I haven't stated any opinion to you in my posts. I've simply corrected you when you mentioned the team potentially walking away from the player. I clarified the logic behind why that could happen because you clearly didn't understand it.Here you go again stating your opinion is smarter than writers.
I'll quote Bruce Mccurdy for you on AA regular season time with Oilers.
Either way, it is clear that A.A. will need a strong playoff performance to salvage a poor regular season. An especially disappointing one after the 30-goal campaign he recorded in Detroit just one season prior. Of course if he’d continued at that rate he wouldn’t have been available at the deadline for a couple of second-round picks if at all, and his next extension would be a whole lot more expensive once the two-year, $3.0 million AAV contract he signed in 2018 expires after the playoffs. Instead, said renewal represents something of a conundrum for Ken Holland.
In our customary manner, we show just the player’s stats as an Oiler on the “player card” that accompanies each review. Not much to see here in a positive sense, just 2 points, some pretty dodgy ice time and shot metrics, and a truly horrid average game grade of just 4.1, lowest of any Oiler all season.
But yes Oilers fan know more than the writers.
This is the first bit of actual substance you've provided in this thread and it shows a player who played in nine regular season games with limited ice time at 5-on-5 and next to no PP.
Explain to me how those nine games provide a more accurate window into what the player offers than the previous 200 of his career?