Better yet, take out all 13! And don't let any other teams take out any of their losses, or games where they were robbed by the deserve-to-win-o-meter. Congrats, you played the rest of them at a 90 point pace! You have STILL missed the playoffs in both conference anyway with that outrageous and fantastical crutch you are employing to make yourself look better.
Thank god they stopped winning when Reimer and the shooters went cold, it would have been beyond insufferable to hear him tout the play of his team against backup goalies and teams that were getting ready for the playoffs, or running for the bus (Boston), long after the pressure of the games mattering for the Sabres had subsided. They still played terribly that whole time.
Kevyn Adams talks about this streak like a guy who aimed at the second wild card spot should everything outside of his control go perfectly. Like his desired outcome wasn't to be great, just to be okay, better than 6 eastern teams but not much more than that. He has a pattern of doing this. Two years ago, Kevyn's team got to 91 points. They did this with 12 skaters hitting a career high in goals, points, or shooting percentage (~8 of those skaters still have career marks in those stats that season). So, a huge statistical outlier got him within a win of the playoffs. Then, his permanent marker 2nd line RW got hurt weeks before the roster shuffling phase of the offseason even began. He did not care about this, and did not address that injury, let alone the potential that guys might not shoot 20% the next season, that career bests are not guaranteed. Predictably, they could not score. But he made a point to tell us more than once how awesome his summer at the lake was, after he added a 6D and 7D and called it a job well done. We all saw this happening in real time, but he didn't. That season was his magnum opus, and we have declined for 730 days since. In each season that followed, Kevyn spoke in couched terms that plainly displayed that his goal was to "compete", not to be great but to hover around 8th/9th/10th in the conference. When you aim this low, and catch an injury or a bad bounce, you are going to miss.
Why can't he start with a 91 point team and shoot for something better? Every team that is not in year 1 or 2 of a rebuild should be functionally capable of becoming a 50 win, ~105 point team. I have seen so many random, boring, unremarkably competent Wild/Blues/Kings/Rangers/Islanders teams over the years put up ~104 points just by being NORMAL and having NORMAL GOALS and working towards them. And when you shoot for a season like this, and fall 5 wins short? You still give yourself a shot. The Sabres should have been gunning for a 2022-23 NJD-like season each of the last two years, they should have been salivating at the thought of having a season like this. Think of how fun that would be, how much more fun than even the 2022-23 season could have been. They should have wanted this so bad it was physically painful. When Alex Tuch or Tage Thompson or Rasmus Dahlin talk to the media, I hear this desire. And frustration that they know deep down that they don't have it. I have never heard anything like this from Kevyn Adams.
What I wouldn't give to hear the media go at him for his flimsy goals. Why are you like this, Kevyn? Why do you tiptoe so cautiously around saying that you need to have your team be very good, even great? Is it because you know that you'll never get this job again, and you need to sell the slooooooooow build as long as you can? Or is it because Terry wants to minimize spending as much as possible? What other explanation can there be for your lack of urgency, for setting a record for available cap space over multiple years? Turns out your plan of filling that up with Quinn/Sammy/Levi contracts got blown up. That was NOT the reason you didn't care to spend. Tell us what it is, you prick. Tell us why you led us along to yank the rug time and time again.
GFY, get your hands away from my hockey team for the love of God. I don't want to hear it. We are DONE. You sicken us, Terry sickens us. You are killing a franchise and we are watching it in real time.
"I should have done more during the losing streak probably"
As Ace has pointed out, YOU own the THREE longest non-tank losing streaks in franchise history. You didn't learn shit. You will do the same thing again next year when your garbage roster flounders and flails. You should not get a 4th chance at fixing a losing streak, or a sixth chance at having a real season. You got hired, you watched Montreal play in a cup final, blow up, finish last, draft a player who isn't impactful yet, draft top 5 two more times, and then steal your spot in the playoffs, which you missed by a mile.
One way or another, after locker room cleanout, I know I will never see or hear this man again.