KIRK
Registered User
- Aug 2, 2005
- 109,700
- 51,216
HAHHhahhahahhahhaHAHHAHhhhah. Oh wait... are you being serious?! :biglaugh
Mr Mod, should we lock this and start another thread?
HAHHhahhahahhahhaHAHHAHhhhah. Oh wait... are you being serious?! :biglaugh
Malone better than Neal huh (for Geno). Ok, we'll agree to disagree.
I'm utterly shocked at how you could really dis Neal regarding production or lack of contributions. Are you sure you watched these two play? And yes I'm being completely serious. Geno doesn't score 50 goals if Neal is merely a leech, that's nonsensical. My gosh what the hell is with you people!!!!Perhaps Geno scored 50 because Neal was on the other wing, like he scored 40 with Malone on the other wing for half a season.
And, if Neal was even a nominal factor in terms of Geno scoring goals, then why was Geno's goal production so much less without Neal? Why did Geno look so much better on Sid's wing than he had at any point centering Neal in the playoffs?
Here's a hint: LEECH
This past post season, yes, but what about the previous playoff runs they played together?So would the playoffs.
That's a terrible approach. You don't want to give up an asset and get back minimal or less than fair value for. As far as having someone pan out, well yeah that'd be great. but there aren't any guarantees. And in fact there's a lot more questions then answers. If you're a now team that doesn't seem to make a lot of sense. Time is of the essence, it's not as if we are in a complete rebuild.
He also had to take on the oppositions top pairing defensemen and top checking line in Sid's absence.It also stuck Kunitz on the LW, meaning Geno didn't have to do all of the line's dirty work by himself.
Suppose you enlighten me as to how that's a funny statement? What, I can't objectively look at such a trade and arrive at an impartial conclusion?HAHHhahhahahhahhaHAHHAHhhhah. Oh wait... are you being serious?!