Speculation: Kevin Labanc

logik47

Registered User
Sep 14, 2014
434
117
Where will he end up?

I'm surprised he's still unsigned. Did he fall off a cliff that much? I remember he took a very friendly-esque deal a couple years ago...
 

Cas

Conversational Black Hole
Sponsor
Jun 23, 2020
5,931
8,569
Where will he end up?

I'm surprised he's still unsigned. Did he fall off a cliff that much? I remember he took a very friendly-esque deal a couple years ago...
He's an offense-only winger who doesn't provide much offense. Lots of lazy minor penalties. He's lost the trust of two consecutive coaches and keeps getting benched.

Also, he took a very team-friendly 1 year, $1 million deal five years ago. He then took a very team-unfriendly 4 year, $19 million contract that proved awful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Helistin and DG93

themelkman

Always Delivers
Apr 26, 2015
11,728
8,802
Calgary, Alberta
Hes not a bad player, he will thrive if you stick him on a good playmakers wing in a sheltered role.

Doug Wilson doing that stupid deal that caused him to get a bloated contract and stop trying was a big problem, but I suspect he will be back to being hungry now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan

Bizz

Slacked for Mack
Oct 17, 2007
11,769
8,081
San Jose
Where will he end up?

I'm surprised he's still unsigned. Did he fall off a cliff that much? I remember he took a very friendly-esque deal a couple years ago...

He was never up on top of a cliff to begin with. He was a product of Thornton's last productive year. That's all. Career AHL'er otherwise, which is where he'll probably end up this year.
 

BKarchitect

Registered User
Oct 12, 2017
8,197
14,662
Kansas City, MO
Same as Sprong/Kubalik.

You can get better for offensive roles.

Doesn't do much for other roles.

Agreed but I mean I’m no Sprong fan but at least he is actually productive on the scoresheet in his limited role. Labanc doesn’t even really have that going for him at the moment.
 

Spearmint Rhino

Registered User
Sep 17, 2013
9,322
9,338
Hes not a bad player, he will thrive if you stick him on a good playmakers wing in a sheltered role.

Doug Wilson doing that stupid deal that caused him to get a bloated contract and stop trying was a big problem, but I suspect he will be back to being hungry now.
It was a cap circumvention deal that backfired
 

Spearmint Rhino

Registered User
Sep 17, 2013
9,322
9,338
I dont disagree, but its hardly the worst case in the league. Nearly every team does it now and the league allows it.
Oh I’m sure there’s others but they just don’t look as bad, hard not to think his performance was negatively affected by it or maybe just a coincidence
 
  • Like
Reactions: themelkman

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
71,514
15,198
Folsom
Labanc will end up in Europe if he chooses to keep playing most likely. He's a one trick pony that got figured out and he doesn't have the will to get better.
 

StewieP19

Registered User
Dec 13, 2022
370
161
Defensively he's horrible and don't put enough point on board to match his horrible def play
 

Honour Over Glory

Blomqvist for Vezina + ROTY
Jan 30, 2012
81,239
45,702
Pretty sure Sullivan and Quinn are basically going to call him in as a PTO then sign him so they never have to play any youth.
 

wintersej

Registered User
Nov 26, 2011
23,169
18,930
North Andover, MA
Is he a one trick pony whose one trick would play up better on a good team, or is he just bad. I find it so hard to judge role players on shitty teams not being put in a position to succeed in their role.
 

jMoneyBrah

Registered User
Jan 10, 2013
1,239
1,871
South Bay
Is he a one trick pony whose one trick would play up better on a good team, or is he just bad. I find it so hard to judge role players on shitty teams not being put in a position to succeed in their role.

As a Sharks fan that has followed his entire NHL career, liked him a lot as a young player, and rooted for him as fan and coach sentiment turned against him in recent years; here is my honest appraisal:

He has a very good but not great shot that he requires time/space to fully utilize. He can be decently creative in the offensive zone if he isn’t being pressured. He doesn’t have the skating, hands, deception, or physicality to go around or through defenses. While he’s not a good option to transport the puck up ice and he struggles to generate offensive opportunities on his own, he can finish plays with his shot or pass when receiving the puck in high-danger areas.

His best season, by a wide margin, he mostly skated with a resurgent Thornton (51 points in 73 games) on the third-line and was the feature of a 2nd PP unit in a system that consistently fed him pucks with time/space as he coasted toward the net from the top of the circle; allowing him to score 20 of his 59 points that season on the man-advantage.

In the past he’s spent considerable time in the coach’s dog-house probably on account of poor decisions with the puck under pressure and an extended track record of ineffective play in the defensive zone.

A team could find utility in Labanc if they can air-drop him onto a third line as a complimentary F3 and put him on a 2nd power-play unit that affords him significant touches. At evens he’ll need to be flanked with two defensively capable linemates who do the bulk of puck transporting and forechecking. Unfortunately for Labanc that’s a pretty narrow window of effectiveness that most teams probably can’t offer; and if they can, they are probably better served developing a young prospect in that low stakes role.

All that being said, I hope he gets a shot with maybe a playoff bubble team, as IMO he showed some willingness to do more defensively and on the forecheck in the few opportunities he was given to play over the last season and change; but was a bit sidelined by the coaching staff and just the overall Sharks situation. With a fresh start, if he can maintain passable off-puck play at both ends, he could probably contribute something as a bottom 6 scoring threat.
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Reactions: wintersej

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
71,514
15,198
Folsom
Is he a one trick pony whose one trick would play up better on a good team, or is he just bad. I find it so hard to judge role players on shitty teams not being put in a position to succeed in their role.
No he’s too lazy to be useful to any NHL team.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad