GOALOFSSON
Game Changer
I know its hf boards, but the amount of people who think Skinner's contract is worse than Vlasic's or Seabrook's is hilarious.
I know its hf boards, but the amount of people who think Skinner's contract is worse than Vlasic's or Seabrook's is hilarious.
Seabrook and Vlasic's both go down to a NTC at the end. Skinner is a NMC the whole way.
And Skinners is for 30% more than either d-mans.
We will see how Skinner plays with a real center this year.
Seabrook is done, but, there's a good chance he'll spend the last 2-3 years of the contract on LTIR.
Vlasic I think still has some tread on the tire. Not sure he'll live up to the contract, but I think he'll be closer to Okposo (overpaid but useful) while Skinner has been just awful on his contract so far. Obviously we hope that changes, but long term, the Skinner contract is a rope around our neck that isn't going away.
I'd probably trade Skinner straight up for Vlasic if given the opportunity. We'd save 2M in space and Vlasic would be overpaid, but not to the same extent that Skinner is. And it'd fill an immediate need (2 LHD)
Vlasic is signed until he is 39, he should be worse than Okposo for his last three years if not more.
1 less year than 28yo Skinner, and only 2M cheaper, I don't see it.
I'd hate a Skinner/Vlasic trade even if Hall was signed for more than a year.
Seabrook and Vlasic's both go down to a NTC at the end. Skinner is a NMC the whole way.
And Skinners is for 30% more than either d-mans.
We will see how Skinner plays with a real center this year.
Seabrook is done, but, there's a good chance he'll spend the last 2-3 years of the contract on LTIR.
Vlasic I think still has some tread on the tire. Not sure he'll live up to the contract, but I think he'll be closer to Okposo (overpaid but useful) while Skinner has been just awful on his contract so far. Obviously we hope that changes, but long term, the Skinner contract is a rope around our neck that isn't going away.
I'd probably trade Skinner straight up for Vlasic if given the opportunity. We'd save 2M in space and Vlasic would be overpaid, but not to the same extent that Skinner is. And it'd fill an immediate need (2 LHD)
Yeah, but both of those players are already bordering on useless and signed into their late 30s. Skinner is in his 20s and a season removed from potting 40 goals. Skinner's contract is going to have some ugly years on it, but he's far, far, far more likely to bounce back to being worth most of his cap hit than a bunch of other players on bad contracts around the league.
I know its hf boards, but the amount of people who think Skinner's contract is worse than Vlasic's or Seabrook's is hilarious.
Was creating scoring chances on the bottom six and one of our best forecheckers just didn't finish. People are watching his stats and not his play.I watch Skinner and still think hes good. I just don't get it.
Was creating scoring chances on the bottom six and one of our best forecheckers just didn't finish. People are watching his stats and not his play.
Was creating scoring chances on the bottom six and one of our best forecheckers just didn't finish. People are watching his stats and not his play.
Skinner is exasperating to watch. He kills every line he's on by hanging onto the puck doing his little spin moves trying to work himself in closer while his teammates stand around and watch until he loses the puck. He takes his team out of the play. He's always going to be a liability until he learns to distribute the puck. He's said to be uncoachable, but for about $30 I think he can be broken of these bad habits.