Leafs won't do that.Once again, 1st + Dermott, end of story. You don't need to go back and forth for another 15 pages, that's the only type of deal we should be looking at for Petry.
Leafs won't do that.Once again, 1st + Dermott, end of story. You don't need to go back and forth for another 15 pages, that's the only type of deal we should be looking at for Petry.
1st+Sandin is in the ballpark, on the high side of it but not ridiculousPetry for a 2019 1st and one of Sandin or Liljegren. Only deal I see happening if I'm trading Petry to the Leafs.
Too much? Well what do you think a rental for an above average top 4D costs at the deadline? Petry has a great 3 year AAV contract left. Hit fits any team that is a Stanley Cup contender looking to improve their top 4D.
1st+Sandin is in the ballpark, on the high side of it but not ridiculous
I don't see him the same as you do - I would call him a below average top 4 D (I think he's a #3) with a market to slightly above market contract, but he's one of just a few guys who might be available today that is able to handle tough competition as a RHD and I do like that he has a little bit of term left so I'd probably make the deal if it was out there. I don't see Petry as "the answer" for us, but I think he'd be a good bandaid while we found or developed that guy. Ideally Liljegren is ready for Petry's minutes in 3 yearsI'd make that trade. It's a solid futures package that the Leafs likely prefer not to trade but Petry does seem to fit. His 3 years in term and low AAV for an above average top 4D is good value.
Habs and Leafs are never good trade partners. However, I think other teams would have a hard time beating the 2019 1st and Sandin package. Definitely sparks a conversation but the Habs need Weber back healthy before we make this trade.
I don't see him the same as you do - I would call him a below average top 4 D (I think he's a #3) with a market to slightly above market contract, but he's one of just a few guys who might be available today that is able to handle tough competition as a RHD and I do like that he has a little bit of term left so I'd probably make the deal if it was out there. I don't see Petry as "the answer" for us, but I think he'd be a good bandaid while we found or developed that guy. Ideally Liljegren is ready for Petry's minutes in 3 years
would you call Hamonic a top pairing defender? He got a similar package. Larsson got substantially more than that as the previous guy of the same tier that was traded100% disagree. Petry is not a below average top 4D. If he was, you should not be talking about a 1st and Sandin as a possible trade package. It don't add up buddy
Rielly ______
Gardiner Zaitsev
Dermott Hainsey
Borgman Carrick
Call ups: Rosen Holl Liljegren Ozhiganov Marincin
Leafs will add a top 4 at the deadline (for picks) if and only if one of the call ups don't prove they can be a top 4 in the first 60 games of the season.
1st+Sandin is in the ballpark, on the high side of it but not ridiculous
It's a bit on the high side, but I think Petry makes our D corps respectable for a few years so I wouldn't let retention stymie the deal personally. To each their own though, I get your perspective hereWe're talking retention at that price.
LD is a strength for the Leafs on the big club roster, so Sandin is probably a better starting point then. I'd much rather give up Sandin than KapanenI gotta say 1st+Sandin sounds more enticing than 1st+2nds/Kapanen/Brown. LD is a big position of concern for us.
I gotta say 1st+Sandin sounds more enticing than 1st+2nds/Kapanen/Brown. LD is a big position of concern for us.
Will do. The leafs get worse trading Dermott in exchange for Petry, never mind adding a 1st to thatPetry has term left in his contract. He is not a pending UFA. The minute a top 4D like Petry comes available, the Leafs are not the only team interested. Pay up or live with what you have.
Will do. The leafs get worse trading Dermott in exchange for Petry, never mind adding a 1st to that
Personally I would part with Sandin. Lili is too close to the NHL and is the hard to get rh young D that the leafs need. They are already deep at LHDExcept Dermott is not the piece I am personally asking for. It's the 2019 1st and one of Liligren or Sandin. I'm targeting futures and I realize that the Leafs prefer not to subtract from the current roster.
You can keep Dermott. Nothing against him but not my target. I am targeting futures
Are the Habs not rebuilding? Maybe I'm mistaken but I thought they'd wanna gain as many assets as possible. Keep a few vets around, sure, but Petry seems like a player teams would overpay for.
saw that you edited this in after I replied. Liljegren actually was compared to Dahlin a lot before their drafts, Dahlin thought of as better even then but Liljegren was thought of as a good enough prospect to get the comparison. Liljegren fell hard in his draft year because he wasn't good, but he had also gotten mono and the scouts didn't know what was him and what was the illness. The biggest thing that came from this year was that the lapses in judgement and terrible processing time that he was displaying in his draft year were gone, which has lead most people to believe that most of that was the mono and not him.Liljegren is age 19. Were not talking about Dahlin type prospect here. Most defenseman take a few years of grooming to make an impact in the NHL. He is a few years away yet but I admire your enthusiasm. Similar pick as Beaulieu and I remember I had the same hope with him. Beaulieu also had a better first year in the AHL as well on a team that was worse in talent too!
He had also gotten mono and the scouts didn't know what was him and what was the illness.
right, the post you quoted didn't question whether he had mono, it said the scouts "didn't know what was him and what was the illness", meaning the cause of the cognitive lapses he was having that caused him to go from a potential #1 pick to a mid teens pickThis isn't true. It was widely reported at the time that he was battling mono. The scouts, and fans, were aware of his illness. There was no mystery to it at all. The diagnosis came in September.
right, the post you quoted didn't question whether he had mono, it said the scouts "didn't know what was him and what was the illness", meaning the cause of the cognitive lapses he was having that caused him to go from a potential #1 pick to a mid teens pick