Confirmed Trade: [SEA/NYR] Kaapo Kakko for Will Borgen, 2025 3rd, 2025 6th

eviohh26

Registered User
Dec 19, 2017
5,259
5,498
Victoria BC Canada
That’s what Drury has build

He’s created a complete mess and is trying to trade from that position.

I don’t understand why and how some expect fair value when you are dealing from a position of weakness and not strenght
I don't watch NYR at all. I don't know anything about them other than their struggles this season.

I expected them to be one of the top teams this year .
 

TheOrganist

Don't Call Him Alex
Feb 21, 2006
4,415
2,079
Every time I watched the rangers in the playoffs I’ve never been particularly impressed. He’s had multiple times throughout his career to assert himself into a larger role including last yr playoffs when he was moved up into a scoring role and never stayed.
 

TGWL

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 28, 2011
16,637
11,429
This wasn't for best return. This was a reactionary trade. He opened his mouth and was being delta immediately before the roster freeze.
 

McFlash97

Registered User
Oct 10, 2017
7,880
7,155
Seattle is building quite a team. The roster will be deep in a year or 2. If they draft well, they will be fun to watch.
 

Dead Coyote

Registered User
Oct 10, 2017
2,832
3,385
If the Rangers drafted Hughes do we think he'd be the player he is now or would he be toiling away on the 3rd line with the occasional hint of PP2 time?
Definitely the latter unless he magically meshed with Kreider/Zibenejad with 10m of ice time a game
 

dmcccdmn

Registered User
Dec 10, 2005
1,392
545
UC Davis
Man, this is such a lost opportunity for Grier and the San Jose Sharks. Kaapo Kakko and his age would fit well in their rebuild. My guess is Grier was low-balling the offer and lost out on the bid.

Since it was public knowledge Kaapo Kakko would need to be traded, it's a trading war and Seattle won. If it wasn't a trading war like Askarov, Grier could have better chance.

I'll chalk this up as a win for Seattle and a loss to all other teams.
 

Frank Drebin

Please do your part to end concern trolling
Sponsor
Mar 9, 2004
35,733
23,552
Edmonton
get excited ranger fans

1734577828952.png
 

offdacrossbar

misfit fanboy
Jun 25, 2006
16,117
3,779
da cuse
Let's not forget that KK pretty much sucks.

Aren't we beyond the fallacy of valuing guys based on where they were drafted rather than on their actual ability to play ice hockey.

The return was commensurate with the value of the player. Flip Borgen at the deadline for a 3rd and 5th and then you have two 3s a 5 and a 6.

Overall decent value for a diminished asset.
 
  • Like
Reactions: periferal

periferal

Registered User
Jul 5, 2007
29,362
16,756
  1. Love when people outside the NHL say, "Is that all the GM could get???" Everyone knows that the rangers are open for business so you think that Drury had a much better offer for Kakko and just said, "No thanks - I'll take less from another team."
  2. With that said...This was the market for Kakko. Should tell you what all NHL people think of him, and why I dont think the rangers will regret trading him.
  3. However...Zero downside for Seattle. If Kakko magically puts it together and reaches his potential then wholly shit did Seattle accelerate their build. Even if he becomes a decent 3rd liner, then it was worth it. If he totally flames out then they basically gave up nothing.
 

Dr Jan Itor

Registered User
Dec 10, 2009
46,926
21,660
MinneSNOWta
Does Borgen + 3rd + 6th = a 2nd? Because Kakko for a 2nd seems about right.

I don't really get the whole laughing at the Rangers thing about this. Kakko is a an almost 24 year old very meh player.
 
  • Like
Reactions: periferal

Ad

Ad

Ad