Player Discussion Jeremy Swayman: VII - As featured in Episode 3 of Amazon's "FACEOFF: Inside the NHL

How does this saga end?

  • Bridge deal

    Votes: 53 20.5%
  • Long term deal

    Votes: 71 27.4%
  • Trade

    Votes: 135 52.1%

  • Total voters
    259

smithformeragent

Moderator
Sep 22, 2005
33,835
27,066
Milford, NH
One could make the argument that we're beating a dead horse here.

So be it. Discuss, if you so choose. We'll keep all the Swayman talk contained to this thread.

If you have nothing meaningful to contribute to the conversation, move along.

We will not have this devolve into thread hijacking and flaming of other posters.

@Gee Wally

We have numerous deletions and more in here. We know tension and emotions are high.
But you folks must simply stop taking personal shots at each. Stay to topic.

If not we will be left with no choice other than adding thread bans.
 
Last edited:

Greek_physique

Caron - Legit SNIPER
Jul 9, 2004
23,113
3,305
Toronto, Ont
1727892516804.gif
 

SonnyBoy

Registered User
Jan 25, 2022
159
118
At the end of the day, Swayman is a top 5 goalie who projects to improve further. The top 5 centers in the game all make over 8 million; why shouldn't Swayman? Is Swayman's position less important? Jeremy is right to want to reset the goalie market.

Centers are paid more and top 5 centers have played more great season's than Swayman.

I am glad that Swayman has the self-respect to demand a salary that reflects his value, especially after management mistreated him during arbitration.

Memo to Bruins management: it is unacceptable to lie during negotiations. That goes for both last year and this year.

What next? Trent 7 million, Lohrei 6 million and Beecher 5 million. What if they too are butthurt and overvaluing they contract?
 

Bodit9

Registered User
Sponsor
Oct 22, 2016
2,858
5,245
Upstate NY
I am glad that Swayman has the self-respect to demand a salary that reflects his value, especially after management mistreated him during arbitration.

Memo to Bruins management: it is unacceptable to lie during negotiations. That goes for both last year and this year.
Swayman needs to grow up and stop acting like a whiny baby.
 

Fingertools

Registered User
May 29, 2019
25
38
Top 10? Yes. Top 5? Debatable. And yes, his position is less important. Goalies have much more volatile performance than position players and elite goaltending is not necessary for team success. This has been pointed out many times which is why they are paid less.
If this is true, why are there so many people claiming Swayman has "only" won 1 playoff round and hasn't the required hardware to consider himself one of the best? If a goalie position is less important, why does how many playoff series wins matter?
 

danpantz

Registered User
Mar 31, 2013
8,078
11,551
I am glad that Swayman has the self-respect to demand a salary that reflects his value, especially after management mistreated him during arbitration.

Memo to Bruins management: it is unacceptable to lie during negotiations. That goes for both last year and this year.

They lied during the arbitration that was decided on by a neutral party and then gave Sway a year of it back?
 

SPLBRUIN

Registered User
Mar 21, 2010
12,079
12,057
If Swayman sits out/refuses to sign the Bruins will be sitting with a ton of cap space, surely enough to address the issue of a top 6 winger. I still want Swayman to sign with the Bruins, but Vegas, Pittsburgh and Chicago have shown that you can still win cups without having a bonafide #1. Fortunately the Bruins have a really strong D to support Korps.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff and Bodit9

PlayMakers

Registered User
Aug 9, 2004
25,517
26,541
Medfield, MA
“Yeah, after dealing with what I did this summer with arbitration, hearing things that a player should never hear, it feels pretty special to be in this situation,” Swayman said after Boston’s overtime win over the Blues on Saturday night.

I hope management has learned their lesson.
Poor Jeremy. They pointed out his shortcomings and things he needs to get better at to earn bigger money. How awful for him.

Give me a break.
 
Last edited:

PlayMakers

Registered User
Aug 9, 2004
25,517
26,541
Medfield, MA
Sweeney should’ve brought him back to arbitration this year.

I guarantee he wouldn’t sniff even 6.4 mil in that.
I actually think they were trying to do Swayman a solid by not going to arbitration. Clearly, he doesn't have the makeup to handle the process. He's still crying about the last time they went to arbitration can you imagine how "damaged" he would be if they did it twice?
 

Patdud

Registered User
Sponsor
Mar 23, 2022
1,983
2,974
New Hampshire
I think we traded the wrong goalie, Gross will have him sit out till 12/1 and whats the point of him returning? Trade him for a young center or winger and a vet goalie. People mentioned Anaheim, how much does Gibson make again?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff

neelynugs

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
35,593
10,483
I actually think they were trying to do Swayman a solid by not going to arbitration. Clearly, he doesn't have the makeup to handle the process. He's still crying about the last time they went to arbitration can you imagine how "damaged" he would be if they did it twice?
i'm already missing linus the f***ing viking

if the bruins drew a line in the sand and said 8 years/$6M AAV, i could get behind the angst
from #1. but 8x8 is fair IMO.
 

LSCII

Cup driven
Mar 1, 2002
50,826
22,513
Central MA
This makes no sense whatsoever. They wanted to trade Swayman all along so they trade the in house replacement (Ullmark) and downgrade to Korpi only to then try to trade Swayman in a separate trade? Why on earth would a team like the Sens not just trade for Sway then instead of Ullmark? And why wouldn't they have just kept Ullmark and gotten a better return for Sway?

Also what was the character assassination here, I didn't listen to the presser...surely you aren't calling the $64 million reason comment an assassination of character right?
I didn't say all along. They would have happily kept him had he taken their low ball offer. When it became clear he was treating it as business, they clearly hit a point where they realized he was looking for fair market value, so plan b and Korpi kicked in.

I don't see him coming back after this.

If I see “management ball-washers” posted in here one more time I’m going to lose my mind.
I'd recommend avoiding all mirrors then...:naughty:






Sorry, it was too hard to pass up....LOL
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Grimey and Pia8988

MarchysNoseKnows

Big Hat No Cattle
Feb 14, 2018
9,610
19,248
I didn't say all along. They would have happily kept him had he taken their low ball offer. When it became clear he was treating it as business, they clearly hit a point where they realized he was looking for fair market value, so plan b and Korpi kicked in.

I don't see him coming back after this.
How are you determining “fair market value” without using comps?
 

PlayMakers

Registered User
Aug 9, 2004
25,517
26,541
Medfield, MA
At the end of the day, Swayman is a top 5 goalie who projects to improve further. The top 5 centers in the game all make over 8 million; why shouldn't Swayman? Is Swayman's position less important? Jeremy is right to want to reset the goalie market.
Agents and managers both make their arguments based on comparable players at comparable positions. It's how it's always been done, even in arbitration hearings, and that format was agreed to by the NHL and NHLPA.

Maybe a McDavid could say I don't care what's happened for 100 years, I want X and I have the clout to change the system. But who the f*** is Jeremy Swayman to think he's that guy? Talk about ego.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad