BenchBrawl
Registered User
- Jul 26, 2010
- 31,062
- 13,989
Having both Slafkovsky and Anderson at wing is a big asset. Few teams can throw two wingers like that at you. Although I think they'll trade Anderson.
If Slaf does not reach his potential because of my post then he certainly does not have the character to deserve the 1OA.You’re comparing Slaf to Lucic which is ludicrous. They obviously don’t have that comparison and the team did the work. Not only did they do the work, McKenzie had Slaf at 1 based on his survey also. Wright didn’t even go at 2, he went at 4!
I’m not saying it’s going to work out but you have to give draft picks time especially with new management. They did the interviews and the analysis. Your response makes it less likely Slaf reaches his ceiling because it builds negative pressure and we know how young kids respond to that. Give them a chance.
Excuse me mister negativity to hope for the best...Any roster that is put out by any GM in Montreal will be considered PO worthy by you. You're just a yesman.
If Wright is as good as most think he is why did it take 3 teams pass on him?Why did another team not trade up seeing he was still on the board?Regardless of the outcome the point is that the risk/reward of passing on Wright makes no sense at all. We essentially drafted a Lucic over a solid chance at Bergeron. It's not that I know the future, but I know the bet Hugo made is poorly thought out. This decision is like forfeiting a 65% chance at winning $10,000,000 for $ a 85% chance at winning $100,000. Stupid bet by Hugo.
Regardless of the outcome the point is that the risk/reward of passing on Wright makes no sense at all. We essentially drafted a Lucic over a solid chance at Bergeron. It's not that I know the future, but I know the bet Hugo made is poorly thought out. This decision is like forfeiting a 65% chance at winning $10,000,000 for $ a 85% chance at winning $100,000. Stupid bet by Hugo.
If Wright is as good as most think he is why did it take 3 teams passing on him?Why did another team not trade up seeing he was still on the board?
I think they will too. Hughes has been talking too much about him for it not to happen, I think.Having both Slafkovsky and Anderson at wing is a big asset. Few teams can throw two wingers like that at you. Although I think they'll trade Anderson.
And yet you're pretending by claiming one is potentially Lucic, and the other is potentially the best defensive forward and near permanent Selke winner for over a decade.
With UFA signings opening up next week the Habs are hard against the cap.The thing though is we don't need to replace him next season. Get a veteran UFA if anything. We'll finish bottom 5 and that's going to pay off.
Love Romanov though. I'm sad.
Edmundson is still there, you see these Debbie downers usually don't even know what they're talking about.Our left side has played zero nhl games combined.. .
Slaf is a power forward archetype while Wright is a two way Selke center archetype. Do you disagree? The point is the risk/reward of passing on the Selke Center makes no sense at all. You have to be sure Wright will bust for it to make a lick of sense.
If Wright is as good as most think he is why did it take 3 teams pass on him?Why did another team not trade up seeing he was still on the board?
Man when management changes you give them a chance. Bergevin was given a clean slate when he joined. Hughes and Gorton have to remodel the roster in their image. They have to be given a shot. You have to give new management a shot to prove themselves. If they’re just crap anytime they do something you disagree with, you’re just a keyboard warrior and you’re wasting your time supporting a team.
Excuse me mister negativity to hope for the best...
Alright I'm now a Debbie downer because I don't see playoffs this yearEdmundson is still there, you see these Debbie downers usually don't even know what they're talking about.
I'd argue Wright is more NHL ready than Slaf. I can see Wright making the Kraken and playing the whole year next year, where I can only really (at this point) envision Slaf playing his 9 games and then going to Laval.They picked Slafkovsky because he was the most NHL ready player
They went after Dach to find a hidden gems instead of taking the time of like drafted Nazar with that 13th overall and they mentioned that picking Slaf was exclusive to that trade, without it, they pick someone else.......that's the shortcut.
When I say fans don't have patience, I mean if the famous category of taking unicorns and then telling fans to ''wait, wait, wait, he's still young, will take a long time, some players takes longer bullshit''. You know the same things we said about KK, Drouin, Galchenyuk and as we did with other players too. We played that game so many times and never won anything.
As you mentioned....longer term project.....shouldn't be cause that's why they get those guys, so it wouldn't be a longer term projects.
Lol. Deslusions already starting.Get back into your cave you troll...
If Price is back, that roster is definitely fighting for a PO spot.
You just said you were trolling the fans here last year because you felt like it.You know, ExpatHabs, I have been patient with you, despite you annoying everyone with your constant tedious repetitive arguments, but if you're gonna be a jack ass I'll do myself the favor of putting you on ignore. I'm not there yet, but I have been nice with you until now.
It’s not because of your post, the negative energy surrounding picks people don’t like does contribute and we all know it.If Slaf does not reach his potential because of my post then he certainly does not have the character to deserve the 1OA.
It is not event that I think Slaf won't be good, it is just as based on risk/reward this is one of the most hugely moronic moves in modern sports history.
It's weird that you didn't get the vibe yet, I'm supporting the Montreal Canadiens doesn't matter who the GM is.Im not mister negativity. I call them as I see them. You'll just blindly follow any GM.
Not expecting PO also but I can still see them make it...Alright I'm now a Debbie downer because I don't see playoffs this year