Jamie Benn with his standard reckless, intent-to-injure hit

Drake1588

UNATCO
Sponsor
Jul 2, 2002
30,263
2,913
Northern Virginia
He received a penalty for the boarding, and then fought the biggest guy the opposition has for his insouciance. Carlo seems OK. Maybe give Benn a game, if you like, but I'd consider that bill paid in full.

If there was a bad injury, or no call, or no fight, then I might feel differently. Yet you can tick off all three on the list. To me, this is the officiating and the code both ensuring there is restitution in the moment. I think it's over.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BHD

Pablo El Perro

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Oct 10, 2007
25,817
13,771
guys who use that line are the same guys who play beer league against old timers and think they’re good because they get a goal.

Settle down.
I'm not using a line. Just saying those who use the stopped angle have never been a defenseman trying to play a puck. So, you. It also explains why you don't get distance from the boards makes the play even more dangerous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RoyIsALegend

Ad

Ad

Ad