stickty111
Registered User
- Jan 23, 2017
- 27,264
- 34,244
Your sarcasm isn't helping you.Thank you Lord God Jesus. You have answered our prayers.
William Nylander is a Power Forward now.
Thornton isn't replacing Nylander and for good reason.
Your sarcasm isn't helping you.Thank you Lord God Jesus. You have answered our prayers.
William Nylander is a Power Forward now.
This was my favorite Nylander goal from last season and wouldn't you know he scored it in front of the net and on the power play.
Nylander showing again how soft he was on these goals by being in front.
Thornton would be the best person to teach Marner to do that, so that's another example of how valuable a signing he was and why he was no threat to Nylander.Not really, but as others said, Thornton should just teach Marner to be more deceptive. I personally prefer a stacked unit with the big 4 and Rielly on it.
Last season even with Rielly injured, plus Marner missing 11 games and Tavares missing 7 games, the Leafs power play was T-5 with the Lightning at 23.1% and would have thought it was going to finish in the top 5 because of those circumstances.I wouldn't expect Thornton to supplant Nylander on PP1 unless the idea is to evenly split the two groups. I'm not sure that's necessary now though with Matthews, Tavares, Marner, Nylander and Rielly. It would have made more sense last season with the aforementioned five plus Barrie IMO. I think a closer comparison exists between Kerfoot and Thornton. Comparing Nylander with Thornton might be indicative of a trying season for Nylander more than anything else.
If Thornton has a season like Spezza did I won't be disappointed. There aren't any Leafs fans who are expecting him to have a repeat of his 2005-06 season when he had 125 points which won him the Art Ross and also the Hart Trophy.It pains me to say it, but I think Thornton is going to be a huge disappointment.
No chance he supplants Nylander on the PP. He’s not even the same Jumbo Joe as three years ago, let alone Hall of Fame Joe. He, just like Spezza, should be viewed as a bottom six guy who can take a turn on the 2nd PP and whose experience will be more valuable than his play.
Joe Thornton is going to be interesting to watch this season. I think that if he can prove he's still got some hockey left in him that TOR won't rely on Nylander for things like filling in on the number 2C role. Also I think that Joe's vision /playmaking ability might keep Nylander off the 1st PP.
Imagine
Tavares Thornton Matthews
Rielly Marner
on the top PP. It could work well with so many great passers and shooters.
What do you think?
I highly advise you to not go around saying he has "net presence
Yes. I've seen those stats. They are wild and misleading.
It pains me to say it, but I think Thornton is going to be a huge disappointment.
No chance he supplants Nylander on the PP. He’s not even the same Jumbo Joe as three years ago, let alone Hall of Fame Joe. He, just like Spezza, should be viewed as a bottom six guy who can take a turn on the 2nd PP and whose experience will be more valuable than his play.
Yes. What actually happened is "wild and misleading" because it goes against the opinion you want to have.
Who cares about the stat? You can see him scoring goals around the front of the net with your eyeballs too.
Only way Thornton has a chance to replace Nylander is if the Leafs could be lucky enough to trade him for Dubois as that closed tread suggests. Thornton wouldn’t play over Dubois either.
They had better not go back to splitting the PP like Babcock did. That was always his most frustrating strategy. Top players should be on the ice as much as possible.
He's not tough, he does not disrupt the goalie, he does not deflect shots like the best in the league, he shows fear of his shadow and defensemen who push him around, and he does not draw penalties from in front of the net.
I guess the easier answer would be if Nylander got injured and missed a game, because then it would be easy to use Thornton in his spot on the power play.Only way Thornton has a chance to replace Nylander is if the Leafs could be lucky enough to trade him for Dubois as that closed tread suggests. Thornton wouldn’t play over Dubois either.
They had better not go back to splitting the PP like Babcock did. That was always his most frustrating strategy. Top players should be on the ice as much as possible.
If that was true how come when Keefe took over Matthews minutes starting going up? For the first time in his career he averaged over 20:00 minutes of TOI with 20:58 TOI during the 2020-21 season.I don't disagree with your last point. I don't want to have Matthews playing 18 min. a night when he can play close to 21 min. To be fair to Babcock I think Dubas' Sports Science Dept had something to do with players playing less minutes, etc. Sports Science has since been dissolved from the organization.
It wasn't sports science, if it was then Marleau or any of Babcock's favourite bottom 6 forwards would not have received more ice-time than Matthews.I don't disagree with your last point. I don't want to have Matthews playing 18 min. a night when he can play close to 21 min. To be fair to Babcock I think Dubas' Sports Science Dept had something to do with players playing less minutes, etc. Sports Science has since been dissolved from the organization.
Game 7 against Boston in 2018 Marleau played 18:35 and Matthews played 18:06 which was un acceptable.It wasn't sports science, if it was then Marleau or any of Babcock's favourite bottom 6 forwards would not have received more ice-time than Matthews.
Nothing about sports science says that Marleau plays more minutes in a game 7 than your best player. Or Komorov and Hyman playing more than the big 3.
It wasn't sports science, if it was then Marleau or any of Babcock's favourite bottom 6 forwards would not have received more ice-time than Matthews.
Nothing about sports science says that Marleau plays more minutes in a game 7 than your best player. Or Komorov and Hyman playing more than the big 3.