Proposal: Josh Anderson to Maple Leafs

I am Canadian

AM34|WN88|MM16
May 22, 2008
6,676
2,824
Toronto
I'd be in favour of this, Anderson is always such a pain to play against.

No idea what Montreal is planning this offseason - feel like they could be trying a retool and would probably want to keep him.
 

AuraSphere

Registered User
Jun 27, 2012
4,286
2,415
With what cap hit? If you think trading Nylander for Anderson is the solution you're mistaken
 

DingDongCharlie

Registered User
Sep 12, 2010
11,690
9,792
I’d think you’d have to put Sandin on the table. How would the cap work though? Montreal could probably eat a cap dump if they go all in on the rebuild vs trying a retool.
 

Ezpz

No mad pls
Apr 16, 2013
15,295
11,797
Mrazek, secondary dump, 1st, Knies.

Habs can retain for more. Habs aren't really looking to move him, he's a good character guy who plays the "right way".
 

nhlfan9191

Registered User
Aug 4, 2010
20,008
18,214
With what cap hit? If you think trading Nylander for Anderson is the solution you're mistaken
As a Habs fan, I’m not delusional. I get Nylander is likely the odd man out of the 4 money forwards if you’re to make room for a guy like Anderson and he has more value then Anderson 1 for 1 obviously. But that doesn’t mean there isn’t some deal that could be made. I personally like Nylander. I don’t think Anderson makes sense for us not because of cap but because he should be on a team looking to capitalize in the next 3 years. Just how far apart are we?
 

majormajor

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
26,774
32,925
I think the Leafs should follow the Tampa model. The Tampa model is to get that super 3rd line comparable to Goodrow-Gourde-Coleman. They're trying it again getting Hagel and Paul this year.

Josh Anderson adds the on ice element but he doesn't fit that model in terms of cap hit. Tampa spent multiple 1sts to get those low cap-hit players - 2 1sts for Hagel, 1 for Goodrow, Foote and a 1st for Coleman, and Mathieu Joseph went for Paul. That's a lot but it works. So unless the Leafs are paying big assets to get Josh Anderson at 50% cap, then it doesn't fit. I don't think it makes sense at all to swap Nylander for Anderson, that is more lateral.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SamHabsFan

Phion Keneuf

Bang Bang
Jul 4, 2010
35,588
6,805
Mrazek, Kerfoot/Engvall, 2022 1st, 2nd/B prospect
For
Anderson, Allen

Essentially 1st + Kerfoot/Engvall for Anderson, Mrazek + 2nd/B prospect for Allen
 
  • Like
Reactions: wildD

Big Empty

He's a big horse
Jan 27, 2020
4,393
8,023
Montréal
As a Habs fan, I sadly can’t chirp the Laffs about not winning a cup recently. I can sure as shit chirp them for not making it out of the first round in the past billion years though. It’s even more satisfying knowing we denied them a series win last year.
 

Gravity

Generational Poster
Feb 27, 2017
12,404
20,892
In a Barred Spiral
As a Habs fan, I sadly can’t chirp the Laffs about not winning a cup recently. I can sure as shit chirp them for not making it out of the first round in the past billion years though. It’s even more satisfying knowing we denied them a series win last year.
Can't believe I have to defend the Leafs but this is a trade proposal thread, not bash the Leafs some more. I can fully understand why Anderson's cap hit would be worrisome for a contending team.
 

AuraSphere

Registered User
Jun 27, 2012
4,286
2,415
As a Habs fan, I’m not delusional. I get Nylander is likely the odd man out of the 4 money forwards if you’re to make room for a guy like Anderson and he has more value then Anderson 1 for 1 obviously. But that doesn’t mean there isn’t some deal that could be made. I personally like Nylander. I don’t think Anderson makes sense for us not because of cap but because he should be on a team looking to capitalize in the next 3 years. Just how far apart are we?
It really doesn't make much sense from a Leafs perspective. If we wanted to take on that big of a cap hit and needed a player like Anderson - we would have just kept Hyman who's ask was 5M from the leafs
 

Twisted Sinister

Living in Your Head Rent Free
Oct 8, 2014
2,052
3,089
I think he'd be a useful player for you guys, but that cap hit is tough given your situation
Mrazek, Kerfoot/Engvall, 2022 1st, 2nd/B prospect
For
Anderson, Allen

Essentially 1st + Kerfoot/Engvall for Anderson, Mrazek + 2nd/B prospect for Allen
I think Anderson has more worth than a late pick and Allen has more worth as a rental than a second.
.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BernieParent

RationalExpectations

Registered User
May 12, 2019
5,219
4,046
Mrazek, Kerfoot/Engvall, 2022 1st, 2nd/B prospect
For
Anderson, Allen

Essentially 1st + Kerfoot/Engvall for Anderson, Mrazek + 2nd/B prospect for Allen

I think that's bad for the Habs. Allen has a very good contract, would likely be worth 2nd/2nd+3rd without Mrazek as a dump.
Anderson likely returns 1st + good prospect, which would be more interesting than Bottom 6 forwards in my opinion.
 

ginovegas

Registered User
Dec 15, 2009
1,501
29
Montreal
don't the Leafs already have Marner and Nylander at right wing? Plus although Sandin might be a nice sophmore Habs are stacked on left D for a while. Edmunston, Romanov, Guhle, Harris, Norlinder, and probably another half dozen B prospects
 

jfhabs

Registered User
May 21, 2015
5,142
2,610
Mrazek, secondary dump, 1st, Knies.

Habs can retain for more. Habs aren't really looking to move him, he's a good character guy who plays the "right way".
Yeah something like that. Dont really want to face him within the devision for the next 5years tbh
 

jfhabs

Registered User
May 21, 2015
5,142
2,610
Mrazek, Kerfoot/Engvall, 2022 1st, 2nd/B prospect
For
Anderson, Allen

Essentially 1st + Kerfoot/Engvall for Anderson, Mrazek + 2nd/B prospect for Allen
I like Kerfoot, not sure why every leafs fan wants to trade him, he's good depth. I'd say no to this or both offers from Habs pov. I'd hope for more then a late first for Anderson. I'd prefer keeping Allen, probably cost a 2nd just to dump Mrazek
 

Tufted Titmouse

13 Cups.
Apr 5, 2022
6,222
8,322
At that cap hit there are definitely better options. JT Miller makes significantly more sense since they are similar style players but 1 is way better than the other
JT Miller also only has 1 year of control, and yet, would still cost more. Those aren't comparable trades.

I like Anderson. I don't know if we have good enough assets to entice the Habs without dipping into guys like Robertson and Knies, and that's a tough sell for a team that needs ELCs. Unless management makes some bigger moves, this one feels unlikely.

I like Kerfoot, not sure why every leafs fan wants to trade him, he's good depth. I'd say no to this or both offers from Habs pov. I'd hope for more then a late first for Anderson. I'd prefer keeping Allen, probably cost a 2nd just to dump Mrazek
I don't think there is anything wrong with Kerfoot himself, it's that we have 7-9 other players who essentially play the same style of game. Kerfoot would be the most useful of the ones we have with control.
 

Ezpz

No mad pls
Apr 16, 2013
15,295
11,797
We’re hoping Knies can turn into a better version of Josh Anderson don’t see the leafs doing this at all
Hope doesn't equal trade value though. Anderson is an asset the majority of GMs in the league would be bidding on.

We had to add to a top 6 guy(who can play center, at least offensively) who was one year removed from a 70-point season to get Anderson at his lowest point(injured with concerns of coming back to form). Anderson is an absolute menace to play against, particularly in the playoffs. If you put him on your top line he will put up points because he's always going to the right areas.

On top of that he's just hit his prime and is locked up for the remainder of it at a cap hit that won't matter when the cap jumps in two seasons.

Matthews won't even be in Toronto, if the Leafs continue to "wait and see" and go out first round, when Knies is on Anderson's level(if he can even get there). The Leafs window is much smaller than the fans want to admit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: xxsciroccoxx

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad