More like, Daley had many good years as a Star. The D-corps thinned out and he was pushed up the depth chart. Even then he actually succeeded. It just kept progressing to the point where he was a de facto 1D in Dallas.
FTR I never argued your point about Pittsburgh here. I specifically mentioned the job the Pens did with Niskanen as a feather in the cap. I just thought you were going hard on the "we took this poor healthy scratch Daley and turned him into a good player". If he didn't work out at all in Chicago that is on them. He DID work out in Dallas and was 30 games removed from that when he arrived in Pittsburgh.
Just because we traded him didn't mean we didn't value him. The context of the trade was Daley had just one year left on his contract. The emergence of Klingberg meant he was going to be pushed back down the depth chart and not worth the extension he would be seeking. He was still a very good player when he left Dallas. If you slice off the less than half season in another uniform you would have zero claim adding Daley to the list of D-men Pittsburgh has rehabbed.
I was really happy for Daley when he won the Cup. His best years in Dallas were wasted in terms of team competitiveness. Great dude and by all accounts a great teammate.
But again...that's just like Kessel, and just like Schultz. They were never bad players, but they struggled when in over their heads. They were simply misused on their previous teams and so seen as disposable, but found confidence and became better players when they were used in roles that played to their strengths in Pittsburgh.
Case in point is your example of Dallas moving Daley because of Klingberg's emergence. With that new development, Daley no longer had to be misused as "the defacto #1 d" but could've been pushed back down the depth chart into a role better suited to him. Instead he was viewed as disposable.
As far as I can see, nothing here suggests that Daley doesn't belong in the category of quality assets the Pens bought at a low ebb, then nurtured into players of value. But YMMV, and probably does.
![Wink ;) ;)]()