Definitely one of the more interesting filmographies for a director. I think I automatically associate him with the poorer Batman flicks,but had a lot of decent sized hits to his name.
He seemed to be cranking out a big studio film a year in the 90s. That probably explains the quality inconsistencies,but hard to wrap your head around.
It's also amazing that Batman and Robin didn't slow his career down that much. Most directors wouldn't survive that,but he never seemed to lack for work.
Good question. Batman Forever was very profitable, so perhaps that gave him some leeway? Not sure.
Never saw Batman and Robin, but I enjoyed Batman forever when I saw it at the age of 13. Haven’t watched it since though.
Batman Forever wasn't good but it wasn't terrible. It's certainly watchable.
B&R is everything that was bad about Batman Forever cranked up to 11, with none of the good aspects. Absolutely TERRIBLE movie.
Batman Forever was okay. Liked Kilmer in the role. Just not a fan of camp though. Batman & Robin is one of the very few movies I have ever walked out of.
Me too. I can tell you the exact part, it was when Batman took out the Bat Credit Card (f***ing barf) and said "Never leave the cave without it." I was seeing red. I have never been this mad in a movie theater before. They took a sullen, mentally tortured superhero that is almost universally loved by fans of the genre and made him into a mockery.
I love cheesy movies when done right.
Commando, for instance, is absolutely brilliant. The difference is that
Commando was A) deliberately done for fun as satire, and B) wasn't based upon a dark, brooding vigilante superhero with a ton of established canon material who conceals his true identity and is tortured in his own mind.
The 1960's Batman TV show was cheesy but charming. It made no attempt to be serious and dark. B&R wants to be taken seriously but the acting, plot and script are all brutal.