Speculation: Kakko

Status
Not open for further replies.

WhiskeyYerTheDevils

will post scouting reports for food**
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2005
35,703
34,879
**or compliments
This is something I could see.
Rs should not move KK b'c eye test confirms he is very good 5x5, excellent def., proven by 2 versions of kid line; mo upside when he has good linemates.

That said, Jersey enjoying surplus D has Nemec in the A.
Rs are thin on backline.
Swap of former 2OAs

Good first stab, what would you want on a larger deal including rights to Silayev?
Nemec + Silayev
for
KK + __________
No thanks to moving Silayev
 
  • Like
Reactions: bernmeister

elmaco

Registered Hockey Fan
Feb 1, 2017
2,509
1,598
KK should get first line minutes in his new hypothetical destination. I think he's due to atleast a semi-breakout if given consistent opportunity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Svedu

FedorTyutin

Registered User
Jan 10, 2019
312
239
Haven't read all so sorry if this is already written but for me it screams MON's interest towards Kakko.
- 2018 draftee;
- Reclamation project;
- Habs need better defense, Kakko defends well.
- Habs need goalscoring... Huhhh... Well, he was drafted for this 1000 yrs ago but ya know, has a good shot and all;
- Gorton connection.

What we give tho? Either Dach+, Newhook+, Mailloux+, Mešar+ (I know NOBODY WANT TO TOUCH THOSE bur value isn't that high, not giving rental pieces here... So maybe?
 

hamzarocks

Registered User
Jul 22, 2012
21,744
15,390
Pickering, Ontario
He isnt likely to get any better opportunities in Seattle then in NYR.

Tolvonen got dealt from the preds and hasnt become anything of significance either.

Seattle has a lot of good forwards so Kakko will need to compete to get a top 6 role at least this year. Things could open up for him next season
 

Mrfenn92

Proud to be American
Sponsor
Nov 27, 2018
34,115
34,671
Chicago,Illinois
IMG_9991.gif
 
  • Love
Reactions: AlainVigneaultsGum

wintersej

Registered User
Nov 26, 2011
23,496
19,620
North Andover, MA
More


More
also, better deals for NYR-OTT


This is something I could see.
Rs should not move KK b'c eye test confirms he is very good 5x5, excellent def., proven by 2 versions of kid line; mo upside when he has good linemates.

That said, Jersey enjoying surplus D has Nemec in the A.
Rs are thin on backline.
Swap of former 2OAs

Good first stab, what would you want on a larger deal including rights to Silayev?
Nemec + Silayev
for
KK + __________



you know better than that x 2
we want futures and have to be sufficiently high quality to merit consideration
I like Vats, but not for younger guy w/upside



no, need mo/better



well at least yr honest


While we all make mistakes I would not go remotely this far about @Machinehead
I know one arguably actually biased, but I won't say.

back on pt, IMO @Machinehead is just wrong on this particular evaluation



Way to the hell no
and soon as those idiots listen to me and jettison Vesey, Rempe returns!



no, although we could ask Quick who signed here b'c he wants to be here to take one for the team and let us rental him out as expiring
In such instance, would want to promote Garand, no desire for Forsberg, you flip him.

The Rs-Sens deal is
Fox + earlier down the road 2nd [our next is coupla yrs away]
for
Kleven, Pinto + Grieg + later down the road 1st [like 2029-ish]

As spot on in player evaluation as ever.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad

Ad