opendoor
Registered User
- Dec 12, 2006
- 11,719
- 1,403
Don't forget 1984.
Yes, 3 of the last 5 years is completely irrelevant.
Don't forget 1984.
We'll see. I'd argue it's easier to make up a ton of ground in the dog days of an 82 game season than it is in the stretch drive of a truncated schedule.
I guess I just don't see them going 20-6-3 over games 20-48 this year, and that's what it took to get them from their poor start to top 5 in the conference at the 48 game mark last season.
ON the bright side... the oilers are 3rd in the conference and if the playoffs started today we would play the oil
Facetious? I'm asking seriously. LA is better than the Canucks, has everyone accepted this?
The regular season PTs and the SCF run seem to be clouding the fact that certain teams have well passed the Canucks in ability. LA is one, judging from the response here. I'd say NYR is another. CHI has always been there. BOS of course etc...
How good is this team really?
Without Ryan Kesler? Probably a 6-8 seed in the West. The Canucks sans Kesler are not an elite team. Just like they're a middle of the road club when the defense gets decimated with injuries.
People just can't comprehend the parity in the league right now.
Yes, 3 of the last 5 years is completely irrelevant.
Kassian was good but I didn't think he had an amazing game by any stretch.
He turned over the puck a ton tonight with all these blind passes to the middle of the ice which led to turnovers.
Still had a good game but It's not as amazing as I think people are making it out to be.
I'd like to see;
Sedins/Kassian
Higgins/Kesler/Burrows
Raymond/Schroeder/Booth
Malhotra/Lapierre/Hansen
and our D get comfortable before I concede that all these teams are better.
I think there have been more than enough games over the past few years that should tell us where the Canucks are, and by comparison where other teams are. Is LA better? Is BOS clearly better? Because then I think people wouldn't be as incredulous with what's going on right now. If it is accepted that these teams are just flat out better, people would expect to lose to the Kings/Rangers/Hawks/Bruins etc...
Basically, you wouldn't get the strong reactions you are getting here due to that acceptance.
Keith ballard is our best d-man by far this year, We are in trouble boys.
Without Ryan Kesler? Probably a 6-8 seed in the West. The Canucks sans Kesler are not an elite team. Just like they're a middle of the road club when the defense gets decimated with injuries.
People just can't comprehend the parity in the league right now.
Take it from me I lived it! Brodeur won the Calder the year before, and I actually thought he was the second coming of Sean Burke early in that lockout shortened 95 season.
I think you guys have a good chance this year. I'm rooting for you in the west!
It's actually very encouraging. I'm confident the top 4 will come around - but having Ballard and Tanev play this well all season would be huge. Will keep the defense fresh in a condensed schedule, help cover for injuries on the backend and actually make Ballard moveable this summer when he inevitably moves on.
The defense is taking a lot of heat but look no further than the play of the forwards as to why they're struggling so bad. Without Kesler we're leaning on guys that are getting outmatched, can't sustain offensive zone pressure and are chasing the play all too often on lost faceoffs.
The defense will look much better when Kesler returns. But if Kesler isn't healthy come playoff time, this team goes nowhere.
I'm pretty sure any fan would be upset with their team leading 2-0 and blowing that lead. That's happened three times now in five games. But the Kings were a lot better than the Canucks... not really sure what to make of this team right now (especially with injuries and only 5 games in).
He wasn't out there for the last half of the 3rd and OT (was specifically watching for him to see how AV would use him against LA too).
But why? If LA is known to be the better team, and they are clearly outplaying VAN in the current game, why would fans be as upset blowing that same lead?
It takes me back to the days when the Sakic+Forsberg combo would annihilate the Canucks and it wouldn't matter if the Canucks were up or down at points during the game. The better team just found a way to win. This would be like that. If people accepted LA is a better team, you wouldn't get this type of reaction.
How people think we sat back is beyond me.
LA was the better team tonight. Territorially dominated from puck drop. We did not sit back, we were out matched at every turn.
The two goals were nice hard work team goals, but the Canucks can't compete wit that size and strength, especially withou Kesler and Booth.
Oh well...
Without Ryan Kesler? Probably a 6-8 seed in the West. The Canucks sans Kesler are not an elite team. Just like they're a middle of the road club when the defense gets decimated with injuries.
People just can't comprehend the parity in the league right now.