Toggle sidebar

Player Discussion Jayden Struble Part 3 the Greek God Strouble Edition

Rapala said:
The main problem I have with Struble is he is not opportunistic. What I mean by that is he will often pass up the best play for a safer play which sucks the wind out of any O shift we are trying to build on. The worst part is he'll typically end up being the open man as teams tend to give him more space. It gets super annoying when he's out there with our top line which is far too often for my liking.
Click to expand...

I'll watch for that. For now I just want him to not turn the puck over, as he did a couple of times that shift. I think that's what he's focusing on now as he continues to get his feet wet in the NHL.

Habs are playing well.

Great play by Suzuki to dump it into himself like that.

Nice of Struble to get it to the net
 
Tyson said:
Struble has really upped his game recently. He has filled in for Guhle very nicely
Click to expand...
MSL didn't like him earlier this season but Struble has stuck with it and seems much improved.

For the season, his TOI/gp is down compared to last year, 14:43 this year to 16:07 last year. However, in his last 10gp he's at 14:52 TOI mins/game and in his last 5gp he's up to 17:04 mins/game. He's currently our 4th dman... a significant progress from 7th or 8th dman.

For comparison:
Jordan Harris has played 29 games this year and averages 11:07 TOI/game... he's been healthy scratched since Feb 8th

Justin Barron has played 40 games this year and averages 16:06 TOI/game... he's been leaned on quite a bit recently, he's also his team's 4th dman now

Jayden Struble has played 34 games this year and averages 14:43 TOI/game

1740917587242.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChikN and Tyson
Happy that Guhle's injury has allowed him to get a chance to play. He had a very strong training camp but then injuries and rotating with Barron derailed his season. Still unsure if he can be more than a #5. Don't know if there is room for both him and Xhekaj at the same time long term
 
  • Like
Reactions: habbubba
Victoire HuGo said:
Happy that Guhle's injury has allowed him to get a chance to play. He had a very strong training camp but then injuries and rotating with Barron derailed his season. Still unsure if he can be more than a #5. Don't know if there is room for both him and Xhekaj at the same time long term
Click to expand...
I would be OK if he was a solid #5.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Estimated_Prophet and CHwest
Struble is the kind of D that has a lot of tools (Smooth skater, good hitter and grit, strong passer, disciplined etc) and he generally knows his limits and has been good playing within them. But we have to remember that even though he's only average/decent right now, he's a smart player. He makes good decisions and because he's such a good athlete we have to be patient, because I think once he collects enough games played in the NHL, he's going to be such a steady presence as a depth D. He's going to use his physical tools in a effective way via decision making and experience.

I think about a D like Beaulieu and how he had no toolbox, and I look at Struble and I see so much potential because he strikes me as a real student of the game. A guy that doesn't have the most talent but he's got a rare combo of athletics and IQ. I think in his prime he could be a more physical and mobile Josh Gorges
 
  • Like
Reactions: MasterD, Vachon23, Miller Time and 3 others
Struble looking good with Hutson. This is very interesting going forward. GMs value guys who can play top 4 D or top 6 fwd even if they 'get carried'.

His value in the market is picking up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 26Mats and Miller Time
Skip Bayless said:
Struble looking good with Hutson. This is very interesting going forward. GMs value guys who can play top 4 D or top 6 fwd even if they 'get carried'.

His value in the market is picking up.
Click to expand...
rik schau said:
Not a popular thing to say around here but I like his overall game more than Arbers.
Click to expand...
As of right now, he plays a game that is much more helpful to the team than Xhekaj. He plays faster and more fluid with the puck. While Xhekaj brings the needed physical backbone.

Makes me wonder, if we have to choose between the two, will Struble give Xhekaj a run for his money? Can we keep all of Xhekaj, Struble, Matheson, Hutson, and Guhle long term? Would HuGo use a guy like Guhle or Reinbacher if he had the chance to do so to acquire a 2c at Suzuki's level?

I still only see Struble's trade value peaking at a 2nd round pick, until he has veteran experience at least.
 
WinterLion said:
Do we trade Matheson in the offseason and keep Struble?
Click to expand...
I'm thinking we might try to use one of our D's with trade value to get that really good 2c of the long term, and just a mediocre band aid.

Struble and Carrier have really stepped up. Plus, we could potentially sign Ekblad, Chychrun, Fabbro as a UFA if they make it to market and we want to replace a d sacrificed in a trade for a 2c.
 
Last edited:
WinterLion said:
Do we trade Matheson in the offseason and keep Struble?
Click to expand...
Even if we trade Matheson I don't see where Struble fits.

Left side has Guhle, Hutson and X. Right side has Carriere and (hopefully) RB. That leaves one more spot on the right and I think we'll go get somebody for that. I think both Matheson and Struble are trade bait.

I like Struble a lot. I'd love to keep him and wish he was on the right side. But X provides a dimension that's sorely needed and I'd keep him instead.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hannibal and 26Mats
26Mats said:
I'm thinking we might try to use one of our D's with trade value to get that really good 2c of the long term, and just a mediocre band aid.

Struble and Carrier have really stepped up. Plus, we could potentially sign Ekblad, Chychrun, Fabbro as a UFA if they make it to market and we want to replace a d sacrificed in a trade for a 2c.
Click to expand...
He was on waivers this season. We let him pass.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom