ZachaFlockaFlame
Registered User
- Aug 24, 2020
- 15,704
- 20,701
Not selling Z. Losing a top 9 forward to gain one unfortunately doesn't move the needle enough for us
I'd do it but prefer Sharangovich in a deal
Not selling Z. Losing a top 9 forward to gain one unfortunately doesn't move the needle enough for us
He's real good at thoseWhat a great subtle play by Marino
I'd do Rango. But not Z. If we lose a bona fide top 9 to gain Meier, we will STILL have a hole in that top 9.I'd do it but prefer Sharangovich in a deal
TSN: Tar-tar
Sharangovich is indeed top 9 and plays a bigger role than Z (pk). So either way, its a hole. A hole that gets filled bt rango or z since Meieir with slot one of those downI'd do Rango. But not Z. If we lose a bona fide top 9 to gain Meier, we will STILL have a hole in that top 9.
Not really because Meier would take Sharangovich position in top 6, and Sharangovich would take Zetterlund spot on 3rd line - if Zetterlund was traded to SJ.I'd do Rango. But not Z. If we lose a bona fide top 9 to gain Meier, we will STILL have a hole in that top 9.
Man I was about to scream thinking he'd iced it. Good job by him.Great play by Bratt to avoid icing on that last shift
I guess what I'm saying is I don't see Rango as a top 6 right now, not even top 9 material right now.Not really because Meier would take Sharangovich position in top 6, and Sharangovich would take Zetterlund spot on 3rd line - if Zetterlund was traded to SJ.