- Jul 30, 2005
- 2,674
- 4,089
It was nice seeing him score a goal off the rush and beat the goalies from a distance, I sometimes forgot he has a nice shot
It’s a bit disingenuous to say that at this moment, he is not worth the money that starts next year. At this age, a good offseason/maturity can change a player night and day. We talked a lot about Thornton/Rantanen production that spiked after 40-50 points seasons. I’m not saying that he will reach 100pts, but let’s evaluate his 7 million-ish contract at thé statt of his contract… I Still believe that those contracts are made to overpay a bit at the beginning of the contract to eventually be cheap at his Prime (sharp in a rebuilding team)Yeah he was often invisible. Compared to his line mates he was. Just need to read the recent GDTs. Alot of people been saying it. He's probablygonna get around 45 points while his line mates are getting 70+ . I think it's normal to be critical of a 1st overall who is already in his third season.
I'm sorry but at this moment Slaf contract starting next season is simply not worth what we be paying. Can he get better yes. Is he the reason why his line his doing well? No.
I think some people gotta see both sides of arguments before just stating random one sided opinions
I think he does too.It was nice seeing him score a goal off the rush and beat the goalies from a distance, I sometimes forgot he has a nice shot
That's why he's not signed for just next year at whatever he's going to be making.Yeah he was often invisible. Compared to his line mates he was. Just need to read the recent GDTs. Alot of people been saying it. He's probablygonna get around 45 points while his line mates are getting 70+ . I think it's normal to be critical of a 1st overall who is already in his third season.
I'm sorry but at this moment Slaf contract starting next season is simply not worth what we be paying. Can he get better yes. Is he the reason why his line his doing well? No.
I think some people gotta see both sides of arguments before just stating random one sided opinions
He just needs a little more consistency.............that said, coming out of a 12 day break, he has been just that.He has a shot at exceeding 50 points again
Which is funny because a goal is a goal. We’d be lucky if he had a similar career to Ryan Smyth, the king of garbage goalsSomeone was mentioning on here they wish that Slaf would score a nice goal for a change instead of a deflection or a garbage goal in front of the net. That poster got their wish last night!
It was nice seeing him score a goal off the rush and beat the goalies from a distance, I sometimes forgot he has a nice shot
Yeah he was often invisible. Compared to his line mates he was. Just need to read the recent GDTs. Alot of people been saying it. He's probablygonna get around 45 points while his line mates are getting 70+ . I think it's normal to be critical of a 1st overall who is already in his third season.
I'm sorry but at this moment Slaf contract starting next season is simply not worth what we be paying. Can he get better yes. Is he the reason why his line his doing well? No.
I think some people gotta see both sides of arguments before just stating random one sided opinions
He’s on track for 50pts
But he’s starting to.He has a good shot. But if you look at the velocity stats, he barely ever uses it.
Yup. He's still 20 years old.That's why he's not signed for just next year at whatever he's going to be making.
People said the same thing about Nick Suzuki when he signed his extension, how's that looking now?
It’s a bit disingenuous to say that at this moment, he is not worth the money that starts next year. At this age, a good offseason/maturity can change a player night and day. We talked a lot about Thornton/Rantanen production that spiked after 40-50 points seasons. I’m not saying that he will reach 100pts, but let’s evaluate his 7 million-ish contract at thé statt of his contract… I Still believe that those contracts are made to overpay a bit at the beginning of the contract to eventually be cheap at his Prime (sharp in a rebuilding team)
I’d throw in Hutson too. Kids gonna be a game breakerSome really good times ahead. Him and Demidov at age 23-28 will be must-watch TV.
Or, what is interesting is comparing the value 7.6 will be in 26/27 and 27/28.Agreed. Also should consider where the cap is going:
$7.6m in 25/26 = $8.3m in 26/27 = $9.1m in 27/28.
Exactly who I hope he'd model his play around, 'cause with his body he'd be legendary.Which is funny because a goal is a goal. We’d be lucky if he had a similar career to Ryan Smyth, the king of garbage goals
Lafleur scored 21 goals in year 3 and most were starting to think he was not going to become the player they thought he would...Yup. He's still 20 years old.
Nathan MacKinnon had 53 points in his 4th full season in the NHL. So many barely casual hockey fans in here who don't understand development cycles.
I would just have bridged him. it was to earlyReally? So what do you believe an $8M in 2028 AAV is? His contract represents inflated cap not todays cap.
FYI, todays $5M-$6M player will be 2028 $8M player….. that’s a 40-50 pts player in todays NHL
I find that this last game and the one right after the 4 nations were the best I've ever seen from him. He's a dominant force when he's on and a rare breed of player.Yup. He's still 20 years old.
Nathan MacKinnon had 53 points in his 4th full season in the NHL. So many barely casual hockey fans in here who don't understand development cycles.