I think there is a recency bias there. If Woll's best is better and he has fewer bad games how is he .905 to
Stolarz' .917 unless you are only looking at March? That's really quite a bit of separation. Dangle did a bit in December with before the injury numbers where he talked about the shot differential. When .927 Stolarz was in net., 436-475 and when .918 Woll was in net it was 314-275 so it seems like Woll may have been benefiting from better play in front of him.
Give or take, Woll has had 16 of 38 starts .890 or lower and Stolarz 9 of 28 of which 4 came in his wretched month of March. I would agree Stolarz has been weaker than Woll post injury but I think that's "bad" vs "not good" rather than either one carrying the load.
I don't know if the pre injury shot differentials are still the same and I'm not sure how much that matters now. If pre-injury Stolarz is coming back he is my guy, but if he isn't, to me it could be Woll as he looked pretty strong against the Bs when Sammy was getting rolled. Somebody has to step up because they were doing doing it in the first half so it should still be there right?.