Josh Anderson M-NTC

[Tyson]

The thing that I would worry about with Anderson is if he were to be on a good line he may get you 20-25 goals, but miss a ton more, and kill plays with his bad puck skills. So he may not be the right fit. So where does he fit? I don't know. I definitely feel comfortable with him doing a good job on a 4th line with Evans and Gallagher. But it would be hard for him to produce from there. I like Roy - Newhook/Dvo - Armia best as a 3rd line. And of those 4, the one that isn't on that line is next to Laine and Dach.

When you get top line minutes and PP time and produce 9 goals I think the ship has sailed hoping for Anderson to produce on any line.

 

[GrandBison]

When you get top line minutes and PP time and produce 9 goals I think the ship has sailed hoping for Anderson to produce on any line.

I don't see him getting PP minutes anymore. If he get his scoring touch back, he could be useful against 3rd pairing defensemen and could create some space for Roy on the third.

 

[FerrisRox]

I also suspect that his body is starting to fail him and that it will only get worse and worse.

This is an odd take coming off a 78-game season, the most he's played as a Canadien.

 

[Tyson]

I don't see him getting PP minutes anymore. If he get his scoring touch back, he could be useful against 3rd pairing defensemen and could create some space for Roy on the third.

He has the size, speed and shot. What he needs to do is fight Dmen for space and score some dirty goals. Damn he once scored 27 goals in a season...what happened?

 

[FerrisRox]

When you get top line minutes and PP time and produce 9 goals I think the ship has sailed hoping for Anderson to produce on any line.

You are saying this in the Montréal Canadiens forum, where it should be expected that a lot of the people, you know, watch the games, so why would you make something up that is so obviously false when you know everyone will be able to spot right away that it's a fabrication?

Josh Anderson 9th among forwards for time on ice, and you're here claiming he got "top line minutes." I mean ... why? Why make that up?

 

[Tyson]

You are saying this in the Montréal Canadiens forum, where it should be expected that a lot of the people are, you know, watch the games, so why would you make something up that is so obviously false when you know everyone will be able to spot right away that it's a fabrication?

Josh Anderson 9th among forwards for time on ice, and you're here claiming he got "top line minutes." I mean ... why? Why make that up?

He started the year on the top 2 lines with PP time. It dwindled throughout the year as his play wasn't improving. Listen man I watch the games I don't need people throwing stats when you see how bad he played last season. Maybe his ice time started to dwindle after having a 30 game goalless streak.

Sorry...never mind...Josh Anderson had an amazing year and could have scored a 10th goal had he received top 6 minutes the entire season...happy?

 

[FerrisRox]

Anderson has never been a legitimate top 6 player. He is maybe a 3rd line player who should play a hard north south game.

Again you're just gonna make something up?

Just to be clear, you don't think that Josh Anderson scoring 27-goals and 49 points for the Jackets in 2018-19 was the performance of a Top-6 player?

Grossly exaggerating your claims doesn't make your point better, it makes you look like a liar at worst and misinformed at best.

If he can do that playing bottom line minutes I will be impressed. What was the excuse last season? Didn't he go 30 games without a goal? What makes him rebound from a 9 goal season?

Just throwing this out there: Maybe playing with a legitimate NHL centre would help?

 

[Tyson]

Delete

 

[FerrisRox]

He started the year on the top 2 lines with PP time. It dwindled throughout the year as his play wasn't improving. Listen man I watch the games I don't need people throwing stats when you see how bad he played last season. Maybe his ice time started to dwindle after having a 30 game goalless streak.

Right. So you believe when someone says a player had "top line minutes" it means that one time he played on the top line?

Are you serious with this?

Instead of admitting you were wrong and were way off on his ice time, you actually expect us to believe that what you meant was he played on the top line at one point last year?

Are you for real?

And you're telling me that you don't need people "throwing stats?" You realize my post was a response to the stats that you gave, that you made up.

And then after all that, you want to shift the goalposts and pretend the post was about whether Josh Anderson played well last season?

What's going on here?

 

[Tyson]

Right. So you believe when someone says a player had "top line minutes" it means that one time he played on the top line?

Are you serious with this?

Instead of admitting you were wrong and were way off on his ice time, you actually expect us to believe that what you meant was he played on the top line at one point last year?

Are you for real?

And you're telling me that you don't need people "throwing stats?" You realize my post was a response to the stats that you gave, that you made up.

And then after all that, you want to shift the goalposts and pretend the post was about whether Josh Anderson played well last season?

What's going on here?

Do yourself a favor and start a poll on this site and ask people what they thought of how horrible Josh Anderson was last year. You might be surprised that you will not like the results.
I didn't shift the goal posts- my initial thoughts on Anderson was that he couldn't score on any line, couldn't score on the PP, rarely stood up for teammates and basically was an absolute waste of cap space. If you aren't going to score at least contribute in other ways.

Did I make up the fact that he didn't score in his first 30 games despite getting top 6 minutes and PP time?
Maybe his ice time was 9th best on the team. Once he was removed from the PP and never killed penalties it makes sense that his ice time dwindled.

 

[FerrisRox]

Do yourself a favor and start a poll on this site and ask people what they thought of how horrible Josh Anderson was last year. You might be surprised that you will not like the results.

Oh boy.

You are no having a debate with yourself. I have no clue why you are telling me about this poll. At no point did I, or anybody actually, in this thread say Josh Anderson was good last year.

You literally already tried to move the goal posts to this in your last response, and I told you then that you were shifting the goalposts. Nobody is disputing that Josh Anderson was lousy last year.

I have taken exception to two claims you have made in this thread. 1) You said Josh Anderson had "top line minutes." I corrected you and told you he actually ranked 9th in forward ice time, you know, third line minutes. 2) You claimed that Josh Anderson has never been a top-6 player and I pointed out he had a 27-goal, 47-point season which would be awfully difficult to achieve playing in the bottom six.

Did I make up the fact that he didn't score in his first 30 games despite getting top 6 minutes and PP time?

Again, you are arguing with yourself now. Nobody has made any mention of a 30-game drought except you. If you just want to argue with yourself, you don't need the internet.

To be clear, before you start asking other random questions not connected to what we're talking about, let me recap: The things you made up in this thread 1) Josh Anderson had top line minutes for the Canadiens last year and 2) Josh Anderson was never a Top 6 Forward.

Those are the two things. Nothing else (so far.)

Maybe his ice time was 9th best on the team. Once he was removed from the PP and never killed penalties it makes sense that his ice time dwindled.

First of all, not maybe, it's a fact, not an opinion, that Josh Anderson was 9th in ice time for forwards. Secondly, why are you explaining to me why his ice time was low? I'm the one that told you he had low ice time, you're the one claiming he had "topline minutes."

It's one thing to argue with yourself, it's a whole other thing to get confused about what side you are on.

 

[Tyson]

Oh boy.

You are no having a debate with yourself. I have no clue why you are telling me about this poll. At no point did I, or anybody actually, in this thread say Josh Anderson was good last year.

You literally already tried to move the goal posts to this in your last response, and I told you then that you were shifting the goalposts. Nobody is disputing that Josh Anderson was lousy last year.

I have taken exception to two claims you have made in this thread. 1) You said Josh Anderson had "top line minutes." I corrected you and told you he actually ranked 9th in forward ice time, you know, third line minutes. 2) You claimed that Josh Anderson has never been a top-6 player and I pointed out he had a 27-goal, 47-point season which would be awfully difficult to achieve playing in the bottom six.




Again, you are auguring with yourself now. Nobody has made any mention of a 30-game drought except you. If you just want to argue with yourself, you don't need the internet.

To be clear, before you start asking other random questions not connected to what we're talking about, let me recap: The things you made up in this thread 1) Josh Anderson had top line minutes for the Canadiens last year and 2) Josh Anderson was never a Top 6 Forward.

Those are the two things. Nothing else (so far.)



First of all, not maybe, it's a fact not an opinion, that Josh Anderson was 9th in ice time for forwards. Secondly, why are you explaining to me why his ice time was low? I'm the one that told you he had low ice time, you're the one claiming he had "topline minutes."

It's one thing to argue with yourself, it's a whole other thing to get confused about what side you are on.

Man it must be amazing to be so brilliant and have the capacity to break down posts like this. I am a fan who made an opinion on Josh Anderson that you felt you had to correct. Outstanding work. I never ignore posters but I have a difficult time with holier than though posters who know it all, people who are also condescending. I am moving on from this. Please feel free to dissect my inaccuracies in this post since you are very adept at doing that.