Player Discussion Jeremy Swayman: VII - agreed to 8 x 8.25 aav

How does this saga end?

  • Bridge deal

    Votes: 58 19.7%
  • Long term deal

    Votes: 89 30.3%
  • Trade

    Votes: 147 50.0%

  • Total voters
    294
Status
Not open for further replies.

smithformeragent

Moderator
Sep 22, 2005
34,171
27,809
Milford, NH
One could make the argument that we're beating a dead horse here.

So be it. Discuss, if you so choose. We'll keep all the Swayman talk contained to this thread.

If you have nothing meaningful to contribute to the conversation, move along.

We will not have this devolve into thread hijacking and flaming of other posters.

@Gee Wally

We have numerous deletions and more in here. We know tension and emotions are high.
But you folks must simply stop taking personal shots at each. Stay to topic.

If not we will be left with no choice other than adding thread bans.
 
Last edited:

KillerMillerTime

Registered User
Jun 30, 2019
8,073
6,698
Sits for the year is actually impossible. Nobody should vote for it.

If Sway were to actually do that, he is the dumbest athlete in the NHL. And he'd deserve every bit of misery coming.

You fire your agent on the eve of Dec 1, and you sign.
How many clients have fired Gross?
 

4ORRBRUIN

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 27, 2005
23,615
18,481
boston
Going from the best goaltending duo in the league to the worst. Hell, with so many suggesting we simply sit Swayman for the year, we’re not even entertaining the assets acquired in a trade - however limited those may be.

Principle over team success. Need to make a point over winning games. Maybe folks are too young to remember the Steve Shields days and the purgatory that ensued with crossed fingers manning our nets? Dunno. I’m not in that camp.
Neither Am I but the cap and players have limitations. Does that cap hit make the Bruins a cup contending for the next 8 years if that's his ask?

Answer is nobody knows but Im willing to bet the real answer will be no. Never bet on a goalie being nothing better than good to average over an Eight year period.
 

Sevendust

Registered User
Jan 11, 2010
1,822
2,378
Munich, Germany
Going from the best goaltending duo in the league to the worst. Hell, with so many suggesting we simply sit Swayman for the year, we’re not even entertaining the assets acquired in a trade - however limited those may be.

Principle over team success. Need to make a point over winning games. Maybe folks are too young to remember the Steve Shields days and the purgatory that ensued with crossed fingers manning our nets? Dunno. I’m not in that camp.

I really don't get it. It's like everybody are losing their minds 😂 Swayman is a better goalie than any goalie the Bruins have a chance to get. Pay the man, kick his ass for the holdup and then focus to the future with goal to win the Cup. Losing Swayman will worsen the chance to win one.
 

LSCII

Cup driven
Mar 1, 2002
50,888
22,657
Central MA
How do you know it is actually false, media say all kinds of things as that is their job.
Right now as far as I am concerned let him sit.
Like I pointed out earlier a lot of folks here were giving the Bruins front office a lot of credit for taking the higher road and not negotiating thru the media. Those same people changed course mid argument when the president of the team started negotiating thru the media. So which is it? Is Gross a scumbag for using the media? If so, that makes Cam a scumbag too, no?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dr Quincy

bruins cup

Registered User
Jun 29, 2024
151
149
They have 8.5 left and the moment they play game 1 even if he signs for 8 mil cap hit is less land less with every game missed $750 k is the league min Johnson is in their plans at that route
 

NDiesel

Registered User
Mar 22, 2008
10,085
11,266
NWO
Like I pointed out earlier a lot of folks here were giving the Bruins front office a lot of credit for taking the higher road and not negotiating thru the media. Those same people changed course mid argument when the president of the team started negotiating thru the media. So which is it? Is Gross a scumbag for using the media? If so, that makes Cam a scumbag too, no?
No space for nice guys in negotiations
 

BMC

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 26, 2003
71,685
64,257
The Quiet Corner
Like I said, I think they loved him at a certain value, liked him at a little more than that, and are fine moving on from him once he crosses a threshold they don't want to pay. Nothing more, nothing less. Just business. And on the flip side. I think Sway is viewing it the same.


Then Donnie Harvard is even dumber than I thought, letting his personal feelings get in the way of what's best for the team.

Personal feelings? Or just knowing that negotiating with Gross is a difficult process and he (Sweeney) needed a Plan B in case negotiations went to hell? Sweeney has to ice a complete team whether Swayman is around or not. He'd be guilty of negligence if he didn't have an NHL level goalie ready to step in.
 

Mr. Make-Believe

The happy genius of my household
Neither Am I but the cap and players have limitations. Does that cap hit make the Bruins a cup contending for the next 8 years if that's his ask?

Answer is nobody knows but Im willing to bet the real answer will be no. Never bet on a goalie being nothing better than good to average over an Eight year period.
That cap hit isn’t the only consideration in whether or not the Bruins are Cup contenders.

Going with Korpisalo and Bussi (or Patera now I guess) however? That ensures you won’t be sniffing a Cup.
 

PB37

Mr Selke
Oct 1, 2002
26,320
22,148
Maine
they came in at 2mil to purposely lower the number he would get. Lower than Daniel Vladar lol.

But go ahead and say it's business.....sure is...just like Swayman is doing now.

Sure, and now Swayman is pricing himself out of starting the season on time and potentially the season by being unreasonable. He'll learn pretty quickly what it's like when he wants to do business for himself to the point where nobody wants to do business with him.
 

SwayHeyKid

Registered User
Mar 14, 2022
1,976
2,257
That cap hit isn’t the only consideration in whether or not the Bruins are Cup contenders.

Going with Korpisalo and Bussi (or Patera now I guess) however? That ensures you won’t be sniffing a Cup.
At least the excuse will be Swayman,. Generally it's phantom injuries or whatever but now there is a true villian!
 

BiteThisBurrows

Registered User
Feb 11, 2022
1,289
2,750
Liar liar pants on fire.........and if that's the way he wants his agent to deal with this it's saying to me that being a Bruin isn't as important to him as he claimed it was. In fact, he might have been bitter from arbitration and he lied from the outset to the Bruins (which is why they believed him and traded Ullmark). So ultimately it's all bs and none of it matters.

Swayman had a simple choice here. With Neely putting the 64 million number out there Swayman could easily have just said, 64 million? Get me a pen, I'm there tomorrow. But he chose to let his agent make this ugly so I don't think he ever really cared about being a Bruin or not. 64 million is a generous overpay and if he doesn't want it, end this now. Goodbye Jeremy, enjoy being a Duck (or whatever)

Trade him for a top 6 winger.
 

NDiesel

Registered User
Mar 22, 2008
10,085
11,266
NWO
Sure you can say that as a regular person not making that kind of dough, but if you had the chance to make $8.5 and someone offered you that, you’d be insulted
Nah that's literally just how negotiations go man.

I fully expect a boss to start lower than im worth and I would 100% start higher than I think I'm worth too. I wouldn't expect to be called greedy, just like I wouldn't consider it a slap in the face either. That's business right
 

lopey

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jan 27, 2009
15,627
15,456
Frozen Tundra Northern Ontario
I didn't say all along. They would have happily kept him had he taken their low ball offer. When it became clear he was treating it as business, they clearly hit a point where they realized he was looking for fair market value, so plan b and Korpi kicked in.

I don't see him coming back after this.


I'd recommend avoiding all mirrors then...:naughty:






Sorry, it was too hard to pass up....LOL
Ok bye sway nice knowing you
 

NDiesel

Registered User
Mar 22, 2008
10,085
11,266
NWO
How so? The past three years he has won the Presidents Trophy (around here that means a heck of alot), goaltended his team to a finals and did it again but won this time.
Because his stats have been below average in 3 of his 5 seasons there. Not what you want to get from 10 mil. Big reason teams don't spend big on goalies is because season to season it's tough to stay on top, Bob is a prime example.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LiseL and Gordoff

Fingertools

Registered User
May 29, 2019
31
44
That's one way to look at it. The other angle is considering 8 years of security -- meaning that if you get injured or start to tail off you still get paid.

People are fixated on the idea that nothing every goes wrong and prices and values always go up -- every single year.

You guarantee me that Swayman can handled 55+ games plus deep playoff runs and guarantee me that his talent/ability/or injury status will not fall off over the next 8 years and I'll pay you $9M per.

But of course you cannot guarantee me one single thing on that list: workload capability/ talent stays or even improves/results and ability remain in top 5 goalie plus territory/no impactful injuries.

That's not your fault -- but you still can't guarantee it. And yet I'm supposed to guarantee it for you by paying you like nothing can go wrong over an 8 year period and you "might" be as good in a full starter role as you tell me???????????????
Can you guarantee that if he eclipses Shersterkin's performance who signed for much higher than $9M that you'll then readjust his salary in a few years? Or it's ok if he does better but not worse? It's a risk both ways and that's the conundrum.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad

Ad