BruinDust
Registered User
- Aug 2, 2005
- 25,297
- 24,196
I don't know about Monty but after a decade of service, I'm fine with handing Joe Sacco his walking papers.
All coaches have their expiration date. I'd say Cassidy is more of a player's coach than an X's and O's/system coach like Claude Julien. Maybe Cassidy was right about some of the players on this team.I don't know that I'd call Cassidy a players coach when he was fired because he lost the locker room.
That is interesting what you said about the Florida defense causing some interference, but they never got called other than Ekblad who was called twice one with 38nseconds left in the game Lindholm got called twice in the third period and I think they were questionable after watching Florida the whole game.The forward group just can't get there in time, they are far too slow as a group.
Panther's D have also been great at little bits of interference keeping forechecking forwards from getting to loose pucks early enough to matter.
Bruins forwards can also make better dump-ins. To many hard-ring arounds when it should be a soft dump cross-corner, and vice-versa.
JVR, Maroon, Brazeau, and Geekie are below-average speed-wise. Zacha, Heinen, and Frederic are average at best from a speed/skating perspective and lack those strong first few strides. That group last night might of literally been the slowest group of forwards dressed by any team in the NHL this season. I don't think it's hyperbole at all to say that.
I think he was pretty bang on about the group tbh but the players weren’t gonna listen to him either same as Monty.All coaches have their expiration date. I'd say Cassidy is more of a player's coach than an X's and O's/system coach like Claude Julien. Maybe Cassidy was right about some of the players on this team.
Only after the fruit throwing ceremony, after so many playoff D failures under his watch it’s warranted.I don't know about Monty but after a decade of service, I'm fine with handing Joe Sacco his walking papers.
That is interesting what you said about the Florida defense causing some interference, but they never got called other than Ekblad who was called twice one with 38nseconds left in the game Lindholm got called twice in the third period and I think they were questionable after watching Florida the whole game.
My dad grew up in East Cambridge. He used to see several Bruins players during the summer driving around and delivering cases of bottled soda to neighborhood grocery stores and picking up the empties for refilling. This was back in the late 1940's.When I see players just not responding I remember an older Gordie Howe joke about when he played in the playoffs. He joked guys tried so hard to win because when you lost you went back to the farm to work all summer because you had to earn money. Now millionaire kids lose and their punishment is a beach vacation on the islands and golfing.
I wonder if he was on to something.
We are sometimes guilty of embellishing this. But it seems to be Florida's MO to do it every chance possible.I didn't like the Lindholm call just inadvertent contact IMO I'm not sure how he avoids it. Panther's D-men are intentionally causing interference to Bruins forwards and getting away with most of it.
Their D is slow, the bruins aren’t moving their feet and are allowing themselves to be held or interfered with. Once tied up they make no effort to get free, they just accept that play is dead and go for a change.We are sometimes guilty of embellishing this. But it seems to be Florida's MO to do it every chance possible.
Shame on the refs for rewarding this behavior.
All coaches have their expiration date. I'd say Cassidy is more of a player's coach than an X's and O's/system coach like Claude Julien. Maybe Cassidy was right about some of the players on this team.
I understand that he changed how this team breaks out of their zone this season due to not having Bergeron anymore and for not causing odd-man rushes, but the 2D > 1F system that involves dumping it around the boards isn't working either.
The Bruins have been their best when they play with pace and make quick, short, accurate passes. The dump-ins aren't helping either. Just skate through the defense.
The center zones out, the D lose their man, and the wings alternate from hanging to losing their board battle, so its kind of a hybrid.I just don’t get the defensive system. It seems unorganized to me. I’m puzzled as to why they are so out of position all the time. Is it a zone, man or combo. Hybrid?
I used to attend Reds games in Providence during the late 1950’s. It was common for AHL players to have part-time jobs (bartenders, delivery men, etc.) during the season, as well as the summer. They were paid peanuts and couldn’t survive on hockey earnings alone.My dad grew up in East Cambridge. He used to see several Bruins players during the summer driving around and delivering cases of bottled soda to neighborhood grocery stores and picking up the empties for refilling. This was back in the late 1940's.
doesnt work as well without mr selke playing that loose zoneThe center zones out, the D lose their man, and the wings alternate from hanging to losing their board battle, so its kind of a hybrid.
I just don’t get the defensive system. It seems unorganized to me. I’m puzzled as to why they are so out of position all the time. Is it a zone, man or combo. Hybrid?
Doesn’t help that a lot of the time they’re scrambling because they turned the puck over trying to go up iceI just don’t get the defensive system. It seems unorganized to me. I’m puzzled as to why they are so out of position all the time. Is it a zone, man or combo. Hybrid?
True, even though that was my bad attempt at humor.doesnt work as well without mr selke playing that loose zone
According to Sportsnet, the Bruins play zone defense.
I think it's a symptom of Florida's shoot-from-everywhere game plan. The bounces, rebounds, loose pucks, etc. pull Bruins out of position and the longer Florida remains in the zone, the more and more out of position the Bruins are.
Systems Analyst: Breaking down the best defensive strategies for playoffs
Which defensive zone systems win Stanley Cups, and which have had less playoff success? Justin Bourne, with help from Andrew Brewer, looks at recent trends, what it means for this year's playoffs, and which teams may be most vulnerable.www.sportsnet.ca
I do find it interesting that there are only two teams listed here who play man-to-man, NYR and Carolina. The Bruins are a combined 1-5 vs. them this season and the last time the Bruins played the Rangers, their man-to-man D smothered the Bruin players. If the Bruins find a way to pull this series out of a hat, it doesn't bode well that the one of the two teams who play man-to-man will be waiting for them. Although the article does point out that some GMs believe it's very difficult to win a cup with a man-to-man defensive system as it requires a lot of energy and less positioning. Meanwhile, a well-executed zone is considered the hardest to beat.