There is no chance he starts in the A and he shouldn't.
How many 18 year olds step into the NHL and look good defensively?
Forget about looking good defensively. Towards the end of the season, he was the lowest rated player in the league.
There is no chance he starts in the A and he shouldn't.
How many 18 year olds step into the NHL and look good defensively?
Way too many plays he was unable to cover his man, some of which directly led to goals.Forget about looking good defensively. Towards the end of the season, he was the lowest rated player in the league.
I think you can be disappointed by the season he had, while also being confident that he's gonna put things together
I'd say if you were disappointed then you were expecting too much from an 18 year old player in his first year playing in North America in the best league in the world.
I'd say if you were disappointed then you were expecting too much from an 18 year old player in his first year playing in North America in the best league in the world.
To expect a 2OA to do better than being almost dead last in the league at various metrics and look generally not so good after being touted as NHL ready isn't really sky high expectations.
Either way, a lot of the deficiencies he exhibited (defensive play and whatnot) can be taught. Not worried at all about how he will turn out.
The stats I brought up--397th out of 410 in P/60 5v5, and dead last in GAR, were current as of March 3, which was like a week before play shut down. It basically reflected the whole season to that point. So, for him to still be that bad after the whole year, he was either a) literally the f***ing worst through the first 30 games, or b) still pretty bad through the second half of the season. At various points over the second half, his game looked like it was turning a corner; then he'd look terrible again. He definitely flashed more in the second half, but overall I don't think he was much better.A lot of those comments about him having the worst season in NHL history were always an overreaction and skewed by his first ~30 games in the NHL. If you look at his second half of the year, his on-ice impacts are still slightly below average, but you can clearly see big improvements on his individual stats and his effect on teammates. There's still more to be desired from him, but I'm going to chalk up his play from Oct through December being due to him being an 18 year old making the jump from Liiga to the NHL.
The stats I brought up--397th out of 410 in P/60 5v5, and dead last in GAR, were current as of March 3, which was like a week before play shut down. It basically reflected the whole season to that point. So, for him to still be that bad after the whole year, he was either a) literally the f***ing worst through the first 30 games, or b) still pretty bad through the second half of the season. At various points over the second half, his game looked like it was turning a corner; then he'd look terrible again. He definitely flashed more in the second half, but overall I don't think he was much better.
I'm still fairly confident he turns into an excellent player, and there's nothing overly concerning about his performance given his age and that he came from Liiga. Still, I don't think we need to sugarcoat his performance as a rookie, which was pretty damn bad. If he was a second round pick and not the second overall, it's hard to imagine he would have played more than a handful of NHL games based on where he was in terms of his development.
JMO.
Where can I get a primer on advanced stats, what the main ones are, and how to understand them?
I think Howden really hurt Kakko’s stats.
Not for the stats people are talking about.His best stretch of hockey was with Howden and Lemieux.
Yes. I thought he improved noticeably this season. Which is the key. Just keep getting better. When he’s on he’s a real threat down low.I'm not disappointed in his season, it's s usually the issue with a player who is good at using his size when you draft them. He was trying to do the same stuff that got him here and players are too strong at the nhl level. I honestly see him as a comparable to Nash, his skating needs work to get to Nash level but basically the same skill set. I see him as too similar in philosophy to play with Chytil which i felt he did a lot this year without looking at the toi, both guys wanna take the puck to the net. If he gets stronger, and gets a little work on his speed, learns to use his linemates a little more effectively, all things young players do a better job of after their first year of learning the North American game, then I have no problem seeing him cracking the top 6 and becoming a 30+ goal scorer within a year or two. It's a big adjustment coming to north america and the style of game played here, from the sounds of him early on it felt like he never dumped and chased before. It's a big adjustment.
Not for the stats people are talking about.
![]()
I agree with you regarding his scoring, but I was mainly referring to his on-ice metrics. I wasn't trying to sugarcoat his performance, but I did want to point out the vast discrepancy in his early performance compared to his second half of the season. At the end of the day, I still think he'll develop into a consistent 75+ point winger. A lot of his issues seem related to his strength and conditioning, which can be fixed rather easily when you have the will and access to the best facilities in the world.The stats I brought up--397th out of 410 in P/60 5v5, and dead last in GAR, were current as of March 3, which was like a week before play shut down. It basically reflected the whole season to that point. So, for him to still be that bad after the whole year, he was either a) literally the f***ing worst through the first 30 games, or b) still pretty bad through the second half of the season. At various points over the second half, his game looked like it was turning a corner; then he'd look terrible again. He definitely flashed more in the second half, but overall I don't think he was much better.
I'm still fairly confident he turns into an excellent player, and there's nothing overly concerning about his performance given his age and that he came from Liiga. Still, I don't think we need to sugarcoat his performance as a rookie, which was pretty damn bad. If he was a second round pick and not the second overall, it's hard to imagine he would have played more than a handful of NHL games based on where he was in terms of his development.
JMO.
The strength and conditioning will really help, but even with that, I think it's the decision-making that needs the most work. There were so many times last year where he'd come flying down the wing and have a great chance to rip on on net, but he'd hesitate and slow down and either flop a sharp-angle wrister right into the goalie's belly, or he'd throw the puck into the middle where it was stolen, or he'd try some weak wraparound. He generated some really good scoring chances that never even ended up with a SOG because he wasn't processing things fast enough. I think this is also why his SH% was so low--he had good opportunities that he turned into non-opportunities.I agree with you regarding his scoring, but I was mainly referring to his on-ice metrics. I wasn't trying to sugarcoat his performance, but I did want to point out the vast discrepancy in his early performance compared to his second half of the season. At the end of the day, I still think he'll develop into a consistent 75+ point winger. A lot of his issues seem related to his strength and conditioning, which can be fixed rather easily when you have the will and access to the best facilities in the world.