0-12 actually. They got swept in 2009 as well.And you're about to run your ECF losing streak to 0-8. You gonna hang a participation banner?
0-12 actually. They got swept in 2009 as well.And you're about to run your ECF losing streak to 0-8. You gonna hang a participation banner?
ThanksThe Oilers have three major holes. Top six winger is likely the least important, but it is still a hole.
Would you trade him as part of a package for Lindholm and Hanifan?
Dubas, I thought they fired you? Boston trades for Pastas' best friend and does not look back.Unlikely trading partners but I would do Nylander for Debrusk +. Or involve a third team and have them send a player to Boston.
Jake on Calgary and Louie on Edmonton's broadcast team could make for interesting Battle of Alberta calls, ha ha.I do think that DeBrusk's ability to play both wings and him being someone you assume wouldn't have an issue with staying long term in western Canada could make sense for another FLA/CGY style swap, but one I hope would be better for both sides.
Yes any day...Debrusk or Hall, Grezlyck?Would you trade him as part of a package for Lindholm and Hanifan?
DeBrusk and Hall have expiring contracts ,DeBrusk in 23 and Hall in 24 , they will be cheaper than what you will be able to sign Bertuzzi for and in my opinion better all around players . please do not misunderstand me ,I like Bertuzzi always have and hope that something although a long shot they are able to resign him . With the salary cap mess the bruins are in those two short term contracts might be best to right the ship cap wise short term..........Debrusk is a top 6 forward for sure but we can't keep everyone. I expect him to be a cap casualty for the Bruins. The only question is what can they get in return for him when teams know the Bruins have to move him despite not wanting to do so.
I disagree with you on this, they re deep in the net so Ullmark need to go high value Vezina nominee with 2 years contrat he have a NMC 16 teams no trade list but half of the league need a great goalie...i can easily see Kings, Canes, Jets as a potential trade partners...Ully s gonna be trade for a centeri think they'll move debrusk before ullmark.
I disagree with you on this, they re deep in the net so Ullmark need to go high value Vezina nominee with 2 years contrat he have a NMC 16 teams no trade list but half of the league need a great goalie...i can easily see Kings, Canes, Jets as a potential trade partners...Ully s gonna be trade for a center
Eh, might be a return for PLD. PLD going to Boston, loving it, and signing long term would be f***ing hilarious. They'd only want Ullmark if Hellebuyck is gone, which might not happen until after PLD is moved. No one knows wtf is going on in Winnipeg outside them not wanting to "rebuild" but more of a "retool"
It makes it very hard to come up with fake trade proposals to WPG.
It will depend on:
- Does Helle and/or Mark resign and is PLD traded?
- If two (or all three) of those three aren't back next year, Jets pretty have to rebuild bc they have no 1G or any top 6 centers and aren't getting back via FA or trade. Jets will do everything reasonable possible to make sure at least two of those guys are likely back next year to avoid any rebuild. For all the jokes about Jets having to overpay players actually isn't true, Chevy actually does very good signing guys at or below market value. This though might be an exception, Helle could become the highest paid goalie in the NHL in this situation. Mark also might get overpaid to extend and avoid any rebuild. If the Jets go rebuild, Jake would be of no interest, Jets would only want picks and prospects which would be hard for Boston to do.
- If the Jets were able to sign two of those three and trade PLD........they would want roster players back and not futures. In this case Boston and Jets could make a hockey trade. Boston has at least a couple interesting guys who might be available in a trade for PLD (whatever that would look like). By far this is the preferred course for the Jets, retooling.
Time will tell
I would just add one other option. If just Mark re-signs the Bruins can take care of the goalie situation for WPG although I assume in a PLD deal it’s Swayman+ not Ullmark+ for the more years of control.
Seems like a huge overpay for the BruinsI would just add one other option. If just Mark re-signs the Bruins can take care of the goalie situation for WPG although I assume in a PLD deal it’s Swayman+ not Ullmark+ for the more years of control.
Edit: to bring it back full circle, at least one Bruins fan on our board wondered if Swayman + DeBrusk for PLD would make both teams happy if both teams had some positive chit chat with the other sides agents.