Kent Hughes interview at Processus
- Thread starter Vachon23
- Start date
-
Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
WeThreeKings
Demidov is a HAB
Anyone willing to highlight any good parts in English?
Leto
Registered User
- Feb 16, 2023
- 1,264
- 2,629
Interesting tidbit: Colorado's GM told Hughes they wanted to take Fowler in the second round with the pick Montreal traded for Newhook. Colorado flipped the picks for Ross Colton to Tampa. If they kept the picks, Fowler would have gone to Colorado with the 37th OV.
Gaylord Q Tinkledink
Registered User
- Apr 29, 2018
- 35,805
- 39,784
Wasn't it the Habs wanted to take Brindley and then Fowler with the picks they dealt for Newhook?
Still got Fowler and not really a fan of Brindley. Not really a fan of Newhook, either, though.
Leto
Registered User
- Feb 16, 2023
- 1,264
- 2,629
Yes. He also added the part about Colorado's interest in Fowler.
Both these things are true, according to Kent.
1- Habs would’ve taken Brindley and Fowler.
2- Had Colorado not traded for Colton, Colorado indeed would’ve picked Fowler with said pick.
Kosseca
Registered User
- Feb 23, 2020
- 1,489
- 1,357
Review of the 15 first min. I have to run and will edit and add the rest if I can find time later
- Discussion on how being an agent help him as a GM. Feel like arriving with knowledge of the player and being able to communicate with them is key. He wanted to develop relations with players. That was also a key asset he wanted in a coach.
-Discussed MLS hiring: Hiring MSL is, thus far, the decision he's the most happy about. Getting him on an interim basis was the best way to bring him over and ensure the decision would be better received by outsiders.
- Discussion on how rumors are started. lots of attention on MTL, some are trues but lots of wrong. He can't deny them all the time... no win situation. He shared a case where he call a media person that was spreading a false rumor and told him to call him instead of doing shit like that. Share that some GM do use the media as a negotiating tactic.
- Discussion on his 1st draft. He feel like being a GM in MTL your like a politician... your approval rating will go up and down. You can only judge your work once you are done. share his decision making process on accepting the job in MTL. Confirm that they spent lots of time looking at prospect and his agent job gave him some insight on some prospect. He defer to the team ultimately but it was an unanimous choice to go with Slaf.
Edit:
- Discussion on USDP and how Hutson was the best player on the team at that moment. He didn't focus on Hutson before the draft. they really put more time on the top 15 guys. Explain that he trusted the recruiting team to draft him in the best spot. This get him to admit they did the same with Fowler, liked him alot but waited to the best spot to draft him. He added that he was interested in Brindley too. He followed up with the story about AVS wanting to draft Fowler in the second round as they not traded their pick. he admitted that would they not have traded for newhook, col would have use their pick for fowler.
- Quick discussion about Snake looking to bring Ken's son in Valdor and Kent to explain that they preferred to play in the US for family reasons.
- Discussion on a "regular day" as a GM. Similar to a player agent, you can't plan you day/week. Very reactive. Explain that from the outside looks like its all hockey, but his job is managing lots of other stuff like interpersonal relation, operation, etc.
- Discussion on development (as part of the team strategy). He define development as ensuring that a player get to play at his best that he can. Each player as a different curve and limit. Speak to communication and how this is important. Give the example of his discussion with Slaf: don't play like Jack Hugues, play like you. Focus on 3 elements: can the player want to learn. can he understand, and can they incorporate it on his game in a very reactive game. Give the example of Brad Marchant being the best player to learn and improve.
- Discussion on how much he's involved in the development of player. He admit it's not common but he has lots of experience in coaching in the pass and he's patinate about helping younger one to improve. He learn a lot about how to manage players. Give the example of Levavalier having hard time with Torts and how he manage to get Lecavalier to change is approach to the game, but more importantly how he also learn how to manage it's relation with the player, including having empathy. Brunet compared Slaf to Lecavalier in term development. Explain that they they barely spoke with Slaf the first year. They know he needed to improve his read, but they didn't want him to play in a level where he would dominate physically.
- Speak to the role of Reinbacher. See him as something like Carrier. He explained that he believe that before the Carrier trade, they had more trouble with pressure then with physical play on defense. See a big difference since Carrier's trade.
- Discussion on public scouting list. Team list are often different then public list.
- Discussion quantity of picks being a good approach. give the chance to find hidden gem or do trade
- Discussion on staggering end of contract. KH explain that contracts ending at the same time give lost of power on the players. Quick discussion on if you expect players to take a discount at some point, you should expect to give a bit more when you have that flexibility (ok... that to me was interesting and telling about what could happen with Evans!!!)
- Snake raise nepotism as a way to hire in the NHL: KH explain it's more about having confidence that someone can do the job. interview rarely bring that level of knowledge. KH like to debate idea and strategy. in 2023, there was little unknown at the draft so they didn't expect to make a decision at the table. in 2024, there was lots of uncertainty and a decision at the table was a strong possibility. He task the 2 scouts (no Nick and Martin could participate) to look at 2 guys. They estimated that Demidov had a 50% change to be available. he was their no1.
- Discussion on what he learn thus far as MTL GM: Learn a lot about hockey ops, but more about the relation between the management team and coaching staff. Coach want to win, management want player development over wins.
-
- Discussion on how being an agent help him as a GM. Feel like arriving with knowledge of the player and being able to communicate with them is key. He wanted to develop relations with players. That was also a key asset he wanted in a coach.
-Discussed MLS hiring: Hiring MSL is, thus far, the decision he's the most happy about. Getting him on an interim basis was the best way to bring him over and ensure the decision would be better received by outsiders.
- Discussion on how rumors are started. lots of attention on MTL, some are trues but lots of wrong. He can't deny them all the time... no win situation. He shared a case where he call a media person that was spreading a false rumor and told him to call him instead of doing shit like that. Share that some GM do use the media as a negotiating tactic.
- Discussion on his 1st draft. He feel like being a GM in MTL your like a politician... your approval rating will go up and down. You can only judge your work once you are done. share his decision making process on accepting the job in MTL. Confirm that they spent lots of time looking at prospect and his agent job gave him some insight on some prospect. He defer to the team ultimately but it was an unanimous choice to go with Slaf.
Edit:
- Discussion on USDP and how Hutson was the best player on the team at that moment. He didn't focus on Hutson before the draft. they really put more time on the top 15 guys. Explain that he trusted the recruiting team to draft him in the best spot. This get him to admit they did the same with Fowler, liked him alot but waited to the best spot to draft him. He added that he was interested in Brindley too. He followed up with the story about AVS wanting to draft Fowler in the second round as they not traded their pick. he admitted that would they not have traded for newhook, col would have use their pick for fowler.
- Quick discussion about Snake looking to bring Ken's son in Valdor and Kent to explain that they preferred to play in the US for family reasons.
- Discussion on a "regular day" as a GM. Similar to a player agent, you can't plan you day/week. Very reactive. Explain that from the outside looks like its all hockey, but his job is managing lots of other stuff like interpersonal relation, operation, etc.
- Discussion on development (as part of the team strategy). He define development as ensuring that a player get to play at his best that he can. Each player as a different curve and limit. Speak to communication and how this is important. Give the example of his discussion with Slaf: don't play like Jack Hugues, play like you. Focus on 3 elements: can the player want to learn. can he understand, and can they incorporate it on his game in a very reactive game. Give the example of Brad Marchant being the best player to learn and improve.
- Discussion on how much he's involved in the development of player. He admit it's not common but he has lots of experience in coaching in the pass and he's patinate about helping younger one to improve. He learn a lot about how to manage players. Give the example of Levavalier having hard time with Torts and how he manage to get Lecavalier to change is approach to the game, but more importantly how he also learn how to manage it's relation with the player, including having empathy. Brunet compared Slaf to Lecavalier in term development. Explain that they they barely spoke with Slaf the first year. They know he needed to improve his read, but they didn't want him to play in a level where he would dominate physically.
- Speak to the role of Reinbacher. See him as something like Carrier. He explained that he believe that before the Carrier trade, they had more trouble with pressure then with physical play on defense. See a big difference since Carrier's trade.
- Discussion on public scouting list. Team list are often different then public list.
- Discussion quantity of picks being a good approach. give the chance to find hidden gem or do trade
- Discussion on staggering end of contract. KH explain that contracts ending at the same time give lost of power on the players. Quick discussion on if you expect players to take a discount at some point, you should expect to give a bit more when you have that flexibility (ok... that to me was interesting and telling about what could happen with Evans!!!)
- Snake raise nepotism as a way to hire in the NHL: KH explain it's more about having confidence that someone can do the job. interview rarely bring that level of knowledge. KH like to debate idea and strategy. in 2023, there was little unknown at the draft so they didn't expect to make a decision at the table. in 2024, there was lots of uncertainty and a decision at the table was a strong possibility. He task the 2 scouts (no Nick and Martin could participate) to look at 2 guys. They estimated that Demidov had a 50% change to be available. he was their no1.
- Discussion on what he learn thus far as MTL GM: Learn a lot about hockey ops, but more about the relation between the management team and coaching staff. Coach want to win, management want player development over wins.
-
Last edited:
sampollock
Registered User
Vachon23
Registered User
Because it wasn’t the goal of the interview. Those questions or for typical Press conference. They wanted to do a different interview on things we don’t know and are not talk about in PC.
Victoire HuGo
Formerly le Barron de HF
We don't know when this interview happened do we? Could have been 2 weeks ago when the parade was still planned
sampollock
Registered User
hope the contract is not a mistake
fat tony says KH said on the french show with snake " say KH pulled him aside" we drafted the wrong guy, we did not draft you to be hughes.
is this correct??
fat tony says KH said on the french show with snake " say KH pulled him aside" we drafted the wrong guy, we did not draft you to be hughes.
is this correct??
Team_Spirit
95% Elliotte
- Jul 3, 2002
- 40,930
- 24,586
WeThreeKings
Demidov is a HAB
No. Hughes took him aside earlier in the year and gave him a pep talk, but he did not say we drafted the wrong guy.
Kobe Armstrong
Registered User
- Jul 26, 2011
- 16,429
- 7,644
IIRC, on marinaro's show they said it was filmed about 2 weeks ago.
WeThreeKings
Demidov is a HAB
My french isn't good enough, but does he mean in the stabilizing sense that Carrier provided?
26Mats
Registered User
- Jun 23, 2018
- 33,854
- 26,251
Victoire HuGo
Formerly le Barron de HF
sampollock
Registered User
WeThreeKings
Demidov is a HAB
Not surprising, Tony has always been a liar and Snake is an idiot.
Kosseca
Registered User
- Feb 23, 2020
- 1,489
- 1,357
in the sense that he can bring solid defensive play under pressure.
They asked him a few time to define what type of player he wanted Reinbacher to be, he never answer the question directly other then to say that similar to Carrier, he'll be good on under pressure and on transition. When on to speak to his view about lack of physical play in their zone vs not managing the pressure and exiting fast.
Vachon23
Registered User
He talk about that pep talk in the podcast. Told him they didn’t draft him to be the next Jack Hughes. You have a skills set Hughes will never have and Hughes avec things Slaf will never have, so if you try to play like him, we should have pick someone else
Latest posts
-
Proposal: Free agency edition Trade Rumours/Proposals [MOD - Stay on Topic] 5
- Latest: Hale The Villain
-
GDT: NY Islanders @ Winnipeg Jets - Friday Feb 7/25 - 700pm CST - TSN3/CJOB/POWER- Latest: The Blue Baron
