Micklebot
Moderator
- Apr 27, 2010
- 62,739
- 49,374
We scored at double the rate with Chabot on the pp compared to Spence, so if you care about scoring, no he was notHe's better than Chabot on pp2
We scored at double the rate with Chabot on the pp compared to Spence, so if you care about scoring, no he was notHe's better than Chabot on pp2
if the sens have concerns then just take him to arb and put him on a prove it again deal.To play devils advocate....perhaps the team thinks his performance this season was an outlier, because it's a contract year? That's the only way any of this would make sense.
Spence was fantastic for us, especially near the end of the season. But maybe the team think he can't do it over a longer term.
I would love to get him signed for a 2 year contract for $3.5-4.5. That's enough time to get Yak acclimatized, and 2 years is little risk for the Sens. (But I doubt that will get it done with the hype happening now.)
Which defensemen are you talking about? List a playerWho are these folk you're referring to?
I like Spence as a player, but if they move him then it's not an issue of whether or not he's good. It's about fit. They obviously feel that they need a rangy strong skater defender with size and physicality to play in the top 4 and PK, and that's probably more important than having a small puck mover who ideally plays on the third pairing when we already have elite puck movers in Sanderson and Chabot.