JPT
Registered User
- Jul 4, 2024
- 619
- 1,285
Follow me on Twitter. ■n■u■d■e■s■i■n■b■i■o■X/Twitter is basically all bots now. It has become useless.
Follow me on Twitter. ■n■u■d■e■s■i■n■b■i■o■X/Twitter is basically all bots now. It has become useless.
X/Twitter is basically all bots now. It has become useless.
Anyone who leaks confidential information at their job would be fired, that's common sense.If all he did was he leaked some picks and got fired for that, I think that's ridiculous.
The people who got their feelings hurt by that should stop being such babies. That's no reason to fire a popular personality who added a lot to the network.
That’s different,If that's true it's a classic flying to close to the sun tale.
Remember when Seravelli leaked all the expansion draft picks lol.
That is not the question we are asking. We are asking what happenedHe confirmed via his own Twitter account that he's not coming back.
How do you think confidential information gets out? And there’s nothing confidential about this information either. What was the loss by him leaking it out?Anyone who leaks confidential information at their job would be fired, that's common sense.
This wasn't a case where he's an insider hunting down leaked information in a reporter role. He was being told this information, obviously in confidence, as part of a job.
Set up the interview?
The player gets selected, goes to the stage, then goes to the table (that Marek was at)...
what "set-up" is needed?
It's always tough to separate the artist (Don Cherry) from the art (piano desk).Don Cherry has been spewing garbage since the 1980's, his senile self couldn't handle the multiculturalism of Canada growing so he had to spew shit like 'you people'.
I clearly understood what he was saying, guy was a racist bitch back in 1989 and he was still a racist bitch until his firing.
Wait 2 minutes, until team announces pick, his job was to interview the pick.How do you think confidential information gets out? And there’s nothing confidential about this information either. What was the loss by him leaking it out?
What political commentary? Never paid attention to him for the most partHopefully Elliotte will find a better co-host. I won't miss hipster goof Marek and the veiled political commentary he would slip in from time to time.
There's a difference between anonymously leaking stuff to a reporter when you're a relative nobody, and blatantly telling people info when you're the public face of a company's productHow do you think confidential information gets out? And there’s nothing confidential about this information either. What was the loss by him leaking it out?
He was part of the broadcast team that was showing the draft.How do you think confidential information gets out? And there’s nothing confidential about this information either. What was the loss by him leaking it out?
Leafs fans when the media doesn't revolve around them for 5min:His strength is his hockey knowledge and history of the game. His weakness in the media is his lack of fandom and passion to a team.
Only my opinion.
At times he seemed to be allergic about the Leafs. Would rather share his insights about Minnesota or Winnipeg etc etc
I started to tune him out a bit…
I'm not saying he should've done it. I'm saying that firing one of your most popular personalities because he did something he shouldn't have is a little ridiculous.There's a difference between anonymously leaking stuff to a reporter when you're a relative nobody, and blatantly telling people info when you're the public face of a company's product
I'm not saying he should've done it. I'm saying that firing one of your most popular personalities because he did something he shouldn't have is a little ridiculous.
There was no loss from what he did.
What's the point of having rules if you're just gunna let him break them because he's a popular personality?I'm not saying he should've done it. I'm saying that firing one of your most popular personalities because he did something he shouldn't have is a little ridiculous.
There was no loss from what he did.
That is not the question we are asking. We are asking what happened
But we have to define the degree of the wrong. People aren't supposed to be on social media while working. Do they do so and get caught? Yes, and the punishment usually isn't being fired. It's usually nowhere near that.What's the point of having rules if you're just gunna let him break them because he's a popular personality?
Probably only Friedman (top insider) and Bieksa (top player personality) are the ones above the law at sportsnet. The host/interviewer "bus driver" types are a dime a dozen. David Amber, Scott Oake, Shawn McKenzie, Kyle Bukaskas can all do Marek's job, and so can a whole bunch of others we've never heard of
You'll be okLeafs fans when the media doesn't revolve around them for 5min:
Yeah Marek is no loss at all.You rip what you seesaw. And off you go, with your fake laughs.
He pretty much single-handedly destroyed Hockey Central @ Noon, by unceremoniously kicking Darren Millard, Kypreos & MacLean off of it. That trio was always a lot better than what Marek did with the show afterwards. I had to stop following it.
Milquetoast is, indeed, the keyword, and there's only so much of it you can take.
(That Marek also threw Don Cherry under the bus goes without saying; that was required standard behavior of Sportsnet employees.)
If the pick is into the NHL at the time Marek is given the info, it doesn't change anything. It does give other clubs a couple of extra minutes to make their decision, but you figure in round 1 they have a sheet with the top whatever number of players they have and just take the next one on their list. Or they look at trading their pick if they see a faller or sense a riser.How do you think confidential information gets out? And there’s nothing confidential about this information either. What was the loss by him leaking it out?