LeafsNation75
Registered User
This is a great picture of Spezza when he scored his 3rd goal to get the hat trick.
Don't forget he had that fight in Game 4 of their play-in series against Columbus.Spezza is a guy who will be valuable in playoffs too
Would it be out of the question to try Spezza in a 3rd line role? I’d really like to see what he could do with some more ice time and better line mates. He’s very noticeable whenever he’s on the ice. This could also possibly spread out the scoring.
Matthews Marner
Tavares Thornton
Spezza Nylander
I’d also like to see Brooks in the 4C slot. Enough trying to stick square pegs into round holes.
Kerfoot, Hyman and Soup to fill out the remaining top 9 wing spots.I didn’t mind Kerfoot on the wing last game. Thought he had one of his best games.
You can tell his pedigree is just levels above the journeymen he plays with and against in the bottom 6.
Might not have the athleticism he did 15 years ago but he's been a fantastic addition, never expected to like him as much as i do.
You can tell his pedigree is just levels above the journeymen he plays with and against in the bottom 6.
Might not have the athleticism he did 15 years ago but he's been a fantastic addition, never expected to like him as much as i do.
He has 40 points in his last 82 games playing like 10 mins a night. In Marleau’s good season with us he had 47 playing way more minutes.
Turns out you don’t need to pay 6M for leadership and vets.
Playing on the fourth line is more about load management than capability. They've found that sweet spot at 10-12 min.Would it be out of the question to try Spezza in a 3rd line role?
Lou bought into whatever Babcock was selling and all his moves reflected that.Lou Lam with all of his years of experience didn't understand that.
Really the only way we can go financially, but the good part is we're an attractive destination because of our talent.Spezza, Thornton, Simmonds signings are the way to go. Not Marleau for 6M+ for 3 years. Lou Lam with all of his years of experience didn't understand that.
Really the only way we can go financially, but the good part is we're an attractive destination because of our talent.
As for Marleau, paying him 6M for two years was low risk because our young stars were all on ELCs. Giving him that third year was just plain stupid.
Really the only way we can go financially, but the good part is we're an attractive destination because of our talent.
As for Marleau, paying him 6M for two years was low risk because our young stars were all on ELCs. Giving him that third year was just plain stupid.