Through 2 games…
Jets are dominating the total 5-on-5 xG: 3.74 to 1.89, for an xG% of 66.5
High-danger scoring chances are 20-7 Jets: 8-4 in game 1, and 12-3 in game 2
Blues have only 1 goal at 5-on-5 so far, by Sundqvist after Schenn kicked the puck to him in the slot
Jets have scored 5 goals at 5-on-5: Anderson-Dolan, Iafallo, Connor, Scheifele and Connor again. Only Connor’s one-timer GWG in game 1 wasn’t considered a high-danger chance given the shot location (and it should’ve been given the puck movement and goalie position). The other Jets goals were all from right in tight.
The 5-on-5 heat map for the 2 games combined shows how heavily the ice has been tilted in one direction:
View attachment 1020064
Looking at just the two 3rd periods, the total xG is 1.54 to 0.24 for the Jets (xG% 86.5) and high-danger chances are 6-0. So the Jets have been able to throttle the Blues when it matters, controlling the neutral zone and entries at both blue lines.
Including power play time (Blues have 7 power plays, Jets 6) doesn’t make it look any better for St Louis
All situations total xG is 6.96 to 2.77 for Winnipeg (xG% 71.5), and high-danger chances are 25-8
Blues have outscored the Jets 3-1 on the PP but that’s mostly down to finishing, not shot quality — Jets have had the better chances there too
Overall, the Blues have outscored their xG by more than one goal through 120 minutes, but are still down 7-4 on total goals, and 2-0 in the series. They managed to pick some corners up high on Hellebuyck on mid-range shots, and Binnington has made a bunch of saves on grade A chances, or the first two games wouldn’t have been close.
Jets just need to keep this up. They’ve been the better team.