He leads the team in +/- playing 20 mins a night on our top shutdown pairing...
You're just salty about losing a top 4 RHD for nothing lol.
Keefe snaps on Kovacevic
- Thread starter johnnyonthspot
- Start date
-
We sincerely apologize for the extended downtime. Our hosting provider, XenForo Cloud, encountered a major issue with their backup system, which unfortunately resulted in the loss of some critical data from the past year.
What This Means for You:
- If you created an account after March 2024, it no longer exists. You will need to sign up again to access the forum.
- If you registered before March 2024 but changed your email, username, or password in the past year, those changes were lost. You’ll need to update your account details manually once you're logged in.
- Threads and posts created within the last year have been restored.
Our team is working with Xenforo Cloud to recover data using backups, sitemaps, and other available resources. We know this is frustrating, and we deeply regret the impact on our community. We are taking steps with Xenforo Cloud to ensure this never happens again. This is work in progress. Thank you for your patience and support as we work through this.
In the meantime, feel free to join our Discord Server
You're just salty about losing a top 4 RHD for nothing lol.
Sheldon Keefe has always been a very emotional coach. This is an error in judgement for sure but he will deal with it and fix it. He's a solid coach at the end of the day. People make mistakes.
The 'original comment' said nothing about Keefe not being a good player, and you didn't even bother to quote anyone in your post when responding.
If you already realize that a coach doesn't have to have been a 'good player' in order to be able to criticize one of his players - then why would you proceed to make the fallacious argument of needing to be a hockey coach in order to criticize the conduct of a hockey coach? One cannot address a fallacious argument by proceeding to make additional fallacious arguments. Someone is being 'silly' here, and it isn't me.
Nope. Where did you see me make that argument?
