TwentyFour
Registered User
- Sep 13, 2019
- 12
- 45
The Rangers biggest problem with Kakko was turning him Pro at 18...not a bright move and it leaves a lot youngsters struggling right from the hop...teams need to learn to have the best interest of the player in mind and not the teams selfish short term needsAs a Rangers fan I hope KK does well. That being said, he might be the weirdest player I've ever watched. He has some puck possession skills and can play a defensively responsible game but doesn't know that there's this thing called the middle of the ice. Also not a good finisher (and that's me being nice).
But who knows, the change in scenery could certainly do him good. He just always left Rangers fans wanting more.
Tanev is most certainly gone after this season. With Gourde I am more 70-30. I think he is gone but there is a chance we re-sign him.So with Tanev and Gource also being UFA's at seaons end will they also be heading out?Stay tuned Krakheads
Nationally televised game?Am off topic but why is Forslund doing a Minny vs Florida game tonight Dec 18th,2024
Been watching Kakko since he was drafted and this is all accurate. I’ll miss him a lot. He’s got upside potential but is already a great player.Kakko is a defensive stalwart and puck possession monster. He's fantastic in the corners and in front of the net and still has the same silky hands in tight. His shot leaves a lot to be desired and his skating also isn't great but he does manage to make up for a lot of those qualities with effort. He's just never been given a chance with the Rangers. Same story with Laf before he broke out, he's been pigeonholed into a bottom six role with the org and routinely been scratched for no reason when the veterans are the ones who have given up on the game. Kakko rarely gets frustrated and always gives his all.
Stylistically he reminds me of Burmistrov who's puck handling was great and could skate circles around the offensive zone and was a monster in the corners but just never got anything to show for it. His peak is probably above Bjorkstrands, similar type of player.
Kakko's advanced stats and possession metrics are really really good for a bottom six forward though and I think he could play a really great role in our roster with guys like Wright and Beniers and Sale coming up. Even just as a bottom six defensive guy he's still valuable but I wouldn't be shocked to see double the production come from him if he finds chemistry with our guys and the coaches trust him.
I think he's exactly the type of glue player you want in the bottom six or top six, defensively responsible, great at zone entries and puck retrieval, big and good in front of the net- if he ever just learns how to finish he'll pot 20-40g easy every year. A lot like a Lawson Crouse type of guy.
Personally would put him on the wing of either Beniers or Wright + Tolvanen.
Ottavainen, Kakko and Tolvanen? Now this makes your team even more interestingSo with Borgen's game and physicality traded who steps up Ottavainen has been mentioned and I'm all for that since CFleury is more Offensive but you never know
With Borgen gone,does Mahura get his minutes or Ottavainen or Nelson or CFleuryAn interesting pickup, hard to argue with forwards who play good D.
Despite the rough year I like Borgen, but totally get it if he was leaving after this season anyway.
Something has to give...Bura...Gourde,TanevKraken will be pretty stacked at RW around that top6-9 potential at least. Now and for the future. Pretty deep with Kakko, Tolvanen, Sale, Nyman, Bjorkstrand, Eberle,
I think an obvious second or third order effect from this could be that Borgen has been the only real physical presence the team has had on the blue line, so losing him makes a soft team even softer?
Edit : Enh, maybe not. Hockey Reference says he has 1 fewer hit than Evans and only one more than Larsson...so likely negligible net loss, softness-wise.
don't see kakko playing on the left.Love the trade.
Might we start Kakko with Wright and Bjorkstrand? Offense comes from the forecheck for both Bjorkstrand and Kakko so I think it might be a fit, and it would give him some confidence that he can be a scorer, if they score as much as they have been. Beniers' and McCann's lines play more rush oriented, and they tend to score less as well, so I don't know if putting Kakko with them is as generous to him as folks think it is.