GDT: Jets @ Devils, 7:00 PM, MSG

Status
Not open for further replies.

forceten

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 15, 2004
5,238
6,222
Raleigh, NC
I'd do it but prefer Sharangovich in a deal
I'd do Rango. But not Z. If we lose a bona fide top 9 to gain Meier, we will STILL have a hole in that top 9.

We still have a gap even without that type of loss. Hughes, Hischier, Bratt, Palat, Meier, and ... ? in top 6. Tatar Mercer Z in third line. Rest rounding out 4th. Would be a solid lineup.
 

NjDevsRR

Anything Can Happen In Jersey
Sponsor
Apr 24, 2012
30,225
62,697
Belmar
I'd do Rango. But not Z. If we lose a bona fide top 9 to gain Meier, we will STILL have a hole in that top 9.
Sharangovich is indeed top 9 and plays a bigger role than Z (pk). So either way, its a hole. A hole that gets filled bt rango or z since Meieir with slot one of those down
 

Peter Sidorkiewicz

Devils Army
Sponsor
Oct 22, 2002
9,590
4,250
I'd do Rango. But not Z. If we lose a bona fide top 9 to gain Meier, we will STILL have a hole in that top 9.
Not really because Meier would take Sharangovich position in top 6, and Sharangovich would take Zetterlund spot on 3rd line - if Zetterlund was traded to SJ.
 

forceten

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 15, 2004
5,238
6,222
Raleigh, NC
Not really because Meier would take Sharangovich position in top 6, and Sharangovich would take Zetterlund spot on 3rd line - if Zetterlund was traded to SJ.
I guess what I'm saying is I don't see Rango as a top 6 right now, not even top 9 material right now.

Too many of our players, we say often, are the same... speed perimeter finesse. Z is an exception. Losing that to gain that (albeit betteR) moves the needle a bit but not enough IMHO.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad