austin316
Registered User
- Oct 4, 2016
- 1,622
- 2,016
Doesn’t move his feet, doesn’t shoot, is rarely physically engaged in the game. It seems so simple what he needs to do in order to succeed, but he refuses to commit. Disappointing player.
Unfortunately this is the norm in the league and one I really don't care for. Seems like many players these days don't earn their big deal and everything is based on projections and wishful thinking.That gave him the big contract too quick
"Called him out" He was bullied by a bunch of people who insisted that their incredibly wrong take on player development was the only one that could be uttered around here.The point is all of these young players will have ups and downs. Where were you last year when Slaf put up 50? That’s right, you went into hiatus because everyone called you out.
See? You're doing it again. Any realistic view on Slafkovsky and what he needs/needed to develop is considered hating around here. Show us where ReHabs is "back to hating".Then you claimed you weren’t a hater and now you’re back hating because he’s in a slump.
I put in Caufield to highlight that his rookie season was the same season (D+3) that Slaf is currently in and their stats are similar. Caufield had room to improve and still does. As does Slaf.
He reminds a bit of Richard Zednik.
Where are you seeing this? Wouldn’t surprise me reallyThere are enough anecdotal stories about Slafkovsky + Xhekaj out on the town, now the media is starting to report it as a problem.
I don't care what a player does off ice as long as they perform, but someone needs to get his head on straight and remind him that it's a lot easier to become the next Galchenyuk than the next Rantanen.
It would be easier if he didn't already get his big contract, but now we have to teach him how to care.
You people take yourselves way too seriously, that's why the rest are always laughing."Called him out" He was bullied by a bunch of people who insisted that their incredibly wrong take on player development was the only one that could be uttered around here.
He was ridiculed, and accused of being a hater because he had a more educated opinion on what the player needed to grow to his full potential.
See? You're doing it again. Any realistic view on Slafkovsky and what he needs/needed to develop is considered hating around here. Show us where ReHabs is "back to hating".
coulda shoulda woulda. Playing that game would never end. We could do that endlessly.That is kinda disingenuous as Caufield would probably have ended-up with close to 60-70 points if he had Marty as coach for the whole season.
coulda shoulda woulda. Playing that game would never end. We could do that endlessly.
What do you think Slaf was shooting during his "breakout" last seasonWho f***ing cares if he does? Shane couldn’t even put up 50 points in the AHL last season when Slaf did it in the NHL. You’re proving his point that progression isn’t linear.
I mean Shane is shooting at 20%. Very sustainable numbers. He’s basically Jake Evans this season with zero impact on the PK.
If they drafted him to be a mean power forward type that was extremely poor scouting as that's not what he was at any level.That s true but then you don t give him a 8m contract for 8 years if he is a project during 5 of those years.
If I understood correctly Hughes said they drafted him to be a power forward and now he is playing like a Finesse Player and that if he continues to play like that they drafted the wrong player. I think this is a fair assessment, Slaf has strength and can overpower oponents but not in his nature. I think he has a good vision but not the Processing power to consistently make plays at NHL Level. In Junior / in International Games he was a real line driver but he is not showing he can be that yet, he is more a complementary player to Suzuki and CC.
Jury is still out there if he ends up being the correct choice or not.
Not 20%What do you think Slaf was shooting during his "breakout" last season