- Dec 29, 2016
- 7,714
- 14,070
Mort - IMO, the Jets would like to have a some size on the blue line - and of course they are not looking for just size - they'd like some skill out there too.But Jets D problems are still not about size. And Stan has had a couple of pretty good games lately. I'll take good AND big evertday. But I think it is sometimes harder for the really big guys to also be skilled. Their size is a two sided coin. They have more strength, more reach and less agility and speed.
In the end, I don't care how big or small they are. I care about how effective they are. Net.
Size is a plus attribute if you can get it without sacrificing too much skill.
Sometimes you just don't have the skill that everyone wants - sometimes having some size with less skill, is a plus. Not saying it's what they want - but it might be what they have.
I agree on the plus and minus with larger Dmen - they are not as agile and can be slower. But some of that is offset by what you added - reach, wingspan, and being heavy enough to take care of the physical side (if they are so inclined).
Our core is small (mostly) and they bring some skill (but nothing elite) - so they should be able to move the puck well, bring more agility, and be quicker. But if they can't handle the physical side needed to slow things down and separate pucks, the larger less skilled / speedy guy might come in handy.
So it's a blend - I don't think we have that blend - and I'm not saying Stan is the answer to all our problems - he's not there yet and may never be.
What I am saying is he is not the cause of all our issues either - but we continue to point at him as if he is (as if most of the rest of them are not).