mas0764
Registered User
- Jul 16, 2005
- 13,619
- 13,216
They overachieved in prior years and this year they underachieved. It’s variance that happens. The degree this year is beyond reasonable expectations but not unheard of.Can anyone clear up why they think we got most points last season and a ECF to missing this year? Genuinely asking for opinions.
It’s all well and good questioning the coach, the leadership group, the players in general, but what was it that changed so much over the last year in people’s opinion?
I know we over performed (I never thought we were a top 5 team in terms of talent), but aside from the locker room implosion what happened to turn it so we were grossly underperforming as opposed to over performing?
My solution is Drury did what he did and the players reacted badly which I put on everyone including Lavi, but for those who think Drury played it right I just wonder why you think this turnaround happened.
The key takeaway you should be arriving at is that this team is ultimately a joke as a cup contender.
They are low end playoff team talent. And the pipeline is dry. Now beyond clear that they never had enough talent and transitioning from acquiring young talent and building to pissing away your assets before you knew what you had to “win now” with a roster that was never, ever gonna win it all, was a horrible decision.