Player Discussion Jeremy Swayman: VII - As featured in Episode 3 of Amazon's "FACEOFF: Inside the NHL

How does this saga end?

  • Bridge deal

    Votes: 58 20.6%
  • Long term deal

    Votes: 77 27.4%
  • Trade

    Votes: 146 52.0%

  • Total voters
    281

smithformeragent

Moderator
Sep 22, 2005
33,836
27,074
Milford, NH
One could make the argument that we're beating a dead horse here.

So be it. Discuss, if you so choose. We'll keep all the Swayman talk contained to this thread.

If you have nothing meaningful to contribute to the conversation, move along.

We will not have this devolve into thread hijacking and flaming of other posters.

@Gee Wally

We have numerous deletions and more in here. We know tension and emotions are high.
But you folks must simply stop taking personal shots at each. Stay to topic.

If not we will be left with no choice other than adding thread bans.
 
Last edited:

Bruins4Lifer

Registered User
Jun 28, 2006
8,928
999
Regina, SK
It doesn’t though. Dom did the work a few days ago. The proration of his deal goes up faster than the cap space banked (and you do need to account for a goalie making $775k replacing Swayman as well)
I explained my cap space calculation above. They have both Patera and Bussi on the roster at 775k/each right now. If they dump either one of them to Providence, they would have $7,861,667 + $775,000 = $8,636,667 in cap space to start the season, according to Puckpedia.

If you want to follow's Dom's cap hit sheet he provided earlier, and use Oct 30 as the date, it has Swayman at just over $9M cap hit on Oct 30 (it's assuming he's signing a 8yr $8M salary in each year deal. No signing bonuses). Bruins would have $8,636,667 x (192/166) = $9,989,398 in accrued cap space on that date. It all works out, as long as they maintain/average that amount of cap space.
 

DominicT

Registered User
Sep 6, 2009
20,460
37,257
Stratford Ontario
dom.hockey
Assume the season starts Oct 7 with 192 days remaining.
On Dec 1st, 55 days have passed (137 days remaining).
If the Bruins keep an average daily cap space of exactly $8,000,000 over those 55 days, they would have an accrued cap space amount of $8,000,000 x (192/137) = $11,211,679 on Dec 1st.

Swayman's cap hit on Dec 1 if he signs at 8 X 8 is $10,810,219 for year one and $7,713,542 for remaining years.

You are already behind the eight ball because what you don't find on puckpedia or capwages is that as of right now, the Bruins can't send Alec Regula through waivers and to the AHL because he is injured. That could change by 2 pm tomorrow,

Are they going to waive Bussi? Or are they going to carry three goalies to start? Were they planning on sending Poitras down? Can't, he is also injured.

Regula already puts them under $8 million and that is without a 13th forward.
 

Bruins4Lifer

Registered User
Jun 28, 2006
8,928
999
Regina, SK
Swayman's cap hit on Dec 1 if he signs at 8 X 8 is $10,810,219 for year one and $7,713,542 for remaining years.

You are already behind the eight ball because what you don't find on puckpedia or capwages is that as of right now, the Bruins can't send Alec Regula through waivers and to the AHL because he is injured. That could change by 2 pm tomorrow,

Are they going to waive Bussi? Or are they going to carry three goalies to start? Were they planning on sending Poitras down? Can't, he is also injured.

Regula already puts them under $8 million and that is without a 13th forward.
Yep, my $8M cap space figure was only a simple assumption to keep my example straight forward to follow. Lots of things can change or mess that up for the Bruins, as you're mentioning.

If they're under $8M right now and can't get over by Monday, then they can't even sign Swayman to the 8 x $8M even if he wanted to. That'd be funny if that's what's holding it up right now.
 
Last edited:

Donnie Shulzhoffer

Rocket Surgery
Sep 9, 2008
16,314
12,280
Foxboro, MA
I just explained why I think those terms have very different connotations, so no need to addresses that again.

But am I crazy or has he only brought up arbitration maybe four times total? Genuinely asking, because I can remember three for sure but have a vague memory of a fourth, yet I am very cognizant I might have missed some or simple don't remember others.

Four is still kind of a lot considering this is rarely a thing players talk about. (Though that may be because most teams do everything they can to avoid taking good players to arbitration so there are fewer opportunities to upset them.) I just don't care because it clearly motivated him to play well on the ice, which I do care about.

I don't fault anyone for being annoyed by it, I honestly don't. But there are a lot of people in here who are way way way more than "annoyed." There's real vitriol, some of which I find unhinged.
Disagreeing is vitriol? Unhinged?

Overreaction 101
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Pia8988

SwayHeyKid

Registered User
Mar 14, 2022
1,975
2,219
Disagreeing is vitriol? Unhinged?

Overreaction 101
Calling the guy names for not signing a deal they feel is fair is disagreeing? That is vitriol. And anyone calling a person a baby or whatnot on a message board or not signing a contract he doesnt feel worth his value is unhinged

Clueless 101

I’m pretty sure the simple disagreement isn’t what Mike is referring to.
He obviously isn't but the handful of intentionally obtuse posters are gonna obtuse.
 

Absurdity

light switch connoisseur
Jul 6, 2012
11,258
7,822
I'm starting to wonder if this cap space isn't better spent on a forward. We can take a high priced player back in trade, either directly or in there way deal. Is there a high priced, high impact forward under 30 that might be available?
No one is going to trade a high impact forward at the start of the season. Teams worked all offseason to set their roster, and they aren't going to blow it up just because Swayman could potentially be available.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SwayHeyKid

SwayHeyKid

Registered User
Mar 14, 2022
1,975
2,219
No one is going to trade a high impact forward at the start of the season. Teams worked all offseason to set their roster, and they aren't going to blow it up just because Swayman could potentially be available.
100%. Bruins aren't going to punt their season and deal him for picks/prospects which is prob what they get at this point so close to the season.
 

Guelph Bruin

Registered User
Sponsor
Mar 2, 2015
947
2,222
100%. Bruins aren't going to punt their season and deal him for picks/prospects which is prob what they get at this point so close to the season.
you can probably pluck some unwanted contracts like Huberdeau or Kadri from rebuilding teams with some retention but yeah it's mostly slim pickings
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad