RiverbottomChuck
Registered User
Hope he stays on a good deal but I’m sure he will have no shortage of offers. He can do a lot stapled next to a star player.
I want him back.
What you’re probably going to spend on him is what you’ll end up spending on a player of lesser skill in the open market IMO.
Guy has a broken hand thus explaining his droughts, Got healthy in time for playoffs and had a heck of a run.
He’s so good on both sides of the puck.
Jake DeBrusk should be the second highest priority to re sign after Swayman
I have been on Jake side for a long time, but even I have said this season maybe a change was needed for player and team. I ask you will you be saying he should have been a "priority" after Swayman, when he is going through one of his droughts, or invisible runs.Exactly my thought too.
I have been on Jake side for a long time, but even I have said this season maybe a change was needed for player and team. I ask you will you be saying he should have been a "priority" after Swayman, when he is going through one of his droughts, or invisible runs.
Hes always going to be a streaky player. Having said that this team needs scoring. Unless you can get same or better cheaper you have to look to re-sign.
Now if he out prices himself thats a horse of a different color.
Agree, they need scoring.
But Debrusk's numbers per 82 games is 24-22-46. In the playoffs 26-19-45.
I'd be looking for a real scorer instead.
You are right if he out prices himself, he can end our discussion without a doubt. He is a talent that is for sure, but I feel has more to offer, and I think these playoffs support my argument.Hes always going to be a streaky player. Having said that this team needs scoring. Unless you can get same or better cheaper you have to look to re-sign.
Now if he out prices himself thats a horse of a different color.
As long as he gets hot during the playoffs. Anyway, the hand injury explains part of his mid-season slump this past year.I have been on Jake side for a long time, but even I have said this season maybe a change was needed for player and team. I ask you will you be saying he should have been a "priority" after Swayman, when he is going through one of his droughts, or invisible runs.
This past playoffs was an apt microcosm of DeBrusk. He was hustling, scoring some, showing speed and drive. Then he has a play last night where he blocks a weak-ish wrister and sits on his ass in the slot Bob Sweeney style until the Panthers score.This team needs all the speed they can find and DeBrusk is one of the only guys they've got whopossesses it.Can letting go of one of the only fleet players they've got possibly be a good idea? Is there any possibility that additional Jake DeBrusk seasons pass without me following through on my threats of whiskey bottle annihilation directed at my television, as a stand in for DeBrusk?
One of the most bizarre Bruins I've seen.
I dont disagree. But they must at very least replace his production at a reasonable cost.
Unfortunately easier said than done. Gonna be interesting.
That just made my eyes roll up inside my skull. If I ever suffer and survive a stroke, I'm calling it my Jake DeBrusk episode.Led the team in scoring in the playoffs.
Had the worst plus/minus on the team in the playoffs.
Consider Debrusk had more points than both combined in the playoffs.Consider Geekie and Freddy both matched his production this season at reasonable cost.
Consider Debrusk had more points than both combined in the playoffs.
Consider Geekie and Freddy both matched his production this season at reasonable cost.