Breakers
Make Mirrored Visors Legal Again
I can’t believe how much money Klingberg cost himself.
Nightmare scenario for him. Absolutely trash season.
Nightmare scenario for him. Absolutely trash season.
Id prob be cool with that type of return... or sending Kling to a team that we can take a dump back and maybe get a late 1st.
I can’t believe how much money Klingberg cost himself.
Nightmare scenario for him. Absolutely trash season.
Not sure how Klingberg would be an option in Edmonton... Will they scratch Bouchard for Klingberg? No way he plays ahead of Ceci or Barrie on the right side.
Biggest cap dump would be Campbell but let's not go there :/What dumps does Edmonton have? That could be the deciding factor come deadline on a deal. And where Edmonton is at in the standings
Biggest cap dump would be Campbell but let's not go there :/
There is no true cap dump in Edmonton so retention would be needed. Yamamoto and Puljujarvi would be the closest to cap dumps.
It’s not just the Anaheim gamble. He also noped out on a high dollar extension from Dallas to find better in the off season. When that better never came, he fired his agent.I can’t believe how much money Klingberg cost himself.
Nightmare scenario for him. Absolutely trash season.
Something around Gibson+Klingberg for Campbell+Puljujarvi+1st as basis.. other picks/ prospects /retention to even out the valueYah Campbell isn’t gonna work. We got Dostal now who looks like he’s a good fit here. Anaheim can take Pulju as he’s RFA after this year. As it usually is? It comes down to where everyone is at in the standings at deadline. And if it’s competitive people will ask for dumps back plus retention and that’s when the lower teams get paid.
That's what I’m thinking. Also Anaheim may ship out Gibson this deadline. I think with Dostal? Anaheim doesn’t need em anymore.
Anyways, very interesting deadline. I can’t wait
Something around Gibson+Klingberg for Campbell+Puljujarvi+1st as basis.. other picks/ prospects /retention to even out the value
Something around Gibson+Klingberg for Campbell+Puljujarvi+1st as basis.. other picks/ prospects /retention to even out the value
Exactly. And Edmundson fits it. Big , rangy, D first style. Mean streak, leadership AND cost controlled multiple years
Just quit. You’re making ridiculous offers for a rebuilding team.And if you’re confused of my offer? I offer two second round picks this year, plus a cap dump you want. These picks are highly valuable this year. And I’ll give Anaheim third for youre trouble.
Anaheim gets picks back on deadline
Why in the world is a young rebuilding team trading away their recent 1st rounder?Ducks fans forget about Klingberg. You want immense value back and more PICKS. I offer 3 first round picks: 1st 23, 1st 24, Broberg (1st 19).
And it will only cost you Mintyukov.
Just quit. You’re making ridiculous offers for a rebuilding team.
Why in the world is a young rebuilding team trading away their recent 1st rounder?
There’s no reason for Anaheim to have 3 second round picks, and likely adding more this deadline. Verbeek has already drafted plenty in 22 with em. And you’re adding more? Yah they can be used in a deal somewhere if need be
Two first rounders unprotected, and Broberg is a good offer. That gives Anaheim one lottery pick with its own in this strong 23’ draft. A middle first pick this year or better, one unprotected next year. And also Broberg.
Then you add whatever Verbeek has planned at the deadline?
Edmonton wouldn’t offer that though with Anaheim. It’s a pipe dream. But that’s a very very strong offer for Mintyukov
Why in the world is a young rebuilding team trading away their recent 1st rounder?
No, I believe they were talking about Mintyukov, Ducks #10 overall pick from this past draft.Who are the Oilers getting for two 1st rounders and Broberg? Klingberg? I hope your not serious? If so, give us some past examples to support your evaluation?
so you want to trade those picks for a 31 year old defensemen signed only for one more year after this? awful logicThere’s no reason for Anaheim to have 3 second round picks, and likely adding more this deadline. Verbeek has already drafted plenty in 22 with em. And you’re adding more? Yah they can be used in a deal somewhere if need be
Oh yeah, an incredible steal! Trade away your top 10 pick from a few months ago, who's looking like an elite prospect for two later round firsts and a first from a few years ago who no longer holds that type of value.For 3 more first rounders. 1 for 3 deal. What a steal.
Sure, they can be used as assets in a trade, but your trade target doesn't make sense for a rebuilding team. If they trade away those picks, it's to get younger players, not older. They traded away a younger, better defender for picks and you think he's just going to reverse that now for a downgrade?There’s no reason for Anaheim to have 3 second round picks, and likely adding more this deadline. Verbeek has already drafted plenty in 22 with em. And you’re adding more? Yah they can be used in a deal somewhere if need be