Jets Board WJC Pool (Hero of Canton is your champion)

JetsHomer

Registered User
Nov 29, 2011
10,941
3,146
I personally think we all have enough. Any players taken this late aren't likely to get really that many points
 

Paradise*

Individual thinker
Jun 9, 2010
6,316
1
Waiverpeg
When I looked up other drafts when I started this, they all seemed to be 9 rounds. I am ok adding another round (an extra fwd, but all others would have to agree).

10 rounds finishes off your draft equally. Just an opinion, but the person picking first should finish off the draft with the last pick in it #100. As it stands right now, the person picking last in the first round is finishing off the draft with pick #90 in the final round. So you got first (Sweech) picking 9 players in the first 81 picks. Last place (mzappa) picking 9 players in the first 90 picks. The math doesn't really add up. Making it 10 rounds allows for 10 picks in the total 100 overall for everyone. Of course it's your guys draft and you can do whatever you wish.
 

Lux Aurumque*

Guest
With my final pick, I'm taking Latvia's Roberts Lipsbergs. Top rookie scorer in the Dub.

I think 9 is plenty. I was running out of ideas towards round 7.
 

mzappa

Jets fans in space
Jun 27, 2011
4,746
263
Yes, I am getting royally screwed!!! this thing is fixed!:shakehead

PS - don't care either way.

10 rounds finishes off your draft equally. Just an opinion, but the person picking first should finish off the draft with the last pick in it #100. As it stands right now, the person picking last in the first round is finishing off the draft with pick #90 in the final round. So you got first (Sweech) picking 9 players in the first 81 picks. Last place (mzappa) picking 9 players in the first 90 picks. The math doesn't really add up. Making it 10 rounds allows for 10 picks in the total 100 overall for everyone. Of course it's your guys draft and you can do whatever you wish.
 

Holden Caulfield

He's guilty
Feb 15, 2006
23,334
6,151
Winnipeg
10 rounds finishes off your draft equally. Just an opinion, but the person picking first should finish off the draft with the last pick in it #100. As it stands right now, the person picking last in the first round is finishing off the draft with pick #90 in the final round. So you got first (Sweech) picking 9 players in the first 81 picks. Last place (mzappa) picking 9 players in the first 90 picks. The math doesn't really add up. Making it 10 rounds allows for 10 picks in the total 100 overall for everyone. Of course it's your guys draft and you can do whatever you wish.

No, I get that. But at this point in a draft of this type at this point, it really doesn't matter, not much depth in the draft, it's hit or miss at this point.

Seems like there's not much interest in another round, we'll keep it as is.

As for my pick, I'll take...

LW Christoph Bertschy
 

Holden Caulfield

He's guilty
Feb 15, 2006
23,334
6,151
Winnipeg
I think thats just Hudon?

I think that's Hudon.

Regardless we are going to have a "supplemental draft" to replace any player that is not on the team's final roster. All the final rosters should be out tmw, so I will review the rosters tmw and PM everybody affected. I am 99% sure that one player drafted is not on a final roster, and one of the 7 US defensemen drafted so far likely will no be on the final roster as well. There could be others.
 

Paradise*

Individual thinker
Jun 9, 2010
6,316
1
Waiverpeg
No, I get that. But at this point in a draft of this type at this point, it really doesn't matter, not much depth in the draft, it's hit or miss at this point.

Seems like there's not much interest in another round, we'll keep it as is.

As for my pick, I'll take...

LW Christoph Bertschy

I bet to differ. I can name a handful of forwards that will most likely put up quality points. That would most likely make up the difference in points between picking at the top versus the bottom IMO. The top had it easy at the beginning, making it more difficult at the end makes sense. I can see why some wouldn't want to extend the draft, finding sleepers is more difficult than picking the top players:laugh:
 

Paradise*

Individual thinker
Jun 9, 2010
6,316
1
Waiverpeg
Iim neither for nor against another round. Whichever is good for me.

I'm not taking part in this draft, but I'm interested from a bystanders eye. I'm only commenting because I like balance and fairness in competitions and can't say truthfully that there isn't a slight edge (no matter how small some may think it's still there) right now. I hope my honesty is appreciated :)
 

TroubaFan1

Registered User
Jul 21, 2011
895
0
Winnipeg
I'm not taking part in this draft, but I'm interested from a bystanders eye. I'm only commenting because I like balance and fairness in competitions and can't say truthfully that there isn't a slight edge (no matter how small some may think it's still there) right now. I hope my honesty is appreciated :)

I really appreciate your honesty. Keep up the good work. :handclap:
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad