Post-Game Talk: Jets 6 - Rangers 3

KingBogo

Admitted Homer
Nov 29, 2011
32,710
43,431
Winnipeg
No. We were supposed to break them up because they played poorly together. Charts and graphs were not the reason. They simply proved the point. Current charts and graphs show that things have changed. All it took was a moderate improvement in Scheif's defensive play and a big one in Connor's.

We no longer need to break them up, or trade Appleton, or fire Stanley into the Sun. We are no longer desperate for a 2C or a 1/2RHD.
I think you are touching on how Arniel viewed 55/81 together over some fans. IMO at least Arniel was forward looking and saw what could be ideal combinations if the players played the way and in the system he wanted, while fans who just looked at charts were saying this combination didn't do as well in the past and didn't look at what could be their potential. We are seeing 2 things happening, Scheifele is maintaining a more consistent defensive positioning where he is supporting the puck better, and Connor his tracking back better. The net result is they are making easier and more consistent zone exits, so they play less time in the defensive end and more time in the offensive end where the excel. Add in a big winger with good puck skills like Vilardi who can help control possession in the offensive zone. Personally I'm glad we have a coach that looks at what is possible if he can get players playing the way he wants.
 

Buffdog

Registered User
Feb 13, 2019
8,349
20,270
I think you are touching on how Arniel viewed 55/81 together over some fans. IMO at least Arniel was forward looking and saw what could be ideal combinations if the players played the way and in the system he wanted, while fans who just looked at charts were saying this combination didn't do as well in the past and didn't look at what could be their potential. We are seeing 2 things happening, Scheifele is maintaining a more consistent defensive positioning where he is supporting the puck better, and Connor his tracking back better. The net result is they are making easier and more consistent zone exits, so they play less time in the defensive end and more time in the offensive end where the excel. Add in a big winger with good puck skills like Vilardi who can help control possession in the offensive zone. Personally I'm glad we have a coach that looks at what is possible if he can get players playing the way he wants.
Well said. I think that the difference between a coach and some fans who are super into analytics is that a coach can look at the same metrics as a fan does and say "why are Schief and Connor getting outchanced so badly" and then actually go watch the game tape and see what needs to be addressed.

As @Whileee pointed out, some tweaks in their zone exits and D zone positioning have gone a
long way.. Whereas uninformed fans who only look at stats had nothing but "they've always sucked together, split them up"

I think there's still some improvements to be made in their play with regards to shift length (which can be both a cause AND a result of them getting hemmed in too long) which would lead to even fewer chances against
 
Last edited:

voyageur

Hockey fanatic
Jul 10, 2011
10,426
9,744
I think you are touching on how Arniel viewed 55/81 together over some fans. IMO at least Arniel was forward looking and saw what could be ideal combinations if the players played the way and in the system he wanted, while fans who just looked at charts were saying this combination didn't do as well in the past and didn't look at what could be their potential. We are seeing 2 things happening, Scheifele is maintaining a more consistent defensive positioning where he is supporting the puck better, and Connor his tracking back better. The net result is they are making easier and more consistent zone exits, so they play less time in the defensive end and more time in the offensive end where the excel. Add in a big winger with good puck skills like Vilardi who can help control possession in the offensive zone. Personally I'm glad we have a coach that looks at what is possible if he can get players playing the way he wants.
I don't think you can necessarily analyze forward success in a vacuum. I think Scheifele is still working on the good habits that Bowness tried to bring in to his game. Connor seems a lot more competitive this year defensively.

There's also limited data on Vilardi.

Anything KC, Scheifele related that tracks back through time has Wheeler all over it, and Laine in 2019-20 until the trade deadline. I would think that the line in the sand for Wheeler being a negative impact came somewhere around 2022, after his injury. Everything before that was relatively close, and he still held some PP value. Shift lengths in the old coaching system of Maurice might have been an issue, but I listened to the Bowness interview someone posted here, and he talked about how you have to give stars more leeway than bottom players, just because you need them to succeed. By the time Bowness got to coach this team he wasn't worried about being fired, it was his last job, and he did the job he was sought to do, to bring some defensive structure to the forward group and team in general. I think it has slid at times, but the guys who didn't buy in aren't here now.

The other Bowness change that Arniel is reaping is more offense from the defense.

After the Buff Trouba Myers years, the defense played a flat, keep the puck in front of them game, based on their talent level, and that of the team.

Improving the skating of the defense this year, makes outlets easier, you can pressure at different points up ice, both offensively and defensively if you play in unison. And for the team to be running on all cylinders, it's 5 players reading off each other, and a goalie who wants to be the best.

There's probably also an element of familiarity that lends to the success of the players that are having another go after a successful regular season last year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Buffdog and Krauser

LowLefty

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Dec 29, 2016
7,708
14,050
I don't think you can necessarily analyze forward success in a vacuum. I think Scheifele is still working on the good habits that Bowness tried to bring in to his game. Connor seems a lot more competitive this year defensively.
IMO, the biggest change to the top line is way KC is now playing - which is a very defensively sound game.
TBH, I didn't see it coming - I expected improvement because there was a ton of room for that - but did not expect him to deliver at this level, this quickly.

As for 55, there more to give - he's better positionally when defending but there is another gear that we are not seeing.
And I'm fine with that for now - but hope to see him step up his pursuit and physical game (in our end) once PO's come around.
There's still a bit of the "fly by" in his game but less of it - maybe he needs more time - PO's would be a good time.
 

MardyBum

Registered User
Jul 4, 2012
16,784
17,604
Winnipeg, Manitoba
No. We were supposed to break them up because they played poorly together. Charts and graphs were not the reason. They simply proved the point. Current charts and graphs show that things have changed. All it took was a moderate improvement in Scheif's defensive play and a big one in Connor's.

We no longer need to break them up, or trade Appleton, or fire Stanley into the Sun. We are no longer desperate for a 2C or a 1/2RHD.

Tbf they were ass for a chunk (just like the "2nd" line) then amazing for a chunk. The PP success and Lowry line scoring covered it.

If they're amazing, or even good, keep them together. Ehlers is my favourite Jet. I'm fine with him on the "2nd line" as long as the 1st line is good. Just good. They've been incredible lately which could lead to some amazing things, but being *at best* a 50/50 split in goals with your 20min a night #1 C is a recipe for losing.

I give KC the most credit of the 3 so far. It's not always pretty but his ass has been hustling to try and defend more this year, everywhere.
 

KingBogo

Admitted Homer
Nov 29, 2011
32,710
43,431
Winnipeg
Chevy should talk to rob blake about doughty- probly could get him for demelo. Blake would probably retain salary and throw in a first
I think you would have to kidnap Doughty at gun point and have some sort of leverage on him for him to give up his LA life style and beach house in Malibu to move to Winnipeg, especially after he has won his cups.
 

Buffdog

Registered User
Feb 13, 2019
8,349
20,270
Tbf they were ass for a chunk (just like the "2nd" line) then amazing for a chunk. The PP success and Lowry line scoring covered it.

If they're amazing, or even good, keep them together. Ehlers is my favourite Jet. I'm fine with him on the "2nd line" as long as the 1st line is good. Just good. They've been incredible lately which could lead to some amazing things, but being *at best* a 50/50 split in goals with your 20min a night #1 C is a recipe for losing.

I give KC the most credit of the 3 so far. It's not always pretty but his ass has been hustling to try and defend more this year, everywhere.
I think that we're finally starting to see what the org envisioned by having a line that's driven by Ehlers matched up vs softer competition

They're 10GF and 4GA at 5v5, and that includes their bumpy 3 game start to the season, which means they've really heated up

Also should be noted that they're equal with the Lowry line in 5v5 minutes through the first 16 games (both lines are averaging about 10 minutes at 5v5 per game vs 13 minutes per game for CSV)
 

Jet

Chibby!
Jul 20, 2004
34,212
35,700
Florida
No. We were supposed to break them up because they played poorly together. Charts and graphs were not the reason. They simply proved the point. Current charts and graphs show that things have changed. All it took was a moderate improvement in Scheif's defensive play and a big one in Connor's.

We no longer need to break them up, or trade Appleton, or fire Stanley into the Sun. We are no longer desperate for a 2C or a 1/2RHD.
Blah blah blah
 

PaulPooley

Registered User
Nov 18, 2018
2,793
3,841
I think you are touching on how Arniel viewed 55/81 together over some fans. IMO at least Arniel was forward looking and saw what could be ideal combinations if the players played the way and in the system he wanted, while fans who just looked at charts were saying this combination didn't do as well in the past and didn't look at what could be their potential. We are seeing 2 things happening, Scheifele is maintaining a more consistent defensive positioning where he is supporting the puck better, and Connor his tracking back better. The net result is they are making easier and more consistent zone exits, so they play less time in the defensive end and more time in the offensive end where the excel. Add in a big winger with good puck skills like Vilardi who can help control possession in the offensive zone. Personally I'm glad we have a coach that looks at what is possible if he can get players playing the way he wants.
Connor wants the puck this year. Prior to this season i questioned that drive. Now he gets to loose pucks and is using his speed.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad