Edward Richtofen
Registered User
- Dec 9, 2020
- 95
- 73
I wanted to add more speed on that line that’s why I put Byron on the left.Toffili with kk and armia maybe
I wanted to add more speed on that line that’s why I put Byron on the left.Toffili with kk and armia maybe
if you are not sure why people are freaking out, I have to ask have you seen Jonathan Drouin play ?Not sure why people are freaking out on JD playing with Suzuki and Anderson. JD was playing well with Suzuki and if it doesn't work well we actually now have options to move him up and down the line up.
As a Hab’s fan would you say Drouin has the God given gifts to be a valuable top six player, but is lacking the character to apply those gifts to the level needed to be the player he could be?if you are not sure why people are freaking out, I have to ask have you seen Jonathan Drouin play ?
lazy, defensive liability, one dimensional parasitic winger. and you want to tie our best young center to that ? for what ? do get drouin going at suzuki's expense ?
and the second part, the evidence is in. because of these attributes, Drouin lacks the skills and temperment to play in the bottom 6.
so we just keep enabling his inability to carry his own weight by giving him linemates he WONT help and in most cases does not deserve. and when ( like in the past) that doesnt work out, we blame his linemates for not sacrificing more so that Drouin can be more productive.
if you are not sure why people are freaking out, I have to ask have you seen Jonathan Drouin play ?
lazy, defensive liability, one dimensional parasitic winger. and you want to tie our best young center to that ? for what ? do get drouin going at suzuki's expense ?
and the second part, the evidence is in. because of these attributes, Drouin lacks the skills and temperment to play in the bottom 6.
so we just keep enabling his inability to carry his own weight by giving him linemates he WONT help and in most cases does not deserve. and when ( like in the past) that doesnt work out, we blame his linemates for not sacrificing more so that Drouin can be more productive.
Gifts is hard to parse, he certainly would do great in a skills competition, but when time and space are reduced he consistently makes poor decisions. Add to that his abject unwillingness to play in his own end and his lack of effort are both very real knocks on him. people see him as some sort of maligned savant, oulled down by his linemates. I see him for what he is, an anchor that pulls down any line he is onAs a Hab’s fan would you say Drouin has the God given gifts to be a valuable top six player, but is lacking the character to apply those gifts to the level needed to be the player he could be?
Sounds like my team’s (Vancouver) Jake Virtanen. Million dollar gifts, but not the internal motivation compete.Gifts is hard to parse, he certainly would do great in a skills competition, but when time and space are reduced he consistently makes poor decisions. Add to that his abject unwillingness to play in his own end and his lack of effort are both very real knocks on him. people see him as some sort of maligned savant, oulled down by his linemates. I see him for what he is, an anchor that pulls down any line he is on
I cannot think of another player of his stature in the league who still thinks that the moves he did in junior will work in the nhl. he's had YEARS of experience that they don't, but that has never stopped him.
At some point the coddling of " potential unrealized" has to stop, no ?
Drouin is pretty one dimensional but he doesn't lack the skill to be a top 6er, not at all. In fact I think he's wasted on the bottom 6. He's not a perfect player but he belongs in a offensive role.if you are not sure why people are freaking out, I have to ask have you seen Jonathan Drouin play ?
lazy, defensive liability, one dimensional parasitic winger. and you want to tie our best young center to that ? for what ? do get drouin going at suzuki's expense ?
and the second part, the evidence is in. because of these attributes, Drouin lacks the skills and temperment to play in the bottom 6.
so we just keep enabling his inability to carry his own weight by giving him linemates he WONT help and in most cases does not deserve. and when ( like in the past) that doesnt work out, we blame his linemates for not sacrificing more so that Drouin can be more productive.
An offensive role where he always, and I mean always, lives off his linemates?Drouin is pretty one dimensional but he doesn't lack the skill to be a top 6er, not at all. In fact I think he's wasted on the bottom 6. He's not a perfect player but he belongs in a offensive role.
In the cap era, both Lucic and Drouin would easily pass through waivers. Free (AKA cap space) is definitely the most valuable thing you listed.
I actually do think Drouin is a little better than Looch but Flames are already stacked at LW, so Drouin would probably end up in a bottom 6/PP 2 role. Not really a good fit.
An offensive role where he always, and I mean always, lives off his linemates?
What the he'll has he done ( and his draft position no longer counts) to deserve to play top 6 no matter how much he sucks?
The answer is nothing. He's great living off his inmates, and when he isn't he is an anchor for his linemates.
He's NEVER made his linemates better. Ever.
Absolutely. Because we are the Montreal Canadiens and have a strict francophone representation PR policy.
Jonathan Drouin sells burgers. A true 1st line player for McDonald's Canada. He's also a hoot at kids events organized by the Habs, they all know and love him for some reason.
Phil Danault? Meh. On a much, much lesser level. Bergevin has already come clean, he said getting Drouin was a pure PR move. Sergachev was the cost.
Embrace it, we have internal restrictions. Whatcha gonna do about it? Whine some more?
We pay the guy upwards of 5M a year. As if we're gonna just throw him on the 4th line... nah. RDS and TVA wouldn't be happy, you'd have dedicated segments to Drouin.
Molson and Bergevin are both extremely risk averse when it comes to PR. Last year, Molson's big innovation was new female sportswear FFS.
Unless they can trade Drouin and get a PR-equivalent like Beauvillier (ain't gonna happen), Ti-Jo is here to stay to appease the province. "Someone they can be proud of".
Blame the french. Obviously they're the problem with this team. Let's get a good anglo team with good anglo boys like they got in Toronna. Proven winners.
Yeah, that's the ticket...
That's simply untrue, he leaves a lot to be desired, but he isn't Dwight King out there.
The story with Drouin is pretty simple: the more time he spends in the offensive zone, the better; the more time he spends in the defensive zone, the worse.
Would I rather have Sergachev? Yeah, f***ing obviously.
You probably missed the presser where Bergevin outright admitted acquiring Drouin was strictly PR related. Un joueur francophone dont les fans peuvent être fiers, and all that good stuff. But hey, at first it was camouflaged as a backfill for Radulov's "departure". Completely oblivious to the fact that +Drouin, -Radulov, -Markov, -Sergachev negatively impacted both the D and the forward corps. What a great summer.
You miss Sergachev? No? Fine. A lot of us do. The company policy got us Drouin, on the basis of appeasing the fans. Especially in times with no 1C's in the pipeline, that was great work there........
I did miss that. Please show me exactly when and how he said this...
Because obviously the ONLY reason the Montréal Canadiens could EVER have a francophone as part of their organization is for PR reasons. We all know that all francophones are really bad at hockey, right?
Keep it realistic please...
Habs looking for a solid two-way LWer or LD...or a good pick
Remember, keep it respectable and realistic
Keep it realistic please...
Habs looking for a solid two-way LWer or LD...or a good pick
Remember, keep it respectable and realistic
hilarious that people questioned if Drouin carried Ehlers in junior woth Halifax. Seems more like Ehlers carried Drouin.
not sticking up for drouin but i thought they played on separate lines.hilarious that people questioned if Drouin carried Ehlers in junior woth Halifax. Seems more like Ehlers carried Drouin.
showing two videos does not negate the fact that all he does is parasitize his linemates. he doesnt, he hasn't driven a line since he has been in the NHL. and when he goes into a funk, a disproportionate portion of our fanbase blames his linemates for not feeding him more.
when he struggles ( which is often) you ALWAYS have people saying. throw him onto the first line to get him going.
here's an idea ? how about he get's himself going ?
Yeah all of the fantasy hates him the same way they ALL hated desharnais.Where in the f*** are you getting this? What a crock of shit. The fanbase largely hates Drouin and shits on him all the time.
This thread is ridiculous. No hockey fan I know from Montreal hate Drouin, there's certainly unmet expectations, but man this 'hate' wagon is cringy.