VintageBure
Registered User
- Jun 7, 2018
- 504
- 430
Life happens and everyone may need to take time off work or hobbies to re set. I predict we will see the best version of JT when he’s back.
Its not the same. You are hidden, possibly 1000s of miles away.
Its definitely anonymity still.
Not just that.
You dont feel the same kind of empathy because they are typing at a screen.
If you said these things and saw someone change their facial expressions in real time as they go through the negative emotions you are causing.... and able to post the vile shit, you are probably someone that should be watched very carefully.
Yep.
I was wondering this myself. It's kind of unintended load management with JT and Demko.Life happens and everyone may need to take time off work or hobbies to re set. I predict we will see the best version of JT when he’s back.
Petterson has been playing though it all, while being called a baby by Miller and getting way more pressure in the media.Life happens and everyone may need to take time off work or hobbies to re set. I predict we will see the best version of JT when he’s back.
Petterson has been playing though it all, while being called a baby by Miller and getting way more pressure in the media.
I really doubt that it is just that.
He never implied anything about EP40?Petterson has been playing though it all, while being called a baby by Miller and getting way more pressure in the media.
I really doubt that it's that
It just might be that someone struggled amongst rumours he might want to force his way out of Vancouver then got a massive raise leaving nothing on the table and followed by being bad and soft during the Canucks best chance to win since 2012 and have nothing to do with Miller??Yep some posters here have said absolutely horrible things about Pettersson but are now giving Miller a pass.
I think both players are super important for this team but worth mentioning Pettersson just kept playing through his issues despite all the hate. You'd think after having Naslund and the Sedins be the faces of this franchise for so many years that fans would be ok with personalities that aren't just "big macho hockey guy" but the Don Cherry caveman attitude persists.
People are 1,000% more brave when they aren't in actually front of people. I don't think it's consequences, they've removed themselves from the fact there's a legitimate human on the other side. 0 forks given. In person, they often turn to muffins.I really don't think the anonymity is a factor. Like I said, people say vile stuff on Facebook, and for most people, that is their real name/identity. Hell, some of the worst posters/takists on Twitter use their real names. I think using their real names actually might drive even worse commentary - related to my point about social media incentives, it gives them more notoriety and drives their following. More attention.
I think this point is more or less related to my point about a lack of "consequences" for not ever really interacting with the person.
It just might be that someone struggled amongst rumours he might want to force his way out of Vancouver then got a massive raise leaving nothing on the table and followed by being bad and soft during the Canucks best chance to win since 2012 and have nothing to do with Miller??
History repeats itself. Every time a new communications medium takes over, it has been co-opted by disinformation spreaders as well as revolutionaries.
In the mid 1800s it was the "wide awakes" revolution driven by the literacy boom and the printing press - hordes of people literally threw printing presses into rivers from authors they hated. This led to Lincoln's rise and the civil war.
How a Newspaper Revolution Led to the 'Wide Awakes'—and the Civil War
In the mid-1800s, a boom in media outlets created a massive political movement—and plenty of disinformation.www.atlasobscura.com
In the early 1900s it was radio and later, TV fueling nationalism and two world wars.
Today it's the Internet and especially social media driving disinformation, manipulation and polarization.
It's not a good look if history is any guide.
The funny thing to me is I think EP is a little too macho for his own good, he wants to hit and be physical a little too much and he's overly stoic. It's just that somehow in hockey culture stoicism and emotional control are seen as not manly, and temper tantrums are seen as displays of manliness, a notion that is ass backwards to how most of the rest of the world views it.Yep some posters here have said absolutely horrible things about Pettersson but are now giving Miller a pass.
I think both players are super important for this team but worth mentioning Pettersson just kept playing through his issues despite all the hate. You'd think after having Naslund and the Sedins be the faces of this franchise for so many years that fans would be ok with personalities that aren't just "big macho hockey guy" but the Don Cherry caveman attitude persists.
The people they are responding to are not physical humans but pictures and names.I really don't think the anonymity is a factor. Like I said, people say vile stuff on Facebook, and for most people, that is their real name/identity. Hell, some of the worst posters/takists on Twitter use their real names. I think using their real names actually might drive even worse commentary - related to my point about social media incentives, it gives them more notoriety and drives their following. More attention.
I think its more about our empathy / sympathy circuits not firing because of the things I mentioned.I think this point is more or less related to my point about a lack of "consequences" for not ever really interacting with the person.
No there is 100% a double standard.This Miller vs Pettersson diatribe never ends... jeesh
He never implied anything about EP40?
It just might be that someone struggled amongst rumours he might want to force his way out of Vancouver then got a massive raise leaving nothing on the table and followed by being bad and soft during the Canucks best chance to win since 2012 and have nothing to do with Miller??