What separates them is that Lehtinen was voted the best defensive forward in the league 3 times and Kappo hasn't even received a Selke vote. The only players in the history of the award to win it more were Gainey and Bergeron.
Would you diminish Bergeron or Gainey's Selke wins because of their teams success? Carbonneau? Fedorov? Datsyuk? Kopitar? Brind'Amour?
Seems like all the multiple winners played on great teams. Makes you wonder whether great defensive forwards do a lot to make teams great.
Kakko would be very lucky at this point if his ceiling ended up being Lehtinen.
Award trophies are voted upon by people with opinions and credentials.
I think you are cherry picking one very narrow issue and ignoring that one player had a lengthy career and the other is just getting started.
Never, and I stress NEVER once did I state they were of the same caliber. I stated that Kakko is more or less in the mold of and on the same path. YOU chose to go with the absolute hyperbole that 3 Selkes was the pinnacle of greatness and somehow my assessment was fallible.
Did nothing I wrote in between about how Jere deserves his recognition strike a semblance of truth to you?
Stop arguing just for the sake of having an argument. Anyone reading my former posts can see you are cherry picking my post just to argue. I Covered my ass enough that I didn't directly compare the two. I wrote in very specific terms that Jere earned his reputation, but that if I had to pick a player Kakko could wind up emulating over the entirety of his career, it was Jere.
It's okay to make projections, especially when people are calling the kid a bust because he isn't an 80pt 2nd OA player.
My original post was about perspective and the value of players who aren't Super Stars. No need to be a dick because reading comprehension is difficult for you and I didnt meet YOU'RE criteria, letter for letter, of a kid in his 4th year vs a retired vet who did his time over 14 years.
Relax, Francis.