I don't blame people getting riled up for yet another Ehlers demotion. It doesn't even matter if he had a bad game - because he's basically the only guy for whom it works like that. For certain guys having a bad game, or 2, or 3 doesn't mean a thing, but for Ehlers having a bad period means he is in line 2 or 3. I mean he can play well and will still get demoted. I think at this point it should be clear to anyone it's really not about anything else than Maurice flat out not liking his game, no matter how well it works. It used to be like that for Laine as well, until he completely changed how he plays.
I even kind of understand Maurice, I mean if he demands certain type of game from players and one guy keeps doing things his way, of course it will rub the coach the wrong way. But since Ehlers' game obviously works, the coach should also look in the mirror and think long and hard about his systems and how to utilize guy like Ehlers without having to ask him to become a completely different player. He should've thought about that with Laine as well. I'm not necessarily arguing that the way Laine has been developed has been wrong, I mean clearly he is a very good hockey player and his two-way game is on a completely different level compared to his first seasons, but he's also several years older and physically more mature, so it's entirely possible he would be even better player if Maurice had let him just play to his strengths and built something around that.
It's not all bad what Maurice is doing, but a lot of the time his roster management can make you crazy. Also the complete double standard, when has he ever called out Wheels for anything, or couple other players? Yet he'll throw Ehlers under the bus for anything, despite Ehlers being consistently one of the best 5v5 guys in the team.